European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 143-146 , April 2010

First-trimester prenatal diagnosis performed on pregnant women with fetal ultrasound abnormalities: The reliability of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on mesenchymal core for the main aneuploidies

  • J. Toutain

      Affiliations

    • Fetal Medicine Center, University Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
    • University Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France
    • ,
  • M. Epiney

      Affiliations

    • Fetal Medicine Center, University Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
    • ,
  • M. Begorre

      Affiliations

    • Fetal Medicine Center, University Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
    • University Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France
    • ,
  • H. Dessuant

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cytogenetics, Biomnis Laboratory, Paris, France
    • ,
  • F. Vandenbossche

      Affiliations

    • Fetal Medicine Center, University Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
    • ,
  • J. Horovitz

      Affiliations

    • Fetal Medicine Center, University Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
    • University Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France
    • ,
  • R. Saura

      Affiliations

    • Fetal Medicine Center, University Hospitals, Bordeaux, France
    • University Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Service de génétique médicale – Maternité Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France. Tel.: +33 5 56 79 55 58; fax: +33 5 56 79 48 15.

Received 17 August 2009 ,Revised 12 November 2009 ,Accepted 11 December 2009.

References 

  1. Brun JL, Mangione R, Gangbo F, et al. Feasibility, accuracy and safety of chorionic villus sampling: a report of 10741 cases. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:295–301
  2. Van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Brandenburg H, et al. Accuracy of abnormal karyotypes after the analysis of both short- and long-term culture of chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20:956–969
  3. Klinger K, Landes G, Shook D, et al. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51:55–65
  4. Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Vad M, et al. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured chorionic villus samples by FISH. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;59:918–926
  5. Goumy C, Bonnet-Dupeyron MN, Cherasse Y, et al. Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for a rapid first-trimester prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24:249–256
  6. Locatelli A, Mariani S, Ciriello E, et al. Role of FISH on uncultured amniocytes for the diagnosis of aneuploidies in the presence of fetal anomalies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2005;20:1–4
  7. Shaffer LG, Bui TH. Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007;145C:87–98
  8. Waters JJ, Mann K, Grimsley L, et al. Complete discrepancy between QF-PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVS. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:332–339
  9. Witters I, Devriendt K, Legius E, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 5049 consecutive uncultured amniotic fluid samples by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:29–33
  10. Jackson L, Gibas LM, Barr MA. Preparation of metaphase spreads from chorionic villus samples. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2001;8:8.3
  11. Van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Polak-Knook J, Galjaard RJ. (Potential) false-negative diagnoses in chorionic villi and a review of literature. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26:401–408
  12. Kennerknecht I, Barbi G, Wolf M, et al. Cytogenetic diagnoses after chorionic villus sampling are less reliable in very-high-or very-low-risk pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 1993;13:929–944
  13. Kennerknecht I, Barbi G, Djalali M, et al. False-negative findings in chorionic villus sampling. An experimental approach and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1276–1282
  14. Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)--diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986-1992. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17:801–820
  15. Saura R, Gauthier B, Taine L, et al. Operator experience and fetal loss rate in transabdominal CVS. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14:70–71
  16. Newport M, Coleman DV, McPherson K. Estimation of the weight of chorionic villus samples obtained from first trimester pregnancies by transcervical aspiration. Prenat Diagn. 1986;6:265–269
  17. Smidt-Jensen S, Christensen B, Lind AM. Chorionic villus culture for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome defects: reduction of the long-term cultivation time. Prenat Diagn. 1989;9:309–319
  18. Simoni G, Brambati B, Danesino C, et al. Efficient direct chromosome analyses and enzyme determinations from chorionic villi samples in the first trimester of pregnancy. Hum Genet. 1983;63:349–357
  19. Saura R, Roux D, Maugey-Laulom B, et al. False-negative results of trisomy 21 on direct analysis on chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:886–887
  20. Kalousek DK, Dill FJ. Chromosomal mosaicism confined to the placenta in human conceptions. Science. 1983;221:665–667
  21. Miny P, Basaran S, Pawlowitzki IH, et al. Validity of cytogenetic analyses from trophoblast tissue throughout gestation. Am J Med Genet. 1989;33:136–141
  22. Kooper AJ, Faas BH, Feuth T, et al. Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11:17–24
  23. Nicolaides KH. Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:45–67
  24. Mansfield ES. Diagnosis of Down syndrome and other aneuploidies using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and small tandem repeat polymorphisms. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:43–50
  25. Rickman L, Fiegler H, Carter NP, Bobrow M. Prenatal diagnosis by array-CGH. Eur J Med Genet. 2005;48:232–240
  26. Slater HR, Bruno DL, Ren H, Pertile M, Schouten JP, Choo KH. Rapid, high throughput prenatal detection of aneuploidy using a novel quantitative method (MLPA). J Med Genet. 2003;40:907–912
  27. Lau ET, Tang L, Wong C, et al. Assessing discrepant findings between QF-PCR on uncultured prenatal samples and karyotyping on long-term culture. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:151–155

PII: S0301-2115(09)00737-4

doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.015

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 143-146 , April 2010

Article Tools