European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 176-186 , August 2008

Ethically acceptable prioritisation of childless couples and treatment rationing: “Accountability for reasonableness”

  • Håkan Lindström

      Affiliations

    • Gyn-Obst. Unit, Skellefteå Hospital, Sweden
    • ,
  • Susanne Waldau

      Affiliations

    • Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    • Strategic Health Care Management Office, Västerbotten County Council, Umeå, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Susanne Waldau, Strategic Health Care Management Office, Västerbottens läns landsting, S-901 89 Umeå, Sweden. Tel.: +46 907857214; fax: +46 907857351.

Received 10 February 2006 ,Revised 4 February 2008 ,Accepted 23 February 2008.

References 

  1. Swedish Government proposition 1996/97:60. Priorities in health care [in Swedish].
  2. The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. Priorities in health care. Ethics, economy, implementation. Final report by The Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission. Swedish Government Official Reports SOU 1995:5. Fritzes, Stockholm; 1995.
  3. For explicit and updated reasoning, please see The National Board of Health and Welfare. Nationella riktlinjer för bröst-, kolorektal- och prostatacancer sjukvård 2006. Beslutsstöd för prioriteringar. Preliminär version. [National guidelines for treatment of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer 2006. Support for decision making on prioritisation. Preliminary version]; 2006. p. 37 [in Swedish].
  4. National Board of Health and Welfare. National registry of quality in IVF treatment; 2007.
  5. Västerbotten County Council. Dimensionering, finansiering och subvention av behandling för barnlöshet i Västerbottens läns landsting. [Dimensioning, financing and subsidies for infertility treatment in Västerbotten County Council]. PM 2003-04-21; 2003 [in Swedish].
  6. Hull MG, Fleming CF, Hughes AO, McDermott A. The age-related decline in female fecundity: a quantitative controlled study of implanting capacity and survival of individual embryos after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(4):783–790
  7. Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 1999;17(5):1399–1403
  8. Landstingsförbundet [Union of County Councils]. Förbättringskunskap – förenklingskunskap. Hur vi arbetar med ständiga förbättringar vid Kvinnokliniken i Skellefteå. Skellefteå sjukvård. [Constant quality improvement work in the Gyn-Obstetrics Unit in Skellefteå]; 2004 [in Swedish].
  9. Plsek PE. Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine. Pediatrics. 1999;103:203–214
  10. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. Establishing a fair process for priority setting is easier than agreeing on principles. BMJ. 2000;321:1300–1301
  11. Argyris C, Putnam R, McLain Smith D. Action science. Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1985;
  12. Donabedian A. The quality of medical care. Science. 1978;200:856–864
  13. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. JAMA. 1988;260:1743–1748
  14. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: the challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323:625–628
  15. Västra Götaland County Council. Ofrivillig Barnlöshet—Riktlinjer för Utredning och Behandling i Västra Götaland. [Infertility—guidelines for investigation and treatment in Västra Götaland]; 2003 [in Swedish].
  16. Peterson S, Backlund I, Diderichsen F. Sjukdomsbördan i Sverige—en svensk DALY-kalkyl. Appendix 1. [The burden of disease in Sweden—a Swedish DALY-calculation. Appendix 1]. Folkhälsoinstitutet. 1998;1998:50;[in Swedish]
  17. Eden B. Övervikt och fetma minskar kvinnors fertilitet. [Overweight and obesity reduce female fertility]. Läkartidningen. 2003;49(100):4096–4099[in Swedish]
  18. Tanbo T, Dale PO, Abyholm T, Stokke KT. Follicle-stimulating hormone as a prognostic indicator in clomiphene citrate human menopausal gonadotropin-stimulated cycles for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:647–650
  19. Check JH, Nazari P, Check ML, Choe JK, Liss JR. Prognosis following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in patients with elevated day 2 or 3 serum follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) is better in younger vs. older patients. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2002;29:42–52
  20. An earlier version of this article, including the same statements, has been read and accepted by the representative in question.
  21. Daniels N, Sabin J. The ethics of accountability in managed care reform. Health Aff. 1998;17(5):50–64
  22. Daniels N, Sabin JE. Last chance therapies and managed care. Pluralism, fair procedures, and legitimacy. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998;28(2):27–41
  23. Martin DK, Giacomini M, Singer PA. Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy. 2002;61:279–290
  24. Carlsson P (director of The National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care). The 3rd national conference on prioritisation, Gothenburg; September 2005 [oral presentation].
  25. PrioriteringsCentrum [The National Knowledge Centre for Prioritisation in Health Care]. Vårdens alltför svåra val? Kartläggning av prioriteringsarbete och analys av riksdagens principer och riktlinjer för prioriteringar I hälso- och sjukvården. [The too hard choices in health care? Investigation of priority setting and analysis of the parliament's principles and guidelines for priority setting in health care]. PrioriteringsCentrum Report; March 2007. ISSN 1650-8475.
  26. National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW). Prioriteringar I hälso- och sjukvården. Socialstyrelsens analys och slutsatser utifrån rapporten “Vårdens alltför svåra val”. [Priority setting in health care. The NBHW analysis and conclusions based on the report “The too hard choices in health care”]; May 2007. ISBN 978-91-85483-31-0. Published at http://www.socialstyrelsen.se.
  27. County Council of Östergötland. Medical programs. Horizontal political prioritisation. From words to action. Sub-report; January 2004.
  28. Bäckman K, Andersson A, Carlsson P. Öppna prioriteringar i Östergötland Del I. Den politiska beslutsprocessen. [Open priority setting in Östergötland. Part I. The political decision making process]. PrioriteringsCentrum Report 2004:4; 2004 [in Swedish].
  29. Bäckman K, Karlsson E, Carlsson P. Öppna prioriteringar i Östergötland. Del III. Uppföljning av de politiska besluten – hur gick det sedan? [Open priority setting in Östergötland. Part III. Follow up on political decisions—what happened next?]. PrioriteringsCentrum Report 2006:3; 2006 [in Swedish].
  30. Swedish Government. Innovativa processer. [Innovative processes]. Swedish Government Official Reports 2003:90; 2003 [in Swedish].
  31. Calltorp J, Johansson A, Maathz G. Kunskapsbaserad ledning, styrning och utveckling inom hälso- och sjukvården. Slutrapport. [Knowledge based management and development in health care. Final report]. Sveriges kommuner och landsting. [The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR)]; 2006 [in Swedish].
  32. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, MacFarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629
  33. Waldau S. Local prioritisation work in health care – assessment of an implementation process. Health Policy. 2007;81(May (2/3)):133–145

PII: S0301-2115(08)00099-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.02.018

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 176-186 , August 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution