European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 141, Issue 2 , Pages 158-162, December 2008

Intravaginally applied metronidazole is as effective as orally applied in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis, but exhibits significantly less side effects

  • M. Brandt

      Affiliations

    • Representing the participating gynecologists of the Professional Association of Gynecologists Thuringia, D-99096 Erfurt, Germany
  • ,
  • C. Abels

      Affiliations

    • Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, D-33611 Bielefeld, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Medical Affairs, Sudbrackstrasse 56, D-33611 Bielefeld, Germany. Tel.: +49 521 8808 451; fax: +49 521 8808 474.
  • ,
  • T. May

      Affiliations

    • GBP, D-33617 Bielefeld, Germany
  • ,
  • K. Lohmann

      Affiliations

    • Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, D-33611 Bielefeld, Germany
  • ,
  • I. Schmidts-Winkler

      Affiliations

    • Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, D-33611 Bielefeld, Germany
  • ,
  • U.B. Hoyme

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, HELIOS-Klinikum Erfurt, D-99089 Erfurt, Germany

Received 18 March 2008; received in revised form 9 June 2008; accepted 11 July 2008. published online 15 August 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

Metronidazole is the drug of choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). However, so far the oral administration has not been clinically compared to the intravaginal application regarding efficacy, side effects and patient satisfaction in a scientific sound fashion.

Study design

Therefore, this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of short-term intravaginal (i.vag.) application of metronidazole (2× 1000mg pessaries 24h apart) vs. a single oral dose (p.o.) of metronidazole (1×2000mg tablets) in 263 patients with BV (double-dummy design). The follow-up period was 12 weeks. In addition, the number and the type of adverse events induced by the two regimens were compared, assuming better tolerability of the intravaginal application.

Results

Following the diagnosis of BV a total of 129 women (mean age 36.2 years) was orally treated with a single dose of 2g metronidazole whereas a total of 134 patients (mean age 35.5 years) was treated intravaginally with 1g metronidazole each day on two consecutive days and included in the per-protocol analysis. Non-inferiority of i.vag. application compared to p.o. administration was statistically significant regarding efficacy: Following intravaginal application the cure rate, assessed on day 8 after starting of the treatment, was 92.5% as compared to 89.9% after oral administration. Nausea was the most common adverse event reported in 10.2% i.vag. vs. 30.4% p.o. of all cases (p<0.001), abdominal pain in 16.8% i.vag. vs. 31.9% p.o. (p<0.01), a “metallic taste” in 8.8% i.vag. vs. 17.9% p.o. (p<0.05). Women treated i.vag. were highly satisfied with the treatment and more content as compared to the women treated p.o. with metronidazole (p<0.05, intent-to-treat analysis).

Conclusion

In this clinical trial the intravaginal application was as effective as the oral administration of metronidazole in treating BV. However, significantly less adverse events were reported after short-term intravaginal as compared to oral application (p=0.023) and probably led to a better patient compliance.

Keywords: Antibiotic, Adverse events, Oral, Vaginal, Therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(08)00291-1

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.022

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 141, Issue 2 , Pages 158-162, December 2008