European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 147, Issue 1 , Pages 78-82, November 2009

Age-specific differences in the treatment of cervical cancer in the east and the south of The Netherlands 1989–2004

  • Maaike A. van der Aa

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Cancer Centre North East, Enschede/Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Comprehensive Cancer Centre North East, PO Box 330, 9700 AH Groningen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 88 2345500; fax: +31 88 2345599.
  • ,
  • Sabine Siesling

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Cancer Centre North East, Enschede/Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Lonneke V. v.d. Poll-Franse

      Affiliations

    • Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Eltjo M. Schutter

      Affiliations

    • Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Gynaecology, Enschede, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Marnix L. Lybeert

      Affiliations

    • Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jan Willem W. Coebergh

      Affiliations

    • Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    • Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 2 September 2008; received in revised form 7 May 2009; accepted 22 July 2009. published online 12 August 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

This study aims to describe trends and variation in treatment and survival of cervical cancer in two regions in The Netherlands and to relate this to adherence to the treatment recommendations.

Study design

Patient characteristics, tumour characteristics, treatment and follow-up data were collected for 1954 cervical cancer cases diagnosed in the period 1989–2004.

Results

In FIGO stages IB-IIA 93% of patients were treated according to the recommendations of The Netherlands Working Group Gynaecologic Oncology. Older patients received radiotherapy more often than younger patients: 48% (95%CI 40–57) of patients older than 70 compared to 15% (95%CI 10–20) of patients aged 50–69 and 5% (95%CI 3–7) of patients aged 50 or younger (p<0.05). In FIGO stages IIB-IVA 76% of patients were treated according to the recommendations of the Working Group. Chemoradiation was given to older patients less often than to younger patients: 2% (95%CI 0.5–5) versus 23% (95%CI 16–29). A decreased risk of death was found for patients receiving chemoradiation (RER 0.6, 95%CI 0.3–0.9) compared to those receiving “radiotherapy only”.

Conclusion

Far from being always followed, the treatment recommendations were better implemented for treatment of patients with FIGO IB-IIA. Elderly patients received different treatment compared to younger patients in this study and showed an independent increased risk of death in the lower stages, which confirms that the need becomes stronger for paying attention to treatment of elderly patients.

Keywords: Cervical cancer, Hysterectomy, Radiotherapy, Chemoradiation, Survival

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(09)00471-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.006

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 147, Issue 1 , Pages 78-82, November 2009