Research Article| Volume 159, ISSUE 1, P180-183, November 2011

Patients’ view of routine follow-up after gynecological cancer treatment



      The objective of this study was to assess the level of emotional distress and anxiety before one of the routine follow-up visits.

      Study design

      210 patients with gynecological malignancies completed the Psychological Assessment Screening Scale and a survey questionnaire about their views of follow-up.


      On the Psychological Assessment Screening Scale the majority of patients showed low levels of distress. The mean score on the physical condition scale was 4.7 (SD 2.7), on the sense of coherence scale 6.5 (SD 3.5), and on the emotional distress scale 7.7 (SD 3.9). The majority of patients (66%) reported low levels of anxiety and a high level of satisfaction with the follow-up regimen.


      Women undergoing routine follow-up after gynecological cancer treatment are satisfied with the current follow-up care. The psychological support patients receive due to regular clinic visits is highly valued.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


        • Zola P.
        • Fuso L.
        • Mazzola S.
        • et al.
        Could follow-up different modalities play a role in asymptomatic cervical cancer relapses diagnosis?.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107: 105-154
        • Sartori E.
        • Pasinetti B.
        • Carrara L.
        • et al.
        Pattern of failure and value of follow-up procedures in endometrial and cervical cancer patients.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107: 241-247
      1. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology – Cervical Cancer. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), 2006. (accessed V.2.2006).

        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
        Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas.
        American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Washington, DC2002 ( (accessed May 13, 2002))
        • Owen P.
        • Duncan I.D.
        Is there a value in the long term follow up of women treated for endometrial cancer?.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103: 710-713
        • Samlal R.
        • Ven der Velden J.
        • Van Erden
        • et al.
        Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy: an analysis of clinical aspects and prognosis.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1998; 8: 84
        • Kerr-Wilson R.H.
        • McCrum A.
        Follow-up of patients with gynaecological cancer.
        Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 35: 298-299
        • Barnhill D.
        • O’Connor D.
        • Farely J.
        • Teheriello M.
        • Armstrong D.
        • Park R.
        Clinical surveillance of gynecologic cancer patients.
        Gynecol Oncol. 1992; 42: 275-280
        • Glynne Jones R.
        • Chait I.
        • Thomas S.F.
        When and how to discharge cancer survivors in long tem remission from follow-up: the effectiveness of a contract.
        Clin Oncol R Coll Radio. 1997; 9: 25-29
        • Auchincloss S.S.
        After treatment. Psychosocial issues in gynecologic cancer survivorship.
        Cancer. 1995; 76: 2117-2124
        • Dennison C.R.
        The role of patient-reported outcomes in evaluating the quality of oncology care.
        Am J Managed Care. 2002; 8: S580-S586
        • Hammermeister K.E.
        • Shroyer A.L.
        • Sethi G.K.
        • Grover F.L.
        Why it is important to demonstrate linkages between outcomes of care and processes and structures of care.
        Med Care. 1995; 33: OS5-OS16
        • Isermann M.
        • Diegelmann C.
        • Kaiser W.
        • Priebe S.
        The BC-PASS (breast cancer psychological assessment screening scale).
        in: Ditz S. Diegelmann C. Isermann M. Psychoonkologie – Schwerpunkt Brustkrebs. Ein Handbuch für die ärztliche und psychotherapeutische Praxis. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart2006: 122-135
        • Leonhart R.
        Datenanalyse mit SPSS.
        Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen2010
        • Vistad I.
        • Moy B.W.
        • Salvesen H.B.
        • Liavaag A.H.
        Follow-up routines in gynaecological cancer – time for a change?.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 7 ([Epub])
        • Kew F.M.
        • Cruickshank D.J.
        Routine follow-up after treatment for a gynaecological cancer: a survey of practice.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006; 16: 380-384
        • Kew F.M.
        • Roberts A.P.
        • Cruickshank D.J.
        The role of routine follow-up after gynecological malignancy.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15: 413-419
        • Beesely V.
        • Eakin E.
        • Steginga S.
        • et al.
        Unmet needs of gynaecological cancer survivors: implications for developing community support services.
        Psycho-Oncol. 2008; 17: 392-400
        • Simonelli L.E.
        Understanding the support needs of women with gynecologic cancer.
        Del Med J. 2010; 82: 93-96
        • Fitch M.I.
        • Steele R.
        Identifying supportive care needs of women with ovarian cancer.
        Can Oncol Nurs J. 2010; 20: 66-74
        • Miller B.E.
        • Pittman B.
        • Strong C.
        Gynecologic cancer patient’ psychosocial needs and their views on the physician's role in meeting those needs.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003; 13: 111-119
        • Zabora J.
        • Brintzenhofeszoc K.
        • Curbow B.
        • et al.
        The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site.
        Psycho-Oncol. 2001; 10: 19-28