« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 96, Issue 2
, Pages 158-162
, June 2001
Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rate
References
-
National Center for Health Statistics. Births: final data for 1997. Annual analysis for final birth data, vol. 47, no. 18.96.
-
NHS Maternity Statistics, England 1989–90 to 1994–95. Department of Health Statistical Bulletin, December 1997.
-
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal delivery after a previous caesarean birth. ACOG practice patterns. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;48:127–9.
-
SIG Health Care Information, Obstetrics in the Netherlands, Trends 1989–1993. SIG Zorg-informatie, 1996. ISBN: 90 70755 47 5.
- . The Dutch obstetric intervention study — variation in practice patterns. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1995;50:145–150
-
.
Provider-associated factors in obstetric interventions.
Eur. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol. 1995;61:129–134
-
.
Analysis of repeat caesarean delivery indications: implications of heterogenicity.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1996;175:883–888
-
.
Vaginal birth after caesarean: a 10-year experience.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1994;84:255–258
-
.
Vaginal birth after caesarean.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1987;157:1510–1515
-
Yetman TJ, Nolan TE. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a reappraisal of risk. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;1119–23.
-
.
Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second caesarean section.
N Eng. J. Med. 1996;335:689–695
-
.
More than one previous caesarean delivery: a 5-years experience with 435 patients.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1995;85:924–929
-
.
Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1990;76:750–754
-
.
Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1994;83:927–932
-
.
Trial of labor in previous caesarean section patients, excluding classical caesarean sections.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1987;70:713–717
-
.
Catastrophic complications of previous caesarean section.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1990;163:738–742
-
.
Twice a caesarean always a caesarean.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1989;73:161–165
-
.
Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: are there useful and valid predictors of success or failure.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1992;166:1811–1819
- . Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. JAMA. 1994;272:524–529
-
.
The experience with vaginal birth after caesarean delivery in a small rural community practice.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1993;168:60–62
- . Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery, trial of labor in women with breech presentation. J. Reprod. Med. 1989;34:831–833
- . Trial of labor or repeated caesarean section. The woman’s choice. Arch. Fam. Med. 1997;6:120–125
-
.
Vaginal delivery after caesarean section.
Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1992;32(3):213–216
- . Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section for failure of second stage of labour. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1998;105:1079–1081
-
.
Vaginal birth after caesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1989;74:695–697
-
.
Outcome of trial of labor in patients with a single previous low transverse caesarean section for dystocia.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1988;71:380–384
-
.
Trial of labor following caesarean delivery.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1994;83:933–936
- . Vaginal birth after caesarean section at the university of Texas. J. Reprod. Med. 1992;37:880–882
-
.
First delivery after caesarean delivery for strictly defined cephalopelvic disproportion.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1998;92:799–803
-
.
Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at caesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after caesarean delivery.
Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997;89:591–593
-
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean birth. ACOG practice patterns. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;52:90–8.
PII: S0301-2115(00)00416-4
© 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 96, Issue 2
, Pages 158-162
, June 2001
