Abstract
Objectives
Needle phobia in pregnancy poses a problem as women may refuse medical care because
of their fear. The present study investigates the impact of needle phobia on the antenatal
and intrapartum care of needle phobic women and reports on the pregnancy and neonatal
outcomes.
Study design
A retrospective cohort of 112 cases, divided into severe and mild cases of needle
phobia, was collected from the anaesthetic referral database. The data were collected
manually as well as by using the computerised hospital database, and were analysed
using SPSS version 19. Chi-square analysis and unpaired t-test were used to analyse categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The
overall departmental statistics for 2009 and 2010 were used as a comparator.
Results
Women with severe needle phobia, compared to those with mild needle phobia, registered
late with the antenatal services (17 weeks vs 14 weeks, p < 0.05), had a significant delay in obtaining their first antenatal blood tests (25 weeks vs 15 weeks, p < 0.0001), consented less often to the booking blood tests (62.8% vs 98.6%, p < 0.0001) and antenatal tests (30.2% vs 76.8%, p < 0.0001), had low use of pethidine (4.7% vs 24.6%, p < 0.01) and a higher demand for general anaesthesia (11.6% vs 0%, p < 0.01) and had an increased number of physiological deliveries of the placenta (37.2%
vs 8.7%, p < 0.0001). The incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in both groups was
low.
Conclusion
Despite the differences in choice of analgesia and acceptance of routine blood tests,
pregnancy outcomes in women with severe needle phobia were good. The study highlighted
the importance of adequate risk assessment of all women disclosing their needle phobic
status, and of provision of high-standard multidisciplinary care involving primary
and secondary healthcare professionals.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Fear of needles and vasovagal reactions among phlebotomy patients.J Anxiety Disord. 2006; 20: 946-960
- Classification of Mental & Behavioural Disorders (ICD-10).Clinical Description and Diagnostic Guidelines. WHO, Geneva1992
- Needle phobia: a neglected diagnosis.J Fam Pract. 1995; 41: 169-175
- So we started talking about a beach in Barbados”: visualization practices and needle phobia.Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71: 1804-1810
- The nature and origin of common phobic fears.Br J Psychiatry. 1979; 134: 343-351
- Sevoflurane induction for emergency caesarean section: two case reports in women with needle phobia.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2002; 11: 296-300
- Treating a man with needle phobia who requires daily injections of medication.Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1991; 42: 877-878
- Needle phobia in a patient for urgent caesarean section.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001; 10: 333-334
- Obstetric and perinatal outcomes among women with blood- and injection-phobia during pregnancy.J Affect Disord. 2011; 129: 289-295
- BJOG. 2011; 118: 1-203
- Needle phobia during pregnancy.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006; 35: 592-598
Article info
Publication history
Published online: March 19, 2012
Accepted:
February 17,
2012
Received in revised form:
January 19,
2012
Received:
October 3,
2011
Identification
Copyright
© 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
