European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 177-181, February 2010

Clinical and morphological factors predictive of occult involvement of the nipple-areola complex in mastectomy specimens

  • Paulo R. Pirozzi

      Affiliations

    • ABC School of Medicine, Av. Príncipe de Gales, 821, Santo André 09060-650, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Claudia Rossetti

      Affiliations

    • ABC School of Medicine, Av. Príncipe de Gales, 821, Santo André 09060-650, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Ivo Carelli

      Affiliations

    • ABC School of Medicine, Av. Príncipe de Gales, 821, Santo André 09060-650, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Carlos A. Ruiz

      Affiliations

    • São Paulo University School of Medicine, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Luciano M. Pompei

      Affiliations

    • ABC School of Medicine, Av. Príncipe de Gales, 821, Santo André 09060-650, SP, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Rua Dona Adma Jafet 74, cj. 51, Sao Paulo 01308-050, SP, Brazil. Tel.: +55 11 3259 0005; fax: +55 11 2548 3316.
  • ,
  • Sebastião Piato

      Affiliations

    • Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Jr., 61, São Paulo 01221-020, SP, Brazil

Received 4 May 2009; received in revised form 28 September 2009; accepted 19 October 2009. published online 09 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To evaluate characteristics predictive of nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement by the breast tumor.

Study design

Cases of infiltrative ductal carcinoma (stages I, IIA and IIB) treated by mastectomy in which the distance between the tumor and the NAC was ≥2cm were included. NAC involvement was evaluated using serial histological sections. The distance between the tumor and the NAC was measured on mammograms. Other parameters taken into consideration were: tumor size, histological and nuclear grades, vascular invasion, and the presence of an in situ component. For comparisons between categorical variables, the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used. Student's t-test was used for numerical variables with normal distribution and the Mann–Whitney U-test was applied when distribution was not normal.

Results

Fifty patients were included. NAC was affected in 12 and unaffected in 38. There was no statistically significant difference in mean age between the unaffected and affected groups (58.9±13.5 years versus 55.8±12.5 years, p=0.477); however, 13.2% and 58.3% (p=0.046) in the NAC-unaffected and NAC-affected groups, respectively, were <50 years of age. Distance ≤3cm between the tumor and the NAC on mammograms was found in 60.5% of the NAC-unaffected group and in 100% of the NAC-affected group (p=0.007). With respect to the in situ component, there was a difference between the NAC-unaffected and NAC-affected groups regarding micropapillary pattern (13.2% versus 50.0%; p=0.014) and extensive in situ component (13.2% versus 41.7%; p=0.046). No statistically significant difference was found for any of the other parameters analyzed.

Conclusions

A distance between the tumor and the NAC ≤3cm, age <50 years, and ductal carcinoma in situ with micropapillary pattern or with an extensive in situ component were factors significantly associated with a higher likelihood of NAC involvement.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Mastectomy, Occult nipple involvement, Nipple-areola complex, Breast reconstruction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(09)00637-X

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.021

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 177-181, February 2010