European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 159-164, April 2010

Decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesareans in the Aurore perinatal network

  • Cyril Huissoud

      Affiliations

    • Hospices Civils de Lyon Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon Cedex 04, France
    • INSERM U846, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, 18 Avenue Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France Université de Lyon, Lyon 1, UMR-S 846, 69003 Lyon, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Hospices Civils de Lyon Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon Cedex 04, France. Tel.: +33 472 072 909; fax: +33 472 072 553.
  • ,
  • Corinne Dupont

      Affiliations

    • Pôle IMER – Information Médicale, Evaluation, Recherche –, Avenue Lacassagne, 69003 Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Florence Canoui-Poitrine

      Affiliations

    • Pôle IMER – Information Médicale, Evaluation, Recherche –, Avenue Lacassagne, 69003 Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Sandrine Touzet

      Affiliations

    • Pôle IMER – Information Médicale, Evaluation, Recherche –, Avenue Lacassagne, 69003 Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Gil Dubernard

      Affiliations

    • Hospices Civils de Lyon Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon Cedex 04, France
  • ,
  • René-Charles Rudigoz

      Affiliations

    • Hospices Civils de Lyon Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon Cedex 04, France
    • Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 – U.E.R., Lyon-Nord – 8, Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France
    • INSERM 4129, Santé individu société, France

Received 29 March 2009; received in revised form 26 November 2009; accepted 24 December 2009. published online 11 January 2010.

Abstract 

Objectives

To determine the interval between decision and delivery (DDI) for urgent and very urgent caesarean deliveries within a perinatal network, to compare the results according to maternity ward level and organisation, and to assess the impact of DDI on neonatal outcome.

Study design

Prospective observational study in the 31 maternity units of the Aurore perinatal network (17 Level I, 12 Level II, and two Level III). The obstetric team defined the degree of urgency for the caesareans, measured the DDI, and reported neonatal outcome.

Results

The study includes 666 unplanned caesarean sections. The median DDI for emergency caesareans (n=365) was 48min for Level I units, 40min for Level II, and 22min for Level III (P<0.05). For the very urgent caesareans (n=82), the median DDI was respectively 35, 24, and 13min (P<0.05) and the percentage with a DDI30min were 45%, 62%, and 100% (P<0.05). The proportion of DDI30min was 0% in maternity units where obstetricians and anaesthetists were not always onsite, 67% when only the anaesthetist was always present (P<0.05) and 88% for units where both were always present. The neonate's condition did not differ significantly according to DDI.

Conclusions

DDI varies very substantially according to the level and organisation of the maternity units in the Aurore network. It was not significantly correlated with neonatal outcome in our population.

Keywords: Caesarean, Emergency, Decision-to-delivery interval, Perinatal network

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-2115(10)00003-5

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.033

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 149, Issue 2 , Pages 159-164, April 2010