European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 147, Issue 1 , Pages 101-105, November 2009

Histological response is not a prognostic factor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer with no residual disease

  • Jean-Guillaume Ferron

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Catherine Uzan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Annie Rey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Sebastien Gouy

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Patricia Pautier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Catherine Lhommé

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Pierre Duvillard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Philippe Morice

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +33 1 42 11 44 39; fax: +33 1 42 11 52 13.

Received 31 March 2009; received in revised form 23 July 2009; accepted 25 July 2009. published online 17 August 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of the histological response at the time of interval debulking surgery (IDS) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for unresectable advanced-stage ovarian cancer (ASOC).

Study design

A retrospective study to select cases fulfilling 4 inclusion criteria: (1) patients with unresectable ASOC; (2) at least 3 courses of platinum and paclitaxel NACT; (3) patients who underwent IDS after NACT and who were free of macroscopic residual disease at the end of debulking surgery and (4) histologic analysis of specimens performed in the same institution. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the histological response to NACT group 1: no histologic residual disease; group 2: persistent residual disease but with marked histological changes and group 3: persistence of at least 1 site with no changes in the tumour. Survival was compared.

Results

Fifty-eight patients (49 stage IIIC and 9 stage IV) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Respectively 8, 14 and 36 patients were in groups 1, 2 and 3. The median duration of follow-up was 41 months. Three-year event-free survival in groups 1, 2 and 3 was respectively: 63%, 12% and 19% (p=.02).

Conclusions

These results suggest that the degree of the histological response has a limited impact on survival when complete debulking surgery is achieved at IDS. The degree of tumour cell viability after initial chemotherapy is not a reliable marker for modifying chemotherapy after debulking surgery in such patients.

Keywords: Ovarian cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Unresectable tumour, Interval debulking surgery, Histological response

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(09)00485-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.016

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 147, Issue 1 , Pages 101-105, November 2009