Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 166, ISSUE 2, P215-220, February 2013

Download started.

Ok

Magnetic resonance imaging: value of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions

Published:November 12, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.029

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a high sensitivity in the detection of tumours, there is still much discussion about its role in breast cancer detection. MRI is not yet routinely used to further characterize lesions in patients diagnosed with breast cancer. This study investigated the impact of preoperative MRI on the surgical treatment of women with biopsy proven breast cancer. The diagnostic value of preoperative MRI was compared with that of conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasonography), and the diffusion-weighted imaging technique was also evaluated.

      Study design

      40 women underwent conventional imaging and biopsy as part of the clinical workup. In addition, preoperative MRI was performed in each patient. The kinetics of contrast captation were monitored and apparent diffusion coefficients were calculated. All imaging findings were compared with the histopathologic results, which were used as the gold standard. Differences in tumour extent, as determined by ultrasonography, MRI and histopathology, were evaluated.

      Results

      Contrast captation kinetics curves are mostly aspecific, while apparent diffusion coefficient values seem to correlate much better with tumour malignancy. MRI correlated more accurately with histopathological findings than ultrasonography and even revealed unsuspected multifocal and multicentric breast carcinoma in 20 patients (50%). The surgical plan of seven patients (18%) was changed as a result of the additional information provided by MRI.

      Conclusion

      Diffusion-weighted imaging as a complementary tool to contrast captation kinetics and morphologic measurements may increase the specificity of MRI and help in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. In addition, MRI yields more precise information than mammography and ultrasonography about the exact location, the extent, the multifocality or multicentricity of the tumour and can also detect possible additional tumours. Although MRI will never replace mammography (screening) or ultrasonography as a test for breast cancer in women with no high risk (e.g. BRCA 1 or 2 carriers), its use in a preoperative setting may allow more accurate staging of the disease, which in turn could result in a change in the treatment planning.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Orel S.G.
        • Schnall M.D.
        MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.
        Radiology. 2001; 220: 13-30
        • Kuhl C.
        The current status of breast MR imaging part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.
        Radiology. 2007; 244: 356-378
        • Van Goethem M.
        • Verslegers I.
        • Biltjes I.
        • Parizel P.M.
        MR is/is not a useful diagnostic tool for breast cancer management.
        Acta Chirurgica Belgica. 2007; 107: 267-270
        • Wenkel E.
        • Geppert C.
        • Uder M.
        • Kiefer B.
        • Bautz W.
        • Janka R.
        Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast MRI – an easy way to improve specificity.
        Magnetom Flash. 2007; 3: 28-32
        • Jiang Z.X.
        • Peng W.J.
        • Li W.T.
        • et al.
        Effect of b value on monitoring therapeutic response by diffusion-weighted imaging.
        World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008; 14: 5893-5899
        • DeMartini W.
        • Lehman C.
        A review of current evidence-based clinical applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging.
        Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2008; 19: 143-150
        • Blackwell R.E.
        • Grotting J.C.
        Diagnosis and management of breast disease.
        Blackwell Science, Grotting1996
        • Park M.J.
        • Cha E.S.
        • Kang B.J.
        • Ihn Y.K.
        • Baik J.H.
        The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.
        Korean Journal of Radiology. 2007; 8: 390-396
        • Partridge S.C.
        Future applications and innovations of clinical breast magnetic resonance imaging.
        Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2008; 19: 171-176
        • Hlawatsch A.
        • Teifke A.
        • Schmidt M.
        • Thelen M.
        Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
        AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002; 179: 1493-1501
        • Esserman L.
        • Wolverton D.
        • Hylton N.
        Magnetic resonance imaging for primary breast cancer management: current role and new applications.
        Endocrine-Related Cancer. 2002; 9: 141-153
        • Mallon E.
        • Osin P.
        • Nasiri N.
        • Blain I.
        • Howard B.
        • Gusterson B.
        The basic pathology of human breast cancer.
        Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 2000; 5: 139-163
        • Kuhl C.
        • Kuhn W.
        • Braun M.
        • Schild H.
        Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back?.
        Breast. 2007; 16: 34-44