Volume 144, Issue 2 , Pages 149-152, June 2009
The detection of aneuploidy and maternal contamination by QF-PCR in samples undergoing prenatal diagnosis for thalassemia in Southern China
Abstract
Objectives
To apply a simple and low-cost approach, which would easily and accurately detect both the common chromosomal abnormalities and maternal cell contamination (MCC) when invasive prenatal testing is performed for diagnosis of thalassemia.
Study design
Quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was carried out by amplification of microsatellite markers using fluorescence-labelled primers, followed by quantitative analysis of the allele peaks on a genetic analyser. A multiplex of 11 primer pairs for loci on each of chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 was used.
Results
A total of 387 prenatal samples were tested. Five (1.3%) samples showed MCC, including two (0.7%, 2/289) amniotic fluid samples and three (3.1%; 3/98) chorionic villi samples. Of the 379 prenatal samples without MCC, QF-PCR assays detected two (0.5%) cases of trisomy 21, which were confirmed by traditional karyotyping, and missed one case of trisomy 2 mosaicism and one case of monosomy X. The case of trisomy 2 mosaicism was later found to be limited to the placenta, and the case of monosomy X was picked up by ultrasound. There was no clinically significant case that would have been missed if QF-PCR had been used as a stand-alone test instead of karyotyping when invasive prenatal testing was performed for diagnosis of thalassaemia.
Conclusions
The QF-PCR assay could allow simultaneous detection of aneuploidy and possible MCC in the fetal material. This is especially valuable when PCR-based techniques are used in the DNA analysis for thalassaemia. This strategy may be applied to prenatal diagnosis of other recessive disorders.
Keywords: QF-PCR, Prenatal diagnosis, Rapid aneuploidy diagnosis, Maternal cell contamination, Thalassaemia
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0301-2115(09)00232-2
doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.051
© 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Volume 144, Issue 2 , Pages 149-152, June 2009
