European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 95, Issue 1 , Pages 119-126, March 2001

Nitrofurantoin and congenital abnormalities

  • Andrew E Czeizel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Genetics and Teratology, Foundation for the Community Control of Hereditary Diseases, National Centre for Epidemiology, Torokvesz Lejto 32, 1026 Budapest, Hungary
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +36-1-394-4712; fax: +36-1-394-4712
  • ,
  • Magda Rockenbauer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Genetics and Teratology, Foundation for the Community Control of Hereditary Diseases, National Centre for Epidemiology, Torokvesz Lejto 32, 1026 Budapest, Hungary
  • ,
  • Henrik T Sørensen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
  • ,
  • Jørn Olsen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine V, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Received 15 February 2000; accepted 18 April 2000.

Abstract 

Objective: To study human teratogenic potential of oral nitrofurantoin treatment during pregnancy. Materials and Methods: Pair analysis of cases with congenital abnormalities and matched population controls in the population-based dataset of the Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980–1996. Results: Of 38,151 pregnant women who had newborn infants without any congenital abnormalities (population control group), 774 (3.4%); of 22,865 case pregnant women who had newborns or fetuses with congenital abnormalities, 1079 (2.8%) and of 812 pregnant women who had newborns or fetuses with Down’s syndrome (patient controls), 23 (2.8%) pregnant women were treated with nitrofurantoin. The above differences between population controls and cases may be connected with recall bias, because the case-control pair analysis did not indicate a teratogenic potential of nitrofurantoin use during the second and the third months of gestation, i.e. in the critical period for major congenital abnormalities. Conclusion: Treatment with nitrofurantoin during pregnancy does not present detectable teratogenic risk to the fetus.

Keywords:  Nitrofurantoin, Human teratogenic potential, Congenital abnormalities, Case-control analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(00)00364-X

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 95, Issue 1 , Pages 119-126, March 2001