The recent article by Altunyurt et al. [
[1]
] is the first randomised controlled trial assessing whether a coil should be removed
in those women who present with pelvic inflammatory disease. It, therefore, has the
potential to influence national and international guidelines on the management of
pelvic inflammatory disease.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Reference
- Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 107: 81-84
Article info
Publication history
Received:
January 4,
2005
Identification
Copyright
© 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Reply to the Comment by Professor Jonathan D.C. RossEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyVol. 171Issue 2
- PreviewWe are grateful to Professor Ross for giving us the chance to replace some incorrect data and misprints and to clarify insufficient explanations in this article. I will try to answer all of the questions.Q: How many women were approached to take part in the study but declined?A: Twenty-two women declined to take part in the study.Q: What objective criteria were used to enter women into the study?A: The presence of pelvic pain and cervical tenderness (dislocation pain) were used to make a diagnosis of PID.
- Full-Text
- Preview
