Advertisement

European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG)

      The provision of safe abortion is crucial to the public health of all communities. WHO advises that the choice of abortion should be readily available to women in all national healthcare systems [
      • WHO
      Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception.
      ]. For more than 25 years medical abortion with combined mifepristone and misoprostol has proved to be safe, effective and acceptable. Non-surgical methods of abortion have been developed for both first and second trimester abortion. Medical abortion not only increases access but there is evidence that abortions are done at lower gestations, which is both safer and more acceptable to women. (The risks of terminating a pregnancy increase with gestation.) Furthermore medical abortion in the early first trimester offers the possibility of having the abortion at home or in a primary healthcare clinic, while medical abortion at later gestations provides an alternative to highly skilled surgery which is not always available.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • WHO
        Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2015
        • WHO
        Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems.
        2nd edition. World Health Organization, Geneva2012 ([accessed 11.11.15])
        • Stephenson P.
        • Wagner M.
        • Badea M.
        • Serbanescu F.
        Commentary: the public health consequences of restricted induced abortion – lessons from Romania.
        Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 1328-1331
        • Sedgh G.
        • Singh S.
        • Shah I.H.
        • Åhman E.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        • Bankole A.
        Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008.
        Lancet. 2012; 379: 625-632
        • Oppegaard K.S.
        • Qvigstad E.
        • Fiala C.
        • Heikinheimo O.
        • Benson L.
        • Gemzell-Danielsson K.
        Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 698-704