Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades



      Anal sphincter rupture is a serious complication of a vaginal delivery. A considerable number of women suffer permanent anal incontinence after this type of injury. The incidence of sphincter tears is believed to have increased over several decades in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland, but there seem to be significant differences in the incidence rates among these countries. The aim of this study is to compare frequency of anal sphincter tears among the four Nordic countries, and to discuss the possible reasons for the development.

      Study design

      Ecological register study. Anal sphincter ruptures are registered as third and fourth degree perineal tears in the national birth and hospital registries in the Nordic countries. Data from these registries were sampled from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. The incidences of anal sphincter ruptures were calculated as percentages of all vaginal deliveries and caesarean sections were excluded. The test of relative proportions, Chi-square and linear regression modelling were used to study the difference between countries and time trends.


      The frequency of anal sphincter rupture was significantly higher in three countries, Denmark 3.6%, Norway 4.1% and Sweden 4.2%, compared to Finland 0.6%. The trend was clearly increasing from the early 1970s in all countries.


      There is a significant difference in the Nordic countries in the incidence of anal sphincter tears and a significant increment in the incidence over three decades. Our hypothesis is that change in the routines during labour may be one reason for this increment. Higher episiotomy frequency in Finland may be one contributing reason. We assume that there has been a change in the conduct of labour during the last decades, and protecting the perineum may have lost its importance in the three Nordic countries, while the classic method of protecting perineum is still in use in Finland.


      ASR (anal sphincter rupture)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


        • Norderval S.
        • Nsubuga D.
        • Bjelke C.
        • Frasunek J.
        • Myklebust I.
        • Vonen B.
        Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: incidence in a Norwegian county.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004; 83: 989-994
        • Sultan A.H.
        • Kamm M.A.
        • Hudson C.N.
        • Bartram C.I.
        Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair.
        BMJ. 1994; 308: 887-891
        • Sangalli M.R.
        • Floris L.
        • Faltin D.
        • Weil A.
        Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveries.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 40: 244-248
        • Anthony S.
        • Buitendijk S.E.
        • Zondervan K.T.
        • van Rijssel E.J.
        • Verkerk P.H.
        Episiotomies and the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 1064-1067
        • Aukee P.
        • Sundstrom H.
        • Kairaluoma M.V.
        The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85: 856-860
        • Poen A.C.
        • Felt-Bersma R.J.
        • Dekker G.A.
        • Deville W.
        • Cuesta M.A.
        • Meuwissen S.G.
        Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 563-566
        • Pirhonen J.P.
        • Grenman S.E.
        • Haadem K.
        • et al.
        Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland—result of difference in manual help to the baby's head.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998; 77: 974-977
        • Baghestan E.
        • Bordahl P.E.
        • Rasmussen S.A.
        • Sande A.K.
        • Lyslo I.
        • Solvang I.
        A validation of the diagnosis of obstetric sphincter tears in two Norwegian databases, the Medical Birth Registry and the Patient Administration System.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 205-209
        • Tetzschner T.
        • Sorensen M.
        • Lose G.
        • Christiansen J.
        Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103: 1034-1040
        • Cnattingius S.
        • Ericson A.
        • Gunnarskog J.
        • Kallen B.
        A quality study of a medical birth registry.
        Scand J Soc Med. 1990; 18: 143-148
        • Gissler M.
        • Louhiala P.
        • Hemminki E.
        Nordic Medical Birth Registers in epidemiological research.
        Eur J Epidemiol. 1997; 13: 169-175
        • Moller Bek K.
        • Laurberg S.
        Intervention during labor: risk factors associated with complete tear of the anal sphincter.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1992; 71: 520-524
        • Laine K.
        • Pirhonen T.
        • Rolland R.
        • Pirhonen J.
        Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1053-1057
        • de Leeuw J.W.
        • Struijk P.C.
        • Vierhout M.E.
        • Wallenburg H.C.
        Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery.
        BJOG. 2001; 108: 383-387
        • Handa V.L.
        • Danielsen B.H.
        • Gilbert W.M.
        Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98: 225-230
        • Legino L.J.
        • Woods M.P.
        • Rayburn W.F.
        • McGoogan L.S.
        Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. 50 year's experience at a university hospital.
        J Reprod Med. 1988; 33: 423-426
        • Jander C.
        • Lyrenas S.
        Third and fourth degree perineal tears. Predictor factors in a referral hospital.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80: 229-234
        • Hudelist G.
        • Gelle’n J.
        • Singer C.
        • et al.
        Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 875-881
        • Bodner-Adler B.
        • Bodner K.
        • Kaider A.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types.
        J Reprod Med. 2001; 46: 752-756
        • Andrews V.
        • Sultan A.H.
        • Thakar R.
        • Jones P.W.
        Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.
        Birth. 2006; 33: 117-122
        • Eogan M.
        • Daly L.
        • O’Connell P.R.
        • O’Herlihy C.
        Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?.
        BJOG. 2006; 113: 190-194
        • Andrews V.
        • Thakar R.
        • Sultan A.H.
        • Jones P.W.
        Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral?.
        BJOG. 2005; 112: 1156-1158
        • Tincello D.G.
        • Williams A.
        • Fowler G.E.
        • Adams E.J.
        • Richmond D.H.
        • Alfirevic Z.
        Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors.
        BJOG. 2003; 110: 1041-1044
        • McCandlish R.
        • Bowler U.
        • van Asten H.
        • et al.
        A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105: 1262-1272
        • Mayerhofer K.
        • Bodner-Adler B.
        • Bodner K.
        • et al.
        Traditional care of the perineum during birth. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of 1076 women.
        J Reprod Med. 2002; 47: 477-482
        • Albers L.L.
        • Sedler K.D.
        • Bedrick E.J.
        • Teaf D.
        • Peralta P.
        Midwifery care measures in the second stage of labor and reduction of genital tract trauma at birth: a randomized trial.
        J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005; 50: 365-372
        • Jonsson E.R.
        • Elfaghi I.
        • Rydhstrom H.
        • Herbst A.
        Modified Ritgen's maneuver for anal sphincter injury at delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 212-217
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Hayes R.J.
        Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology.
        BMJ. 1996; 312: 742-744
        • Gurusamy K.S.
        • Gluud C.
        • Nikolova D.
        • Davidson B.R.
        Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2009; 96: 342-349
        • Schulz K.F.
        Unbiased research and the human spirit: the challenges of randomized controlled trials.
        CMAJ. 1995; 153: 783-786
        • Parnell C.
        • Langhoff-Roos J.
        • Moller H.
        Conduct of labor and rupture of the sphincter ani.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80: 256-261
        • Samuelsson E.
        • Ladfors L.
        • Wennerholm U.B.
        • Gareberg B.
        • Nyberg K.
        • Hagberg H.
        Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors.
        BJOG. 2000; 107: 926-931
        • Hirsch E.
        • Haney E.I.
        • Gordon T.E.
        • Silver R.K.
        Reducing high-order perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;
        • Klein M.C.
        • Gauthier R.J.
        • Robbins J.M.
        • et al.
        Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 591-598