Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 159, ISSUE 1, P87-90, November 2011

Download started.

Ok

Acute abdomen in pregnancy requiring surgical management: a 20-case series

      Abstract

      Objectives

      The obstetrician often has a difficult task in diagnosing and managing the acute abdomen in pregnancy. A reluctance to operate during pregnancy adds unnecessary delay, which may increase morbidity for both mother and fetus. In this study, we present our experience in pregnant patients with acute abdomen.

      Study design

      Pregnant patients with acute abdomen requiring surgical exploration were enrolled from 2007 to 2010. Demographics, gestational age, symptoms, fetal loss, preterm delivery, imaging studies, operative results, postoperative complications and histopathologic evaluations were recorded. Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies were evaluated. Data analyses were performed with Microsoft Excel and statistical evaluations were done by using Student's t-test.

      Results

      There were 20 patients with a mean age of 32 years. The rate of emergency surgery was seen to be significantly higher in the second trimester (p < 0.05). Most common symptoms were abdominal pain (100%) and nausea (80%). US was done in all patients while MR imaging was used in 30%. However, US findings were consistent with surgical findings in only 55%, while MR was successful in assigning the correct diagnosis in 83.3%. Appendicitis and adhesive small bowel obstruction were the most common etiologies causing acute abdomen (30% and 15%, respectively). All patients tolerated surgery well, and postoperative complications included wound infection, 10%, preterm labor, 5%, and prolonged paralytic ileus, 5%. One patient died from advanced gastric carcinoma and the only fetal death was seen in this case.

      Conclusions

      Prompt diagnosis and appropriate therapy are crucial in pregnant with acute abdomen. The use of US may be limited and CT is not desirable due to fetal irradiation. MR has thus become increasingly popular in the evaluation of such patients. Adhesive small bowel obstruction should be kept in mind as an important etiology.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Augustin G.
        • Majerovic M.
        Non-obstetrical acute abdomen during pregnancy.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007; 131: 4-12
        • Long S.S.
        • Long C.
        • Lai H.
        • Macura K.J.
        Imaging strategies for right lower quadrant pain in pregnancy.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 4-12
        • Rizzo A.G.
        Laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: long-term follow-up.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003; 13: 11-15
        • Allen J.R.
        • Helling T.S.
        • Langenfeld M.
        Intraabdominal surgery during pregnancy.
        Am J Surg. 1989; 158: 567-569
        • Kalu E.
        • Sherriff E.
        • Alsibai M.A.
        • Haidar M.
        Gestational intestinal obstruction: a case report and review of literature.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 274: 60-62
        • Zapardiel I.
        • DelaFuente-Valero J.
        • Herrero-Gamiz S.
        • Sanfrutos L.
        • Aguaron A.
        • Bajo-Arenas J.
        Large Meckel's diverticulum complicating pregnancy with an intestinal obstruction.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88: 492-493
        • Glanc P.
        • Maxwell C.
        Acute abdomen in pregnancy: role of sonography.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2010; 29: 1457-1468
        • Chen M.M.
        • Coakley F.V.
        • Kaimal A.
        • Laros Jr., R.K.
        Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 333-340
        • Beddy P.
        • Keogan M.T.
        • Sala E.
        • Griffin N.
        Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy.
        Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010; 31: 433-441
        • Oto A.
        • Ernst R.D.
        • Ghulmiyyah L.M.
        • et al.
        MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain.
        Abdom Imaging. 2009; 34: 243-250
        • Pedrosa I.
        • Lafornara M.
        • Pandharipande P.V.
        • Goldsmith J.D.
        • Rofsky N.M.
        Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate.
        Radiology. 2009; 250: 749-757
        • Casey F.E.
        • Lau K.N.
        • Mesbah M.C.
        • Khalife M.E.
        Use of laparoscopy for resolution of intussusception in the third trimester of pregnancy: a case report.
        J Reprod Med. 2009; 54: 712-714