European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 143, Issue 2 , Pages 93-97, April 2009

Feasibility and morbidity of using saline filled tissue expanders to reduce radiation-induced bowel injury in patients with gynecologic malignancies

  • Melissa A. Geller

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 420 Delaware St. S.E., MMC 395, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Tel.: +1 612 626 3111; fax: +1 612 626 0665.
  • ,
  • Peter A. Argenta

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
  • ,
  • Sajeena G. Thomas

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
  • ,
  • Kathryn E. Dusenbery

      Affiliations

    • Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
  • ,
  • Patricia L. Judson

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
  • ,
  • Matthew P. Boente

      Affiliations

    • Minnesota Oncology Hematology, P.A., Edina, MN 55435, United States

Received 17 August 2007; received in revised form 4 December 2008; accepted 28 December 2008. published online 23 January 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility and morbidity of using saline filled tissue expanders (TE) to displace the small bowel during radiation therapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Study design

Ten patients undergoing surgical exploration for a gynecologic malignancy and deemed to be at high risk for the late effects of radiation therapy were consented for the possible placement of a TE. Indication for placement was need for post-operative radiation. Small bowel exclusion was reported in terms of the lowest loop identified on treatment planning film using orally ingested barium.

Results

Small bowel loops were excluded from the pelvis to varying degrees in all patients. Lowest identifiable bowel was marked at the L4-L5 interspace in one patient, L5-S1 interspace in three patients, at or near the sacral promontory in three patients, and to the middle of S2 in one patient. In two patients the TE was removed prior to simulation. Early complications included migration of the TE during treatment, development of a vesicovaginal fistula requiring immediate removal of the TE, and enterocutaneous fistula formation in a patient who developed an abscess following treatment completion. Another patient experienced a rectovaginal fistula 18 months after removal of the TE.

Conclusions

TE placement can successfully isolate small bowel from the pelvis. Usage should be individualized to minimize the likelihood of short and long-term complications, particularly in patients at higher risk of morbidity.

Keywords: Tissue expander, Radiation, Small bowel prosthesis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(09)00004-9

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.12.013

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 143, Issue 2 , Pages 93-97, April 2009