European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 144, Issue 2 , Pages 119-123, June 2009

Low pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of medically indicated versus spontaneous preterm singleton birth

  • H.M. Salihu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, United States
    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Florida, United States
    • The Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and Babies, University of South Florida, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Center for Research and Evaluation, Lawton and Rhea Chiles Center For Healthy Mothers and Babies, University of South Florida, 3111 E. Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, FL 33613, United States. Tel.: +1 813 974 1073; fax: +1 813 974 8889.
  • ,
  • A.K. Mbah

      Affiliations

    • The Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and Babies, University of South Florida, United States
  • ,
  • A.P. Alio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community and Family Health, University of South Florida, United States
  • ,
  • H.B. Clayton

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community and Family Health, University of South Florida, United States
  • ,
  • O. Lynch

      Affiliations

    • The Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and Babies, University of South Florida, United States

Received 19 July 2008; received in revised form 1 October 2008; accepted 22 February 2009. published online 20 March 2009.

Abstract 

Objective(s)

There were three primary objectives of this study: (1) to estimate the risk of preterm and very preterm birth by severity of low pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), (2) to determine if the risk in preterm and very preterm birth by severity of low pre-pregnancy BMI differs for spontaneous versus medically indicated preterm delivery, and finally (3) to determine if there is a difference in the risk for preterm and very preterm birth by severity of low pre-pregnancy BMI across gradations of gestational weight gain.

Study design

This study utilized the Missouri maternally linked cohort files from 1989 to 1997. After restricting analyses to singleton live births (gestational age 20–44 weeks) and women with either a low or normal BMI, the final study population consisted of 437,403 births. Pre-pregnancy BMI was categorized as normal (19.5–24.9), mild thinness (17.0–18.5), moderate thinness (16.0–16.9) and severe thinness (≤15.9). Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and logistic regression with generalized estimating equations (GEE).

Results

Underweight mothers were more likely to experience a preterm delivery. For all preterm births, the risk among underweight mothers increased with ascending underweight severity (p<0.01). Higher risk estimates were observed for spontaneous than for medically indicated preterm birth. For each BMI category, extreme risk values for spontaneous preterm births were observed among women with very low gestational weight gain (<0.12kg/week). Severely thin mothers with very low and very high pregnancy weight gain were at the greatest risk for spontaneous preterm birth. By contrast, underweight women with moderate gestational weight gain (0.23–0.68kg/week) had the lowest risk for spontaneous preterm birth with the sole exception of moderately underweight gravidas.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that women with low or normal pre-pregnancy BMI should be counseled to maintain a moderate level of gestational weight gain (0.23–0.68kg/week) in order to reduce their risk for preterm birth. Further, our observation that severity of low pre-pregnancy BMI was associated directly (in a dose–response pattern) with preterm birth highlights the importance of preconceptional counseling for women—specifically the importance of women achieving or maintaining a normal weight status prior to pregnancy.

Keywords: Pregnancy, BMI, Preterm birth, Gestational weight gain, Nutrition

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by an obesity grant from the Council on African American Affairs (CAAA) to Dr. Hamisu Salihu (First author). The funding agency did not play any role in any aspect of the study.

PII: S0301-2115(09)00165-1

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.047

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 144, Issue 2 , Pages 119-123, June 2009