Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 171, ISSUE 2, P252-256, December 2013

Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) evaluation of theoretical versus hands-on training of vaginal breech delivery management: a randomized trial

Published:September 30, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.015

      Abstract

      Objective

      To compare the skills of performing a vaginal breech (VB) delivery after hands-on training versus demonstration.

      Study design

      We randomized medical students to a 30-min demonstration (group 1) or a 30-min hands-on (group 2) training session using a standardized VB management algorithm on a pelvic training model. Subjects were tested with a 25 item Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scoring system immediately after training and 72 h thereafter. OSATS scores were the primary outcome. Performance time (PT), self assessment (SA), confidence (CON), and global rating scale (GRS) were the secondary outcomes. Statistics were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test, chi-square test, and multiple linear regression analysis.

      Results

      172 subjects were randomized. OSATS scores (primary outcome) were significantly higher in group 2 (n = 88) compared to group 1 (n = 84) (21.18 ± 2.29 vs. 20.19 ± 2.37, respectively; p = 0.006). The secondary outcomes GRS (10.31 ± 2.28 vs. 9.17 ± 2.21; p = 0.001), PT (214.60 ± 57.97 s vs. 246.98 ± 59.34 s; p < 0.0001), and CON (3.14 ± 0.89 vs. 2.85 ± 0.90; p = 0.04) were also significantly different between groups, favoring group 2. After 72 h, primary and secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups. In a multiple linear regression analysis, group assignment (odds ratio [OR] 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–2.05; p < 0.0001) and gender (OR 2.91; 95% CI 2.45–3.38; p < 0.0001) independently influenced OSATS scores.

      Conclusion

      Hands-on training leads to a significant improvement of VB management in a pelvic training model, but this effect was only seen in the short term.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Hehir M.P.
        • O’Connor H.D.
        • Kent E.M.
        • et al.
        Changes in vaginal breech delivery rates in a single large metropolitan area.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: e1-e4
        • Bassaw B.
        • Rampersad N.
        • Roopnarinesingh S.
        • Sirjusingh A.
        Correlation of fetal outcome with mode of delivery for breech presentation.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 24: 254-258
        • Su M.
        • McLeod L.
        • Ross S.
        • et al.
        Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group Factors associated with maternal morbidity in the Term Breech Trial.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007; 29: 324-330
        • Diro M.
        • Puangsricharern A.
        • Royer L.
        • O'Sullivan M.J.
        • Burkett G.
        Singleton term breech deliveries in nulliparous and multiparous women: a 5-year experience at the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 247-252
        • Gilbert W.M.
        • Hicks S.M.
        • Boe N.M.
        • Danielsen B.
        Vaginal versus cesarean delivery for breech presentation in California: a population-based study.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 911-917
        • Committee on Obstetric Practice A.C.O.G.
        ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 235-237
        • Crofts J.F.
        • Bartlett C.
        • Ellis D.
        • Hunt L.P.
        • Fox R.
        • Draycott T.J.
        Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1477-1485
        • Goff B.A.
        • VanBlaricom A.
        • Mandel L.
        • Chinn M.
        • Nielsen P.
        Comparison of objective, structured assessment of technical skills with a virtual reality hysteroscopy trainer and standard latex hysteroscopy model.
        J Reprod Med. 2007; 52: 407-412
        • Lentz G.M.
        • Mandel L.S.
        • Lee D.
        • Gardella C.
        • Melville J.
        • Goff B.A.
        Testing surgical skills of obstetric and gynecologic residents in a bench laboratory setting: validity and reliability.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 1462-1468
        • Egi H.
        • Tokunaga M.
        • Hattori M.
        • Ohdan H.
        Evaluating the correlation between the HUESAD and OSATS scores: Concurrent validity study.
        Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 2013; 22: 144-149
        • Steehler M.K.
        • Chu E.E.
        • Na H.
        • Pfisterer M.J.
        • Hesham H.N.
        • Malekzadeh S.
        Teaching and assessing endoscopic sinus surgery skills on a validated low-cost task trainer.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 841-844
        • Hefler L.
        • Grimm C.
        • Kueronya V.
        • Tempfer C.
        • Reinthaller A.
        • Polterauer S.
        A novel training model for the loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: e1-e4
        • Buerkle B.
        • Pueth J.
        • Hefler L.A.
        • Tempfer-Bentz E.K.
        • Tempfer C.B.
        Objective structured assessment of technical skills evaluation of theoretical compared with hands-on training of shoulder dystocia management: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 809-814
        • Deering S.
        • Poggi S.
        • Macedonia C.
        • Gherman R.
        • Satin A.J.
        Improving resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia with simulation training.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 1224-1228
        • Lavin Jr., J.P.
        • Eaton J.
        • Hopkins M.
        Teaching vaginal breech delivery and external cephalic version. A survey of faculty attitudes.
        J Reprod Med. 2000; 45: 808-812
        • Dhingra S.
        • Raffi F.
        Obstetric trainees’ experience in VBD and ECV in the UK.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30: 10-12
        • Larsen C.R.
        • Soerensen J.L.
        • Grantcharov T.P.
        • et al.
        Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomized controlled trial.
        Brit Med J. 2009; 338: b1802
        • Draycott T.J.
        • Crofts J.F.
        • Ash J.P.
        • et al.
        Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 14-20