European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 125-130, February 2010

Diagnosis of placental abruption: relationship between clinical and histopathological findings

  • Denise A. Elsasser

      Affiliations

    • Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States
  • ,
  • Cande V. Ananth

      Affiliations

    • Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 732 235 7940; fax: +1 732 235 6627.
  • ,
  • Vinay Prasad

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Pathology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
  • ,
  • Anthony M. Vintzileos

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY, United States
  • ,
  • For the New Jersey-Placental Abruption Study Investigators

Received 22 July 2009; received in revised form 11 September 2009; accepted 5 October 2009. published online 26 October 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

We evaluated the extent to which histologic lesions bearing a diagnosis of abruption conform to a diagnosis based on established clinical criteria. We further examined the profile of chronic and acute histologic lesions associated with clinical abruption.

Methods

Data from the New Jersey-Placental Abruption Study – a multi-center, case-control study – were utilized to compare the clinical and histologic criteria for abruption. The study was based on 162 women with clinically diagnosed abruption and 173 controls. We examined the concordance between clinical indicators for abruption with those of a histopathological diagnosis. The clinical criteria for a diagnosis of abruption included (i) evidence of retroplacental clot(s); (ii) abruption diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound; or (iii) vaginal bleeding accompanied by nonreassuring fetal status or uterine hypertonicity. The pathological criteria for abruption diagnosis included hematoma, fibrin deposition, compressed villi, and hemosiderin-laden histiocytes in cases with older hematomas. Acute lesions included chorioamnionitis, funisitis, acute deciduitis, meconium stained membranes, villous stromal hemorrhage, and villous edema. Chronic lesions included chronic deciduitis, decidual necrosis, decidual vasculopathy, placental infarctions, villous mal-development (delayed or accelerated maturation), hemosiderin deposition, intervillous thrombus, and chronic villitis.

Results

Of clinically diagnosed cases, the sensitivity and specificity for a histologic confirmation of abruption were 30.2% and 100%, respectively. Presence of retroplacental clots remained the single most common finding (77.1%) among clinically diagnosed cases. Among the acute lesions, chorioamnionitis and funisitis were associated with abruption. The only chronic histologic lesion associated with abruption was placental infarctions.

Conclusions

The concordance between clinical and pathologic criteria for abruption diagnosis is poor. The criteria for diagnosing a clinical abruption should include sonographic visualization of abruption, evidence of retroplacental clots, or vaginal bleeding accompanied by nonreassuring fetal status or uterine hypertonicity.

Keywords: Placental abruption, Histopathologic lesions, Chronic etiology, Villous maturation, Villous dysmaturity, Infarctions, Abruption diagnosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(09)00597-1

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.005

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 125-130, February 2010