Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 159, ISSUE 2, P247-254, December 2011

Download started.

Ok

Mifepristone in combination with prostaglandins for termination of 10–16 weeks’ gestation: a systematic review

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Medical regimens using mifepristone in combination with prostaglandins have been widely available for women undergoing termination of pregnancy (TOP) at 10–16 weeks’ gestation in China. We undertook a systematic review to compare different regimens of mifepristone with prostaglandins for TOP at 10–16 weeks’ gestation.

      Methods

      We searched multiple electronic databases for English and Chinese language reports (1990–2007) including MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Included were trials comparing mifepristone with prostaglandins (misoprostol, gemeprost or carboprost (PG05)) to each other for women at 10–16 weeks’ gestation. Outcomes were successful abortion rates, induction-to-expulsion time, blood loss and side effects. Data were processed with RevMan 5 software.

      Results

      Nineteen trials comparing mifepristone with prostaglandin (misoprostol and PG05) were found of which 14 contributed to meta-analyses (4206 women). The quality of reports was poor. The effectiveness of vaginal mifepristone/misoprostol was super than mifepristone/PG05 (RR 1.14, 95%CI 1.05–1.22) as was induction-to-expulsion time, blood loss and side effects. When comparing misoprostol/mifepristone 150 mg to misoprostol/mifepristone 200 mg, no difference in TOP success rates were found (RR 0.98, 95%CI 0.96–1.01). Misoprostol vaginally compared to orally significantly increased the TOP success rate (RR 1.12, 95%CI 1.01–1.24). Gastrointestinal symptoms and fever occurred more often in misoprostol oral group (RR 1.67, 95%CI 1.46–1.91).

      Conclusions

      Medical regimens of mifepristone/prostaglandins were effective and safe for TOP at 10–16 weeks’ gestation. Misoprostol was super than PG05, and misoprostol vaginally was found to have better effectiveness than misoprostol orally. Further research should evaluate the relative effectiveness of medical methods compared to surgery.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Ashok P.W.
        • Templeton A.
        • Wagaarachchi P.T.
        • Flett G.M.
        Factors affecting the outcome of early medical abortion: a review of 4132 consecutive cases.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 109: 1281-1289
        • Kulier R.
        • Gülmezoglu A.M.
        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        • Cheng L.N.
        • Campana A.
        Medical methods for first trimester abortion.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; 2: CD002855
        • Ashok P.W.
        • Kidd A.
        • Flett G.M.
        • Fitzmaurice A.
        • Graham W.
        • Templeton A.
        A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10–13 weeks’ gestation.
        Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 92-98
        • Ashok P.W.
        • Hamoda H.
        • Flett G.M.
        • Kidd A.
        • Fitzmaurice A.
        • Templeton A.
        Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10–13 weeks’ gestation.
        Contraception. 2005; 71: 143-148
        • Hamoda H.
        • Ashok P.W.
        • Flett G.M.
        • Templeton A.
        Medical abortion at 64 to 91 days gestation: a review of 483 consecutive cases.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1315-1319
        • Cheng L.
        Termination of 10–16 weeks gestation with mifepristone plus misoprostol: a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
        Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 34: 268-271
      1. Abortion statistics for England and Wales, 2002. London: Department of Health Bulletin 2003/23; 2003.

        • Chinese Medical Association
        Guideline for diagnosis and treatment in obstetrics and gynecology.
        Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai1999
        • Wildschut H.
        • Both M.I.
        • Medema S.
        • Thomee E.
        • Wildhagen M.F.
        • Kapp N.
        Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; : CD005216
        • Say L.
        • Kulier R.
        • Gülmezoglu M.
        • Campana A.
        Medical versus surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; 1: CD003037
      2. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.

        • Hua K.
        • Lin H.
        • Liu J.
        • Xie W.
        • Zhou C.
        • Shou Q.
        • et al.
        A study of different dose of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of 12–16 weeks’ gestation.
        Chin J Fam Plan. 1996; 6: 357-359
        • Yan C.
        Clinical observation of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of 10–16 weeks’ pregnancy.
        Med Mag China. 2004; 2: 108-109
        • Fan L.
        • Fang F.
        • Ye W.
        Clinical study on termination of pregnancy between 10–16 weeks by mifepristone and misoprostol or PG05.
        Hebei Med. 2000; 6: 406-408
        • Deng W.
        Clinical observation of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of 11–16 weeks’ pregnancy.
        J Pract Med Technol. 1999; 6: 44
        • Mo D.
        • Zhang S.
        Clinical observation of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of 10–16 weeks’ pregnancy.
        Chinese Commun Doct. 2006; 8: 36
        • He H.
        • Jiang P.
        • Luo A.
        • He H.
        Clinical effect of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of 10–16 weeks pregnancy.
        Int Med Health Guid News. 2006; 12: 54-56
        • Zhu Y.
        Clinical comparison of mifepristone combined with misoprostol in different regimens for termination of 10–16 weeks’ pregnancy.
        Chinese Med Factory Mine. 2005; 18: 233-234
        • Li Q.
        Effect of two different routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy during 10–16 weeks.
        J Occup Health Damage. 2007; 22: 272-274
        • Zhang Y.
        • Li Y.
        • Li B.
        • Wang J.
        • Gu Y.
        Using misoprostol sublingually for termination of 10–14 weeks’ gestation.
        Tianjin Med J. 2007; 35: 104-105
        • Sun J.
        Clinical observation of the effect of different route of misoprostol combined with mifepristone for termination of 10–14 weeks’ pregnancy.
        Chinese J Pract Gynecol Obstet. 2004; 20: 690
        • Sun J.
        • Zhang S.
        Comparison of different route of misoprostol combined with mifepristone for termination of 10–14 weeks’ gestation.
        Med J Indus Enterprise. 2005; 18: 46-47
        • Zhang L.
        • Weng L.
        • Han X.
        Clinical observation of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of 10–16 weeks’ pregnancy.
        Chin J Fam Plan. 1997; 5: 89-91
        • Zhou S.
        Clinical observation in mifepristone combined with different prostaglandins for termination of 10–16 weeks’ pregnancy.
        Suzhou Med. 2002; 25: 204-205
        • Shen W.
        Clinical observation of the effect of different dosage of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of 10–16 weeks’ pregnancy.
        J Luzhou Med Coll. 2004; 27: 515-516
        • Wang B.
        • Chen W.
        • Cui Y.
        Clinical observation of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of 11–15 weeks’ pregnancy.
        J Pract Med. 2004; 20: 452-454
        • Li J.
        • Nan X.
        • Huang X.
        • Gong L.
        • Fan H.
        A randomized controlled study of mifepristone/testosterone propionate combined with PG05 and combined with misoprostol.
        Chin J Fam Plan. 1997; 5: 163-165
        • Wu J.
        • Dong Z.
        • Pang J.
        A semi-randomized study of comparing the therapeutic effects of mifepristone & PG05 with mifepristone& misoprostol for termination of 12–16 weeks’ pregnancy.
        Reprod Contracept. 1996; 16: 280-285
        • Wei K.
        • Zhao X.A.
        clinical trial about termination of 10–16 weeks’ gestation with mifepristone plus misoprostol.
        J Chin Med Res. 2004; 4: 212-213
        • Vickers A.
        • Goyal N.
        • Harland R.
        • Rees R.
        Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials.
        Control Clin Trials. 1998; 19: 159-166
        • Tang J.L.
        • Zhan S.Y.
        • Ernst E.
        Review of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine.
        BMJ. 1999; 319: 160-161
        • Hammond C.
        Recent advances in second-trimester abortion: an evidence-based review.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 347-356
        • Wylie B.J.
        • Mirza F.G.
        Cesarean delivery in the developing world.
        Clin Perinatol. 2008; 35: 571-582