European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 137, Issue 1 , Pages 50-55, March 2008

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and preeclampsia among Peruvian women

  • Sixto E. Sanchez

      Affiliations

    • Health Direction V Lima City, Jr. Antonio Raymondi 220, La Victoria, Lima, Peru
  • ,
  • Chunfang Qiu

      Affiliations

    • Center for Perinatal Studies, Swedish Medical Center, 1124 Columbia Street, Suite 750, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 206 215 3053; fax: +1 206 386 3173.
  • ,
  • Maria T. Perales

      Affiliations

    • Health Direction V Lima City, Jr. Antonio Raymondi 220, La Victoria, Lima, Peru
  • ,
  • Nelly Lam

      Affiliations

    • Materno Perinatal Institute, Jr. Antonio Miroquezada 941, Barrios Altos, Lima, Peru
  • ,
  • Pedro Garcia

      Affiliations

    • Materno Perinatal Institute, Jr. Antonio Miroquezada 941, Barrios Altos, Lima, Peru
  • ,
  • Michelle A. Williams

      Affiliations

    • Center for Perinatal Studies, Swedish Medical Center, 1124 Columbia Street, Suite 750, Seattle, WA 98104, USA

Received 2 November 2006; received in revised form 22 May 2007; accepted 24 May 2007. published online 18 June 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

Mounting evidence supports the view that intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important cause of maternal mortality. Some, but not all, prior studies suggest that IPV is associated with increased risks of maternal medical conditions such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy which are leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide. We assessed the relation between IPV and risk of preeclampsia among Peruvian women.

Study design

We conducted a case-control study at two large hospitals in Lima, Peru. Preeclampsia cases were 339 women with pregnancy-induced hypertension and proteinuria (i.e., preeclampsia). Controls were 337 normotensive women. Information concerning women's exposure to physical and emotional violence during pregnancy was collected during in-person interviews conducted after delivery and while patients were in hospital. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from logistic regression models.

Results

The prevalence of IPV was 43.1% among cases and 24.3% among controls. Compared with those reporting never exposure to IPV during pregnancy, women reporting any exposure had a 2.4-fold increased risk of preeclampsia (OR=2.4; 95% CI: 1.7–3.3). The association was strengthened slightly after adjusting for maternal age, parity and pre-pregnancy adiposity (OR=2.7; 95% CI: 1.9–3.9). Emotional abuse in the absence of physical violence was associated with a 3.2-fold (95% CI: 2.1–4.9) increased risk of preeclampsia. Emotional and physical abuse during pregnancy was associated with a 1.9-fold increased risk of preeclampsia (95% CI: 1.1–3.5).

Conclusions

IPV among pregnant women is common and is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. These data support recent calls for coordinated global health efforts to prevent violence against women.

Keywords: Preeclampsia, Intimate partner violence, Pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(07)00235-7

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.05.013

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 137, Issue 1 , Pages 50-55, March 2008