Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 147, ISSUE 1, P106-110, November 2009

Mechanical evaluation of synthetic biomaterials used in the correction of pelvic floor disorders—Experimental study in rabbits

  • Fabrice Sergent
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pavillon Femme-Mère-Enfant, Rouen University Hospital, Charles Nicolle, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France. Tel.: +33 2 32 88 87 45; fax: +33 2 35 98 11 49.
    Affiliations
    Clinique Gynécologique et Obstétricale, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France

    INSA-ROUEN, Polymères, Biopolymères, Surfaces, CNRS FRE 3101, 76131 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France

    Laboratoire de Chirurgie Expérimentale, Faculté de Médecine-Pharmacie Rouen, UPRES EA 3830 GRHV, 22 boulevard Gambetta, 76183 Rouen Cedex 1, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nicolas Desilles
    Affiliations
    INSA-ROUEN, Polymères, Biopolymères, Surfaces, CNRS FRE 3101, 76131 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yann Lacoume
    Affiliations
    Laboratoire de Chirurgie Expérimentale, Faculté de Médecine-Pharmacie Rouen, UPRES EA 3830 GRHV, 22 boulevard Gambetta, 76183 Rouen Cedex 1, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Claude Bunel
    Affiliations
    INSA-ROUEN, Polymères, Biopolymères, Surfaces, CNRS FRE 3101, 76131 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jean-Paul Marie
    Affiliations
    Laboratoire de Chirurgie Expérimentale, Faculté de Médecine-Pharmacie Rouen, UPRES EA 3830 GRHV, 22 boulevard Gambetta, 76183 Rouen Cedex 1, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Loïc Marpeau
    Affiliations
    Clinique Gynécologique et Obstétricale, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Objective

      To evaluate the biomechanical properties of the principal prosthetic materials currently used in genital prolapse surgery.

      Study design

      Based on an animal model of incisional abdominal hernia, 40 adult rabbits were implanted. Four 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm parietal defects, were created in the abdominal fascia and muscles while respecting the peritoneum. For each rabbit, the defect was repaired by four different large pore size prostheses which varied according to the material used: two with monofilament of heavy (75 g/m2) or low (38 g/m2) weight polypropylene (PP), and two with multifilament of heavy (115 g/m2) or low (59 g/m2) weight polyethylene-terephthalate (PET). Animals were sacrificed in groups of 10 after 14, 30, 90 and 180 days to evaluate contraction, solidity and elasticity of the prostheses.

      Results

      PP and PET retracted, independently of their weight, in 81.25% and 20% respectively. Intensity of contraction was not predictable but median value of retracted surface was 14% with PP, none with PET. Contraction settled quickly after tissue integration and did not subsequently occur. Heavyweight PET was considered the most solid material (70 N cm−1), low-weight PP the most fragile (20 N cm−1). Heavy forms of PP or PET resisted better to the rupture than the light forms which were sometimes insufficient to resist the extreme values of the human abdominal pressure (16 N cm−1). PP was more flexible than PET, but PET was the only form which was able to support extreme values of the abdominal pressure and remain in the elastic range. Duration of implantation did not modify solidity or elasticity of the prostheses.

      Conclusion

      In our abdominal rabbit model, as regards mechanical properties, heavyweight PET seems to be the optimal biomaterial.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • De Ridder D.
        Should we use meshes in the management of vaginal prolapse?.
        Curr Opin Urol. 2008; 18: 377-382
        • Amid P.K.
        Classification of biomaterials and their related complication in abdominal wall hernia surgery.
        Hernia. 1997; 1: 15-21
        • Mathe M.L.
        • Lavigne J.P.
        • Oliva-Lauraire M.C.
        • Guiraud I.
        • Mares P.
        • de Tayrac R.
        Comparison of different biomaterials for vaginal surgery using an in vivo model of meshes infection in rats.
        Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007; 35 (French): 398-405
        • Alponat A.
        • Lakshminarasappa S.R.
        • Yavuz N.
        • Goh P.M.Y.
        Prevention of adhesions by Seprefilm, an absorbable adhesion barrier: an incisional hernia model in rats.
        Am Surg. 1997; 63: 818-819
        • Claerhout F.
        • Deprest J.
        • Zheng F.
        • Konstantinovic M.
        • Lagae P.
        • De Ridder D.
        Long term evaluation of the tissue response and mechanical properties of two collagen based and polypropylene implants in a rabbit model for abdominal wall repair.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2003; 5: 516-517
        • Deprest J.
        • Zheng F.
        • Konstantinovic M.
        • et al.
        The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006; 17: 16-25
        • Gonzalez R.
        • Fugate K.
        • McClusky III, D.
        • et al.
        Relationship between tissue ingrowth and mesh contraction.
        World J Surg. 2005; 29: 1038-1043
        • Debodinance P.
        • Delporte P.
        • Engrand J.B.
        • Boulogne M.
        Development of better tolerated prosthetic materials: applications in gynecological surgery.
        J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2002; 31 (French): 527-540
        • Gauruder-Burmester A.
        • Koutouzidou P.
        • Rohne J.
        • Gronewold M.
        • Tunn R.
        Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007; 18: 1059-1064
        • Konstantinovic M.L.
        • Pille E.
        • Malinowska M.
        • Verbeken E.
        • De Ridder D.
        • Deprest J.
        Tensile strength and host response towards different polypropylene implant materials used for augmentation of fascial repair in a rat model.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007; 18: 619-626
        • Klinge U.
        • Klosterhalfen B.
        • Müller M.
        • Ottinger A.P.
        • Schumpelick V.
        Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs.
        Eur J Surg. 1998; 164: 965-969
        • Cobb W.S.
        • Burns J.M.
        • Peindl R.D.
        • et al.
        Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model.
        J Surg Res. 2006; 136: 1-7
        • Klosterhalfen B.
        • Klinge U.
        • Schumpelick V.
        Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair.
        Biomaterials. 1998; 19: 2235-2246
        • O’Dwyer P.J.
        • Kingsnorth A.N.
        • Molloy R.G.
        • Small P.K.
        • Lammers B.
        • Horeyseck G.
        Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.
        Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 166-170
        • Sand P.K.
        • Koduri S.
        • Lobel R.W.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 1357-1364