European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 125, Issue 2 , Pages 206-210 , 1 April 2006

When to induce labor for post-term? A study of induction at 41 weeks versus 42 weeks

Received 26 February 2005 ,Revised 6 July 2005 ,Accepted 11 July 2005.

Reference 

  1. Campbell MK, Ostbye T, Irgens LM. Post-term birth: risk factors and outcomes in a 10-year cohort of Norwegian births. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:543–548
  2. Ingemarsson I, Kallen K. Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76,761 post-term pregnancies in Sweden, 1982–1991: a register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:658–662
  3. Hilder L, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:169–173
  4. Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J. Perinatal and maternal complications related to post-term delivery: a national register-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:222–227
  5. Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000170 [review]
  6. Maternal–Fetal Medicine Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Post-term pregnancy (committee opinion). SOGC clinical practice guidelines. No. 15; 1997.
  7. Menticoglou SM, Hall PF. Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks gestation: nonsensus consensus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109:485–491
  8. Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:164–167
  9. Induction of labour. RCOG evidence based clinical guideline. No. 9; June 2001.

PII: S0301-2115(05)00386-6

doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.005

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 125, Issue 2 , Pages 206-210 , 1 April 2006