European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 147, Issue 1 , Pages 83-85 , November 2009

Analysis of outcome in women with borderline glandular change on cervical cytology

  • Bismeen A. Jadoon

      Affiliations

    • Cheltenham General Hospital, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • Sean Kehoe

      Affiliations

    • John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • Kathleen Romain

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cytopathology, Cheltenham General Hospital, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • Colin Clelland

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cellular Pathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • Sudha S. Sundar

      Affiliations

    • Cheltenham General Hospital, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Received 10 February 2009 ,Revised 2 June 2009 ,Accepted 21 July 2009.

References 

  1. Abyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia:meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a1284
  2. Sharpless KE, Schnatz PF, Mandavilli S, et al. Dysplasia associated with atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology. Obstet gynecol. 2005;105:494–500
  3. Working Party of Royal College of pathologists BSCC, NHSCSP. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology. NHSCSP Publication 1995:5.
  4. Cullimore J, Scurr J. The abnormal glandular smear: cytologic prediction, colposcopic correlation and clinical management. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;20:403–407
  5. Mohammed DKA, Lavie O, de Lopes AB, Cross P, Monaghan JM. A clinical review of borderline glandular cells on cervical cytology. BJOG. 2000;107:605–609
  6. Rabb SS, Sinder TE, Potts SA, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability using select cytologic criteria. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107:299–307
  7. Solomon D, Frable WJ, Vooijs GP, et al. ASCUS and AGCUS criteria. International academy of cytology task force summary. Diagnostic cytology towards the 21 century: an international expert conference and tutorial [review]. Acta Cytol. 1998;42:16–24
  8. Veljovich D, Stoler M, Anderson W, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a five year retrospective histopathologic study. Am J Obstet and Gynaecol. 1998;179:382–390
  9. Kennedy AW, Salmieri SS, Wirth SL. Result of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGCUS) detected on cervical cytology screening. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63:14–18

PII: S0301-2115(09)00473-4

doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.007

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 147, Issue 1 , Pages 83-85 , November 2009

Article Tools