European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 139, Issue 1 , Pages 43-45, July 2008

Self-collected versus health professional-collected genital swabs to identify the prevalence of group B streptococcus: A comparison of patient preference and efficacy

  • Anna Arya

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +353 214920500; fax: +353 214205025.
  • ,
  • Bartley Cryan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Microbiology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
  • ,
  • Kathleen O'Sullivan

      Affiliations

    • Statistical Laboratory, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
  • ,
  • Richard A. Greene

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland
  • ,
  • John R. Higgins

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland

Received 18 February 2007; received in revised form 23 October 2007; accepted 17 December 2007. published online 13 February 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

This study aims to determine the prevalence of genital tract group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization in a cohort of pregnant Irish women and to compare patient preference and efficacy of self-collected versus health professional-collected swabs.

Study design

In this prospective cohort study, 600 pregnant women attending public and private antenatal clinics at the Unified Maternity Services, Cork were included. At 35–37 weeks of pregnancy, these women self-collected an ano-vaginal swab and a health professional-collected a second swab on same clinic visit. The women filled a questionnaire to indicate their preferences. Statistical analysis was performed on SPSS Version 13.

Result

The cumulative prevalence of maternal GBS colonization was 11.7% (95% CI, 9.3–14.6). The sensitivity of the self-collected swab was 84.3% (95% CI, 73.2–91.5) and that of health professional-collected swab was 94.3% (95% CI, 85.3–98.2). While good agreement in efficacy was found between health professional and patient-collected swabs (Kappa=0.87, p<0.001, 97.5% measure of concordance), only 28.5% women preferred self-collection, while 43.2% preferred a health professional to collect the swab and 28.3% had no preference.

Conclusion

In our study the concordance between health professional and self-collected swab was excellent. However, pregnant women mainly prefer a health professional to collect their ano-vaginal swabs.

Keywords: Group B streptococcus, Prevalence, Patient preference of swab collection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(07)00518-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.12.005

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 139, Issue 1 , Pages 43-45, July 2008