European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 175-179 , June 2010

Vaginal progesterone supplementation has no effect on ongoing pregnancy rate in hCG-induced natural frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles

  • Dimitra Kyrou

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: V.U.B/C.R.G., Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. Tel.: +32 2 477 6699; fax: +32 2 477 6333.
  • ,
  • Human M. Fatemi

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Biljana Popovic-Todorovic

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Etienne Van den Abbeel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Embryology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Michel Camus

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Paul Devroey

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

Received 1 December 2009 ,Revised 19 January 2010 ,Accepted 15 February 2010.

References 

  1. Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305:707–709
  2. Morozov V, Ruman J, Kenigsberg D, Moodie G, Brenner J. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. J Ass Reprod Genet. 2007;24:119–123
  3. Ghobara T, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen–thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database. 2008;23:CD003414
  4. Kawamura T, Motoyama H, Yanaihara A, et al. Clinical outcomes of two different endometrial preparation methods for cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a normal menstrual. Reprod Med Biol. 2007;6:53–57
  5. Schmidt CL, de Ziegler D, Gagliardi CL, et al. Transfer of cryo-preserved-thawed embryos: the natural cycle versus controlled preparation of the endometrium with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and exogenous estradiol and progesterone (GEEP). Fertil Steril. 1989;52:609–616
  6. Loh SKE, Leong NKY. Factors affecting success in an embryo cryopreservation programme. Ann Acad Med. 1999;28:260–265
  7. Oehninger S, Mayer J, Muasher S. Impact of different clinical variables on pregnancy outcome following embryo cryopreservation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000;169:73–77
  8. Miyake A, Aono T, Kawamura Y, Kurachi K. Suppression of plasma luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone by administration of human chorionic gonadotropin in castrated women. Fertil Steril. 1982;36:251–252
  9. Casper RF, Yen SSC. Induction of luteolysis in the human with a long-acting analog of luteinizing hormone-releasing factor. Science. 1979;205:408–410
  10. Tavaniotou A, Devroey P. Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on luteal luteinizing hormone concentrations in natural cycles. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:654–655
  11. Zayed F, Lenton EA, Cooke ID. Natural cycle in-vitro fertilization in couples with unexplained infertility: impact of various factors on outcome. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2402–2407
  12. Kosmas IP, Janssens R, De Munck L. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1327–1334
  13. Van Landuyt L, De Vos A, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem . Blastocyst formation in in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: influence of the fertilization procedure. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1397–1403
  14. Van Den Abbeel E, Van Steirteghem A. Zona pellucida damage to human embryos after cryopreservation and the consequences for their blastomere survival and in-vitro viability. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:373–378
  15. Orvieto R, Meltcer S, Volodarski M, et al. Luteal phase support for patients undergoing frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles—the required progesterone dose. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2007;34:25–26
  16. Jones GS. Luteal phase defect: a review of pathophysiology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1991;3:641–648
  17. Duffy DM, Stewart DR, Stouffer RL. Titrating luteinizing hormone replacement to sustain the structure and function of the corpus luteum after gonadotropin–releasing hormone antagonist treatment in rhesus monkeys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:342–349
  18. Kyle CV, Griffin A, Jarrett A, Odell WD. Inability to demonstrate an ultrashort loop feedback mechanism for luteinizing hormone in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69:170–176
  19. Fauser BC, Devroey P. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14:236–242
  20. Urman B, Balaban B, Yakin K. Impact of fresh-cycle variables on the implantation potential of cryopreserved-thawed human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:310–315
  21. El Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Al-Darazi K, et al. Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1313–1318
  22. Salumets A, Suikkari AM, Makinen S, et al. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2368–2374
  23. Salha O, Dada T, Levett V, Allagr V, Sharma V. The influence of supernumerary embryos on the clinical outcome of IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:335–343
  24. El Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Khairy M, et al. The relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of medicated frozen embryo replacement. Fertil Steril. 2006;89:832–839

PII: S0301-2115(10)00104-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.038

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 175-179 , June 2010