European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 139-145, August 2008

A prospective randomized trial of acute tocolysis in term labour with atosiban or ritodrine

  • Roel de Heus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Perinatology & Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Perinatology & Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, KJ.02.507.0/P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 62 4732630; fax: +31 30 2505320.
  • ,
  • Eduard J.H. Mulder

      Affiliations

    • Department of Perinatology & Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jan B. Derks

      Affiliations

    • Department of Perinatology & Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Piet H.J. Kurver

      Affiliations

    • Holding P.H.J. Kurver B.V., De Meern, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Leo van Wolfswinkel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Gerard H.A. Visser

      Affiliations

    • Department of Perinatology & Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands

Received 10 July 2007; received in revised form 4 December 2007; accepted 3 January 2008. published online 04 March 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

To study the effects of the tocolytics atosiban and ritodrine in term labour.

Study design

Women in term labour, requiring acute tocolysis, were prospectively randomized for treatment with either atosiban i.v. (n=70) or ritodrine i.v. (n=70). There were three indications for acute tocolysis: (1) fetal distress followed by continuation of labour, (2) fetal distress followed by emergency caesarean section (CS), and (3) arrest of contractions in women waiting for a secondary CS in the absence of fetal distress. Primary endpoints were maternal blood pressure (MBP) and maternal heart rate (MHR). Secondary endpoints were intra-uterine pressure, fetal heart rate (FHR), 5′-Apgar score and umbilical arterial pH.

Results

Baseline characteristics did not differ between the study groups. The ritodrine group showed a significant rise in MHR (p<0.001), MHR remained unaltered in the atosiban group (p=0.31). No significant changes occurred in systolic and diastolic BP in either group. FHR rose by a maximum of 11.6bpm (8.5%) in the ritodrine group (p<0.001) compared to a rise of 4.9bpm (4.8%) in the atosiban group (p=0.27). No differences were found in blood loss and fetal outcome. Compared to baseline, uterine pressure was reduced by a maximum of 55% (p<0.001) after ritodrine administration, compared to a maximal reduction of 54% (p<0.001) after atosiban administration. These effects did not differ between the two treatment groups.

Conclusion

Considering the maternal effects, our results suggest a possible role for atosiban bolus in acute tocolysis in term labour.

Keywords: Tocolysis, Atosiban, Ritodrine, Intra-uterine resuscitation, Term labour

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(08)00008-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.001

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 139-145, August 2008