Research Article| Volume 171, ISSUE 2, P348-352, December 2013

Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer

Published:October 07, 2013DOI:



      The aim of our medico-economic study was to compare robotic surgery cost with conventional laparoscopic cost in endometrial and cervical cancer.

      Study design

      Our study included laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures (radical hysterectomies and lymphadenectomies) for endometrial or cervical cancer ever since first using the Da Vinci® in 2008 within a hospital setting. In the hospital perspective, direct costs were determined by examining the overall medical pathway for each type of intervention. Actual costs were calculated for 27 conventional laparoscopic procedures and for 30 robot-assisted procedures including initial cost of the robot and its maintenance. We estimated the complete medical “overall care” costs by adding the costs of consultations, surgery and post-operative hospital stay to the costs of any eventual emergency consultation and/or hospitalisation within the two months that followed surgery. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of variable modulations.


      For endometrial cancer, surgical procedure cost for robotic-assisted surgery was €7402 compared to €2733 for conventional laparoscopic surgery. When considering overall medical care, the patient treatment average cost was €6666 for the laparoscopic group (with an average length of stay of 5.27 days) as compared to €10,816 for robotic group (with an average hospital stay of 4.60 days), p = 0.39. For cervical cancer, average surgical cost with robotic-assisted surgery was €8501 compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery at €3239. For cervical cancer, overall care average cost was €7803 for the laparoscopic group (with an average length of stay of 5.83 days) as compared to €12,211 for the robotic group (with an average hospital stay of 4.70 days) p = 0.07. Sensitivity analysis results confirmed the cost overrun with the use of robotic assisted surgery.


      Conventional laparoscopy was less expensive in our institution than robotic-assisted surgery for the surgery of endometrial (1:2.7) and cervical (1:2.6) cancers. When considering overall medical care, the use of robotic-assisted surgery was found to be 1.6 times more expensive than conventional surgery.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      1. Comprehensive cervical cancer prevention and control: a healthier future for girls and women:

        • Parkin D.M.
        • Bray F.
        • Ferlay J.
        • Pisani P.
        Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.
        Int J Cancer. 2001; 94: 153-156
        • Eltabbakh G.H.
        • Shamonki M.I.
        • Moody J.M.
        • Garafano L.L.
        Laparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma.
        Cancer. 2001; 91: 378-387
        • Querleu D.
        • Papageorgiou T.
        • Lambaudie E.
        • Sonoda Y.
        • Narducci F.
        • LeBlanc E.
        Laparoscopic restaging of borderline ovarian tumors: results of 30 cases initially presumed as stage IA borderline ovarian tumour.
        BJOG. 2003; 110: 201-204
        • Ghezzi F.
        • Cromi A.
        • Ciravolo G.
        Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 106: 502-506
        • Sarlos D.
        • Kots L.
        • Stevanovic N.
        • Schaer G.
        Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 150: 92-96
        • Dennis T.
        • Mendonça C.
        • Narducci F.
        • et al.
        Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy.
        Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012; 40: 77-83
        • Bell M.C.
        • Torgerson J.
        • Seshadri-Kreaden U.
        • Suttle A.W.
        • Hunt S.
        Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111: 407-411
        • Barnett J.C.
        • Judd J.P.
        • Wu J.M.
        • Scales C.D.
        • Myers E.R.
        • Havrilesky L.J.
        Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 685-693
        • Martino M.A.
        • Shubella J.
        • Thomas M.B.
        • et al.
        A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 123: 528-531
        • Barbash G.
        • Glied S.A.
        New technology and health care costs – the case of robot-assisted surgery.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 701-704
        • Lim P.C.
        • Kang E.
        • Park D.H.
        A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 120: 413-418
        • Shah N.T.
        • Wright K.N.
        • Jonsdottir G.M.
        • Jorgensen S.
        • Einarsson J.I.
        • Muto M.G.
        The feasibility of societal cost equivalence between robotic hysterectomy and alternate hysterectomy methods for endometrial cancer.
        Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011; 2011: 570464