European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 144-146, February 2010

Polymorphisms of FAS and FAS ligand genes in preeclamptic women

  • Pasquapina Ciarmela

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular Pathology and Innovative Therapies, Faculty of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, via Tronto 10/a, 60020 Ancona, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 0712206270; fax: +39 0712206087.
  • ,
  • Sonia Boschi

      Affiliations

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • ,
  • Enrrico Bloise

      Affiliations

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • ,
  • Luca Marozio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Chiara Benedetto

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Mario Castellucci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular Pathology and Innovative Therapies, Faculty of Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, via Tronto 10/a, 60020 Ancona, Italy
  • ,
  • Felice Petraglia

      Affiliations

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Received 3 February 2009; received in revised form 24 June 2009; accepted 20 October 2009. published online 09 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

This study investigated the influence that Fas and Fas ligand gene polymorphisms might have on preeclampsia. The pathogenesis of preeclampsia is still enigmatic and several studies have proposed that it may, in part, be determined by genetic susceptibility. Therefore, the identification of a gene polymorphism associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia might well represent a useful tool in the identification of at risk pregnant women enabling the setup of preventive therapy.

Apoptosis has also been implied in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia and since Fas and Fas ligand are the main apoptotic pathway members, they may represent candidate genes involved in the development of preeclampsia.

A polymorphism at the 670 position (A–G) in the Fas gene has been found more frequently in Hungarian women with preeclampsia.

Study design

The study cohort was a group of 50 women with preeclampsia and 142 healthy control subjects from the general Italian population. They were studied, by RFLP analysis, to validate the role that the 670 G Fas gene polymorphism plays in preeclampsia, and to evaluate the Fas ligand IVS2nt 124 G polymorphism. The Fisher's exact test was used to compute the statistical difference between groups.

Results

The presence of the 670 G Fas gene variant was observed in 42 preeclamptic patients (84%) and 96 members of the general population control group (67.6%) (p=0.029). Regarding the Fas ligand gene, the IVS2nt 124 G variant was present in 14 preeclamptic patients (28%) and in 47 of the general population control subjects (33.1%) (p=0.6).

Conclusions

The present study validated the hypothesis that the Fas 670 G variant may have an influencing role in preeclampsia.

Keywords: Fas, Fas ligand, Preeclampsia, Genetic polymorphism, Pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(09)00642-3

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.026

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 148, Issue 2 , Pages 144-146, February 2010