Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 116, ISSUE 1, P63-66, September 10, 2004

Effect of cryopreservation on quality and fertilization capacity of human sperm

  • N Marcus-Braun
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +972-8-6518954; fax: +972-8-6519492.
    Affiliations
    IVF Unit, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 151, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • G Braun
    Affiliations
    IVF Unit, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 151, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • G Potashnik
    Affiliations
    IVF Unit, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 151, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • I Har-vardi
    Affiliations
    IVF Unit, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 151, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Objective: To analyze retrospectively the effect of cryopreservation on donor’s sperm. Study design: Data were collected on 178 cryopreserved-thawed sperm specimens from 44 donors and 624 oocytes from 62 women, which underwent in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatments with donor’s sperm. Data on fresh sperm, 175 sperm specimens from 76 couples which underwent IVF-ET treatments, were used as a control group. Semen analysis was done by cell concentration, percent of motility, and quality of motility according to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation. Sperm quality parameters which had the strongest impact on fertilization capacity were determined using the statistical response surface model and conjoint analysis. Results: Passing sperm through Percoll column decreased sperm concentration, with no improvement in sperm motility but with a slight increase in quality of motility. Quality of motility of donor’s sperm had the strongest impact on fertilization capacity. Conclusion: Current freezing–thawing protocols of sperm cause a decrease in sperm parameters without affecting fertilization capacity. Furthermore, quality of motility of frozen–thawed sperm seems to be a significant measure of sperm fertilization capacity.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Barratt C.L.R
        • Clements S
        • Kessopoulou E
        Semen characteristics and fertility tests required for storage of spermatozoa.
        Hum. Reprod. 1998; 13: 1-7
        • Polge C
        • Smith A.U
        • Parker A.S
        Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperature.
        Nature. 1949; 164: 666-667
        • Bunge R.G
        • Sherman J.K
        Fertilization capacity of frozen human spermatozoa.
        Nature. 1953; 172: 767
      1. Ragni G, Lombroso Finzi GC, Caccamo A, Dalla Serra A, Crosignani PG. Enhanced sperm quality with TEST-yolk buffer: preliminary results in intraperitoneal insemination for male infertility. In: Proceedings of the Abstracts of the 7th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Paris; Hum Reprod 1991;6:421.

        • Royere D
        • Barthelemy C
        • Hamamah S
        • Lansac J
        Cryopreservation of spermatozoa: a 1996 review.
        Hum. Reprod. Update. 1996; 2: 553-559
        • Smith K.D
        • Rodriguez-Rigau L.J
        • Steinberger E
        The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of artificial insemination donor (AID) with fresh or cryopreserved semen.
        Fertil. Steril. 1981; 36: 496-502
        • Subak L.L
        • Adamson G.D
        • Boltz N.L
        Therapeutic donor insemination: a prospective randomized trial of fresh versus frozen sperm.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992; 70: 313-316
        • Ashkenazi J
        • Dicker D
        • Feldberg D
        • Goldman J.A
        Fresh versus frozen thawed semen for initial and late insemination in IVF-ET cycles.
        Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1991; 42: 115-117
        • Lansac J
        • Thepot F
        • Mayaux M.J
        • Czyglick F
        • Wack T
        • Selva J
        • et al.
        Pregnancy outcome after artificial insemination or IVF-ET with frozen semen donor: a collaborative study of the French CECOS Federation on 21597 pregnancies.
        Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1997; 74: 223-228
        • Stanic P
        • Tandara M
        • Sonicki Z
        • Simunic V
        • Radakovic B
        • Suchanek E
        Comparison of protective media and freezing techniques for cryopreservation of human semen.
        Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2000; 91: 65-70
        • Ranganathan P
        • Mahran A.M
        • Hallak J
        • Agarwal A
        Sperm cryopreservation for men with nonmalignant, systemic diseases: a descriptive study.
        J. Androl. 2002; 23: 71-75
        • Hammadeh M.E
        • Greiner S
        • Rosenbaum P
        • Schmidt W
        Comparison between human sperm preservation medium and TEST-yolk buffer on protecting chromatin and morphology integrity of human spermatozoa in fertile and subfertile men after freeze-thawing procedure.
        J. Androl. 2001; 22: 1012-1018
        • Kelly M.P
        • Corson S.L
        • Gocial B
        • Batzer F.R
        • Gutmann J.N
        Discontinuous Percoll gradient preparation for donor insemination: determinants for success.
        Hum. Reprod. 1997; 12: 2682-2686
        • Jeyendran R.S
        • Gunawardana V.K
        • Barisic D
        • Wentz A.C
        TEST-yolk media and sperm quality.
        Hum. Reprod. 1995; 1: 73-79
        • Van den Eede B
        Investigation and treatment of infertile cauples ESHRE guidelines.
        Hum. Reprod. Update. 1995; 10: 1246-1271
      2. Rust RT, Oliver RL. On the measurement of perceived service quality. In: DeSarbo WS, Huff L, Rolandelli MM, editors. Service quality: new direction in theory and practice. London: Sage; 1994. p. 201–22.

        • Danaher P.J
        Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative importance of service attributes measured in customer satisfaction surveys.
        J. Retailing. 1997; 73: 235-260
        • Moon Kang A
        • Tsung-Chieh J
        Effect of age on intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 88: 93-98
        • Ericsson S.A
        • Garner D.L
        • Redelman D
        • Ahmad K
        Assessment of the viability and fertilizing potential of cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa using dual fluorescent staining and two flow cytometric systems.
        Gamete Res. 1989; 22: 355-368
        • MacLaughlin E.A
        • Ford W.C.L
        • Hull M.G.R
        Adenosine triphosphate and motility characteristics of fresh and cryopreserved human spermatozoa.
        Int. J. Androl. 1994; 17: 71-76
      3. Ragni G, Vegrtti W. In: Fertility and Sterility Proceedings of the 15th world Congress of FDS (France). The Parthenon Publishing Group; 1995. p. 317–20.

        • Ren D
        • Navarro B
        • Perez G
        • Jackson A.C
        • Hsu S
        • Shi Q
        A sperm ion channel required for sperm motility and male fertility.
        Nature. 2001; 413: 603-609
        • Quill T.A
        • Ren D
        • Clapham D.E
        • Garbers D.L
        • Quill T.A
        A voltage-gated ion chanel expressed specifically in spermatozoa.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001; 98: 12527-12531