Journal Home
Search for

Volume 147, Issue 1, Pages 78-82 (November 2009)


View previous. 19 of 31 View next.

Age-specific differences in the treatment of cervical cancer in the east and the south of The Netherlands 1989–2004

Maaike A. van der AaaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Sabine Sieslinga, Lonneke V. v.d. Poll-Franseb, Eltjo M. Schutterc, Marnix L. Lybeertd, Jan Willem W. Coeberghbe

Received 2 September 2008; received in revised form 7 May 2009; accepted 22 July 2009. published online 12 August 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

This study aims to describe trends and variation in treatment and survival of cervical cancer in two regions in The Netherlands and to relate this to adherence to the treatment recommendations.

Study design

Patient characteristics, tumour characteristics, treatment and follow-up data were collected for 1954 cervical cancer cases diagnosed in the period 1989–2004.

Results

In FIGO stages IB-IIA 93% of patients were treated according to the recommendations of The Netherlands Working Group Gynaecologic Oncology. Older patients received radiotherapy more often than younger patients: 48% (95%CI 40–57) of patients older than 70 compared to 15% (95%CI 10–20) of patients aged 50–69 and 5% (95%CI 3–7) of patients aged 50 or younger (p<0.05). In FIGO stages IIB-IVA 76% of patients were treated according to the recommendations of the Working Group. Chemoradiation was given to older patients less often than to younger patients: 2% (95%CI 0.5–5) versus 23% (95%CI 16–29). A decreased risk of death was found for patients receiving chemoradiation (RER 0.6, 95%CI 0.3–0.9) compared to those receiving “radiotherapy only”.

Conclusion

Far from being always followed, the treatment recommendations were better implemented for treatment of patients with FIGO IB-IIA. Elderly patients received different treatment compared to younger patients in this study and showed an independent increased risk of death in the lower stages, which confirms that the need becomes stronger for paying attention to treatment of elderly patients.

a Comprehensive Cancer Centre North East, Enschede/Groningen, The Netherlands

b Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

c Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Gynaecology, Enschede, The Netherlands

d Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

e Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Comprehensive Cancer Centre North East, PO Box 330, 9700 AH Groningen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 88 2345500; fax: +31 88 2345599.

PII: S0301-2115(09)00471-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.006


View previous. 19 of 31 View next.