European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 147, Issue 2 , Pages 195-200, December 2009

Effects of menopausal hormone therapy on hemostatic parameters, blood pressure, and body weight: Open-label comparison of randomized treatment with estradiol plus drospirenone versus estradiol plus norethisterone acetate

  • Wolfgang Junge

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorium für Klinische Forschung GmbH, Raisdorf, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: LKF - Laboratorium für Klinische Forschung GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Straße 25-29, D-24223 Raisdorf, Germany. Tel.: +49 4307 8276 0; fax: +49 4307 8276 79.
  • ,
  • Volker El-Samalouti

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorium für Klinische Forschung GmbH, Raisdorf, Germany
  • ,
  • Christoph Gerlinger

      Affiliations

    • Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Matthias Schaefers

      Affiliations

    • Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany

Received 6 August 2008; received in revised form 30 June 2009; accepted 11 September 2009. published online 25 September 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

Clinical studies have reported changes in hemostatic parameters in women taking menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and a small increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We compared the effects of two different HTs on hemostatic parameters in postmenopausal women.

Study design

An open-label, randomized study conducted at two centers in Germany compared continuous 28-week combined HT with 17β-estradiol 1mg plus drospirenone 2mg (E2/DRSP) daily versus E2 1mg plus norethisterone acetate 0.5mg (E2/NETA) daily in healthy postmenopausal women. Changes in D-dimer levels from baseline to the end of treatment, as well as effects on further parameters of coagulation, fibrinolysis, and global hemostasis, and effects on bleeding pattern, blood pressure, and body weight were evaluated.

Results

D-dimer levels increased by 9.1% (median change) with E2/DRSP (n=29) and by 15.1% with E2/NETA (n=30). Other hemostatic parameters showed <10% median change from baseline in both treatment groups, except for tissue plasminogen activator antigen (E2/DRSP, −1.9%; E2/NETA, −24.2%). Systolic blood pressure decreased from baseline by 6.4mmHg in the E2/DRSP group compared with 0.1mmHg in the E2/NETA group at final examination. Body weight remained stable in the E2/DRSP group (+0.18kg) compared with a slight increase (+1.00kg) in the E2/NETA group. In nonhysterectomized women, the mean number of bleeding/spotting days was 5.2 (2.0 bleeding/3.2 spotting) in the E2/DRSP and 8.2 (4.4 bleeding/3.8 spotting) in the E2/NETA group. Most nonhysterectomized women, however, remained amenorrheic during the study period (E2/DRSP, 68%; E2/NETA, 62%).

Conclusion

Both E2/DRSP and E2/NETA were associated with a minor increase in fibrinolytic activity and a slight change in the concentration of some coagulation factors. Both HTs were well tolerated. The decrease in systolic blood pressure and stable body weight in the E2/DRSP group are consistent with DRSP's anti-aldosterone properties.

Keywords: Menopausal hormone therapy, Drospirenone, Hemostasis, Coronary heart disease, Venous thromboembolism

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(09)00542-9

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.09.004

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 147, Issue 2 , Pages 195-200, December 2009