Abstract
Objective:
To determine an appropriate cutoff value to differentiate physiologic and pathologic
birth weight discordance, to determine the prevalence of birth weight discordance
≥25% among twin pregnancies in different sub-populations, and to examine its clinical
significance.
Study design:
Historical cohort study of 147,262 twin sets registered in the United States between
1995 and 1997.
Results:
The prevalence of birth weight discordance ≥25% among twin pregnancies was 8.6%. The
prevalence of birth weight discordance ≥25% was significantly decreased with increasing
total twin birth weight deciles, was more frequently found in twins with discordant
gender (9.1%) than in those twins with concordant gender (8.3%) and in mothers whose
age was 30 years or older (9.1%) than those of younger mothers (8.1%). Birth weight
discordance ≥25% was associated with earlier gestational age at delivery (35.0 weeks
versus 36.0 weeks) and higher neonatal mortality (5.4% versus 2.3%) as compared to
twins with lower birth weight discordance.
Conclusions:
The prevalence of birth weight discordance ≥25% among twin pregnancies was 8.6%, which
is associated with lower gestational age at delivery and higher neonatal mortality
rates, and may represent a pathologic process.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Reference
- The effect of birth weight discordance on twin neonatal mortality.Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101: 570-574
- Adaptive growth restriction as a pattern of birth weight discordance in twin gestations.Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 986-990
- Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in the United States: the role of intrapair birth weight discordance.Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100: 474-480
- Discordant birthweight and late fetal death in like-sexed and unlike-sexed twin pairs: a population-based study.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 765-769
- Is discordant growth in twins an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome?.Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 71-76
- What is twin birthweight discordance?.Am J Perinatol. 1990; 7: 217-219
- Outcome of twin pregnancies according to intrapair birth weight differences.Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94: 1006-1010
- The significance of birth weight difference in discordant twins: a level to standardize?.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998; 77: 28-31
- The definition, diagnosis, and management of growth-discordant twins: an international census survey.Acta Genet Med Gemellol. 1991; 40: 345-351
National Center for Health Statistics. 1995–1997 Matched Multiple Birth data set. NCHS CD-ROM Series 21, No. 12. Hyattsville, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000.
- Placental pathology in discordant twins.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169: 931-935
- Risk factors for intrapair birth weight discordance in twins.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003; 13: 230-236
- Twin birth weight discordance and risk of preterm birth.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 63-67
- Intertwin birth weight discordance as a potential adaptive measure to promote gestational age.J Reprod Med. 2003; 48: 449-454
- Birth weight discordance, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal outcomes in twins.J Reprod Med. 1994; 39: 504-508
- The relation between inter-twin birth weight discordance and total twin birth weight.Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93: 113-116
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
October 11,
2004
Received in revised form:
September 9,
2004
Received:
June 25,
2004
Identification
Copyright
© 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.