Advertisement
Review| Volume 144, ISSUE 1, P3-7, May 2009

Download started.

Ok

Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: A meta-analysis

Published:February 02, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.01.003

      Abstract

      Hysterectomy is a very common gynaecological procedure. The vaginal route is considered preferable for hysterectomy, although the ideal route for women unsuitable for the vaginal approach remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomised controlled trials to compare outcomes in total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign disease. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated for categorical variables using random effects models as per Der Simonian and Laird. Continuous variables were compared by means of weighted mean differences (WMD). TLH is associated with reduced overall peri-operative complications (pooled OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07–0.50) and reduced estimated blood loss (WMD −183 ml; 95% CI −346 ml to −21 ml; p = 0.03). Additionally, there are trends towards shorter hospital stay (WMD −2.5 days; 95% CI −5.1 days to 0.01 days; p = 0.05) and post-operative haematoma formation (pooled OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.03–1.01) compared to TAH. The only trade-off appears to be a longer operating time in the TLH group (WMD 22 min; 95% CI 5–39 min; p = 0.01). Rates of major complication were not statistically different (pooled OR 1.35; 95% CI 0.32–5.73) though this analysis is likely underpowered to detect many major complications. As such, TLH appears to offer benefits to women requiring total hysterectomy for benign indications compared to TAH, particularly regarding minor complications, blood loss and hospital stay. However, larger studies are needed to assess the impact on major intra-operative complications and long-term clinical outcomes, particularly pelvic organ prolapse.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Wu J.M.
        • Wechter M.E.
        • Geller E.J.
        • Nguyen T.V.
        • Visco A.G.
        Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1091-1095
        • Whiteman M.K.
        • Hillis S.D.
        • Jamieson D.J.
        • et al.
        Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198: 34e1-347e
        • Clayton R.D.
        Hysterectomy.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 20 ([Review]): 73-87
        • Reich H.
        • DeCaprio J.
        • McGlynn F.
        Laparoscopic hysterectomy.
        J Gynecol Surg. 1989; 5: 213-216
        • Reich H.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 19: 337-344
        • Johnson N.
        • Barlow D.
        • Lethaby A.
        • Tavender E.
        • Curr E.
        • Garry R.
        Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; ([Review]): CD003677
        • Brill A.I.
        Hysterectomy in the 21st century: different approaches, different challenges.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49 ([Review]): 722-735
        • Garry R.
        • Fountain J.
        • Mason S.
        • et al.
        The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.
        BMJ. 2004; 328 ([Epub 2004 January 7]): 129
        • Englund M.
        • Robson S.
        Why has the acceptance of laparoscopic hysterectomy been slow? Results of an anonymous survey of Australian gynecologists.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14: 724-728
        • Moher D.
        • Cook D.J.
        • Eastwood S.
        • Olkin I.
        • Rennie D.
        • Stroup D.F.
        Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.
        Lancet. 1999; 354 (Review): 1896-1900
        • Jadad A.R.
        • Moore R.A.
        • Carroll D.
        • et al.
        Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?.
        Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17: 1-12
        • Hur H.C.
        • Guido R.S.
        • Mansuria S.M.
        • Hacker M.R.
        • Sanfilippo J.S.
        • Lee T.T.
        Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14: 311-317
        • DerSimonian R.
        • Laird N.
        Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
        Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177-188
        • Chapron C.
        • Fernandez B.
        • Dubuisson J.B.
        Total hysterectomy for benign pathologies: direct costs comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000; 89: 141-147
        • Bonilla D.J.
        • Mains L.
        • Whitaker R.
        • Crawford B.
        • Finan M.
        • Magnus M.
        Uterine weight as a predictor of morbidity after a benign abdominal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
        J Reprod Med. 2007; 52: 490-498
        • Schindlbeck C.
        • Klauser K.
        • Dian D.
        • Janni W.
        • Friese K.
        Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008; 277: 331-337
        • Ellstrom M.A.
        • Astrom M.
        • Moller A.
        • Olsson J.H.
        • Hahlin M.
        A randomized trial comparing changes in psychological well-being and sexuality after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82: 871-875
        • Ellström M.
        • Olsén M.F.
        • Olsson J.H.
        • Nordberg G.
        • Bengtsson A.
        • Hahlin M.
        Pain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998; 77: 923-928
        • Ellstrom M.
        • Ferraz-Nunes J.
        • Hahlin M.
        • Olsson J.H.
        A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91: 30-34
        • Olsson J.H.
        • Ellstrom M.
        • Hahlin M.
        A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103: 345-350
        • Seracchioli R.
        • Venturoli S.
        • Vianello F.
        • et al.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in the presence of a large uterus.
        J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002; 9: 333-338
        • Perino A.
        • Cucinella G.
        • Venezia R.
        • Castelli A.
        • Cittadini E.
        Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study.
        Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 2996-2999
        • Ribeiro S.C.
        • Ribeiro R.M.
        • Santos N.C.
        • Pinotti J.A.
        A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003; 83: 37-43
        • Kluivers K.B.
        • Hendriks J.C.
        • Mol B.W.
        • et al.
        Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14: 145-152
        • Wattiez A.
        • Soriano D.
        • Cohen S.B.
        • et al.
        The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases.
        J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002; 9: 339-345
        • Makinen J.
        • Johansson J.
        • Tomas C.
        • et al.
        Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach.
        Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 1473-1478
        • Ferrari M.M.
        • Berlanda N.
        • Mezzopane R.
        • Ragusa G.
        • Cavallo M.
        • Pardi G.
        Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
        BJOG. 2000; 107: 620-625
        • Marana R.
        • Busacca M.
        • Zupi E.
        • Garcea N.
        • Paparella P.
        • Catalano G.F.
        Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180: 270-275
        • McPherson K.
        • Metcalfe M.A.
        • Herbert A.
        • et al.
        Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study.
        BJOG. 2004; 111: 688-694
        • Kim D.H.
        • Bae D.H.
        • Hur M.
        • Kim S.H.
        Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
        J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998; 5: 253-260
        • Drahonovsky J.
        • Pan M.
        • Baresova S.
        • Kucera E.
        • Feyereisl J.
        Clinical comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopy hysterectomy (TLH) in women with benign disease of uterus—a prospective randomized study.
        Ceska Gynekol. 2006; 71 ([Czech]): 431-437
        • Long C.Y.
        • Fang J.H.
        • Chen W.C.
        • Su J.H.
        • Hsu S.C.
        Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
        Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002; 53: 214-219
        • Donnez O.
        • Jadoul P.
        • Squifflet J.
        • Donnez J.
        A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.
        BJOG. 2008; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Altman D.
        • Falconer C.
        • Cnattingius S.
        • Granath F.
        Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198: 572.e1-572.e6