European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 144, Issue 2 , Pages 110-114, June 2009

Routine second trimester ultrasound screening for prenatal detection of fetal malformations in Sassari University Hospital, Italy: 23 years of experience in 42,256 pregnancies

  • Giovanni Maria Fadda

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology, Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 12, Sassari 07100, Italy
  • ,
  • Giampiero Capobianco

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology, Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 12, Sassari 07100, Italy
  • ,
  • Antonio Balata

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
  • ,
  • Pietro Litta

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • ,
  • Guido Ambrosini

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • ,
  • Donato D’Antona

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • ,
  • Erich Cosmi

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • ,
  • Salvatore Dessole

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology, Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 12, Sassari 07100, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 0339 2897821 (mobile); fax: +39 079 228265.

Received 2 May 2007; received in revised form 9 January 2009; accepted 14 February 2009. published online 18 March 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To establish, for a determined period of time, the effectiveness of a program of ultrasound screening in detecting fetal malformations in prenatal time. To assess the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive and the negative predictive value of the ultrasound screening. To examine the trend of such indexes of diagnostic accuracy in a long time period.

Study design

The patients admitted to the study had effected at least one ultrasound examination within the second trimester of pregnancy (≤23 gestational weeks). The examined pregnant women were 42,256 and the period of reference ranged from January 1981 to December 2004. All patients delivered in Gynecologic and Obstetric Clinic of Sassari University, Sassari, Italy.

Results

In the considered period were reported 1050/42,256 (2.48%) cases of fetal malformations, of which 974 single and 76 multiple malformations. The cases of malformations diagnosed in prenatal period were 578/1050 (55.05%), of which 65/578 (11.24%) multiple anomalies. The overall sensitivity was 55.05% (95% confidence interval: 52–58%), with a variability from the 32.95% (cardiovascular system) to 81.05% (central nervous system) in relationship to the typology of the examined apparatus. The overall specificity was 99.88% (95% confidence interval: 98–99.9%), the predictive positive value 91.89% (95% confidence interval: 89–93%) and the negative predictive value 98.87% (95% confidence interval: 95–99%).

Conclusion

The sensitivity of the ultrasound screening undoubtedly appeared to be satisfactory. We believe that, for the examination of some apparatuses, as for the cardiovascular apparatus, with the extension of the standard examination (four-chamber view) to further plans of scanning, sensitivity could subsequently be improved.

Keywords: Fetal malformations, Ultrasound screening, Detection rate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(09)00120-1

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.045

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 144, Issue 2 , Pages 110-114, June 2009