European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 202-203 , February 2010

Perineal trauma following operative vaginal delivery without episiotomy

  • Felicity Watson

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 07817 737008; fax: +44 01419 453328.

Received 9 September 2008

References 

  1. Youssef R, Ramallingam U, Macleod M, Murphy MJ. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:941–945
  2. Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:1688–1694
  3. de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JPJA, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk of anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:104–108
  4. Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Goyder K, Howarth L, Strachan B. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery—a multi-centre pilot study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:1695–1702discussion 1702–3
  5. Macleod M, Murphy DJ. Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy—a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2008;136:178–183

PII: S0301-2115(09)00552-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.09.014

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 202-203 , February 2010