Advertisement
Review| Volume 205, P15-20, October 2016

Lack of information received by a French female cohort regarding prevention against exposure to reprotoxic agents during pregnancy

  • Marie-Charlotte Chabert
    Affiliations
    Département de médecine générale, Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 27 Bd Jean Moulin 13385 Marseille, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jeanne Perrin
    Affiliations
    Pôle Femmes-Mères-Enfants, AP-HM La Conception, Marseille, France

    Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397, Marseille, France

    CECOS-Laboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction, Pôle Femmes-Mères-Enfants, AP-HM La Conception, 147 Bd Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Julie Berbis
    Affiliations
    EA 3279, Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life, Research Unit, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille 13284, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Florence Bretelle
    Affiliations
    Pôle Femmes-Mères-Enfants, AP-HM Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France

    Aix Marseille Université, Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales et Emergentes, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, INSERM 1095, Marseille, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sébastien Adnot
    Affiliations
    Département de médecine générale, Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 27 Bd Jean Moulin 13385 Marseille, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Blandine Courbiere, MD, PhD, Pôle Femmes-Mères-Enfants, AP-HM La Conception, 147 Bd Baille, 13005 Marseille, France. Fax: +33 04 91 38 39 71.
    Blandine Courbiere
    Correspondence
    Corresponding auhtor.
    Footnotes
    1 Blandine Courbiere, MD, PhD, Pôle Femmes-Mères-Enfants, AP-HM La Conception, 147 Bd Baille, 13005 Marseille, France. Fax: +33 04 91 38 39 71.
    Affiliations
    Pôle Femmes-Mères-Enfants, AP-HM La Conception, Marseille, France

    Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397, Marseille, France
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Blandine Courbiere, MD, PhD, Pôle Femmes-Mères-Enfants, AP-HM La Conception, 147 Bd Baille, 13005 Marseille, France. Fax: +33 04 91 38 39 71.

      Abstract

      Objective

      The aim of this study was to evaluate the information pregnant women received regarding possible exposures to five recognized reprotoxic agents during their pregnancy.

      Study design

      A cohort study was conducted using two postnatal units in France. Women hospitalized in postnatal units were requested to complete a self-administered two part questionnaire. The first part gathered information about the patient’s socio-professional level and the type of pregnancy follow-up. The second part examined the information the patient received regarding daily products containing the following known reprotoxic agents: bisphenol A, toluene, n-hexane, cis-chloroallyl-triaza-azonia-adamantane-chloride and O-phenyl-phenol. The women cited the sources of information. We combined the employment status and educational level to separate the women into two groups. The groups were then compared using the Chi Square test or Fisher’s exact test.

      Result(s)

      There were 390 women in this study. Our results showed the women received information regarding the following: 21.6% (n = 84) regarding tin cans, 21.9% (n = 85) concerning plastic meal boxes when heated in microwave ovens, 8.8% (n = 32) about water in gas-bottles, 27.4% (n = 106) about non-organic foods, 39.3% (n = 152) about hair dyes, 17% (n = 66) about nail polishes, 23.4% (n = 103) about insect repellents, 34.4% (n = 133) about “do-it-yourself” products, 2.1% (n = 8) about gardening products, 26.7% (n = 103) about electric plug-in repellents, 21.1% (n = 81) about housekeeping products, and 6.8% (n = 26) about register receipts. Women with a higher level of education and a qualified occupation were better informed about these daily products. These women were more likely to learn the information on their own (internet, media).

      Conclusion(s)

      Our study showed French women did not receive sufficient information regarding potential exposures to reprotoxic agents during pregnancy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Zoeller R.T.
        • Brown T.R.
        • Doan L.L.
        • et al.
        Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society.
        Endocrinology. 2012 Sep; 153: 4097-4110
        • Caserta D.
        • Maranghi L.
        • Mantovani A.
        • Marci R.
        • Maranghi F.
        • Moscarini M.
        Impact of endocrine disruptor chemicals in gynaecology.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Dec 10; 14: 59-72
        • Benachour N.
        • Moslemi S.
        • Sipahutar H.
        • Seralini G.
        Cytotoxic effects and aromatase inhibition by xenobiotic endocrine disrupters alone and in combination.
        Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007 Jul 15; 222: 129-140
        • Diamanti-Kandarakis E.
        • Bourguignon J.-P.
        • Giudice L.C.
        • et al.
        Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an endocrine society scientific statement.
        Endocr Rev. 2009; 30: 293-342
        • Vandenberg L.N.
        • Maffini M.V.
        • Sonnenschein C.
        • Rubin B.S.
        • Soto A.M.
        Bisphenol-A and the Great Divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption.
        Endocr Rev. 2009; 30: 75-95
        • Rubin B.S.
        • Murray M.K.
        • Damassa D.A.
        • King J.C.
        • Soto A.M.
        Perinatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A affects body weight, patterns of estrous cyclicity and plasma LH levels.
        Environ Health Perspect. 2001; 109: 675-680
        • Xu X.
        • Zhang J.
        • Wang Y.
        • Ye Y.
        • Luo Q.
        Perinatal exposure to bisphenol-A impairs learning-memory by concomitant down-regulation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors of hippocampus in male offspring mice.
        Horm Behav. 2010; 58: 326-333
        • Acevedo N.
        • Davis B.
        • Schaeberle C.M.
        • Sonnenschein C.
        • Soto A.M.
        Perinatally administered bisphenol A acts as a mammary gland carcinogen in rats.
        Environ Health Perspect. 2013; 121: 1040-1046
        • Moral R.
        • Wang R.
        • Hopenhayn-Rich C.
        • Russo I.H.
        • Russo J.
        Effect of prenatal exposure to the endocrine disruptor bisphenol A on mammary gland morphology and gene expression signature.
        J Endocrinol. 2008; 196: 101-112
        • Ng T.P.
        • Foo S.C.
        • Yoong T.
        Risk of spontaneous abortion in workers exposed to toluene.
        Br J Ind Med. 1992; 49: 804-808
        • Roberts L.G.
        • Bevans A.C.
        • Schreiner C.A.
        Developmental and reproductive toxicity evaluation of toluene vapor in the rat: I. Reproductive toxicity.
        Reprod Toxicol Elmsford N. 2003; 17: 649-658
        • Donald J.M.
        • Kim Hooper
        • Hopenhayn-Rich C.
        Reproductive and developmental toxicity of toluene: a review.
        Environ Health Perspect. 1991; 94: 237-244
        • Nylén P.
        • Ebendal T.
        • Eriksdotter-Nilsson M.
        • et al.
        Testicular atrophy and loss of nerve growth factor-immunoreactive germ cell line in rats exposed to n-hexane and a protective effect of simultaneous exposure to toluene or xylene.
        Arch Toxicol. 1989; 63: 296-307
        • Li H.
        • Liu J.
        • Sun Y.
        • et al.
        n-Hexane inhalation during pregnancy alters DNA promoter methylation in the ovarian granulosa cells of rat offspring: n-hexane-induced promoter methylation in rats.
        J Appl Toxicol. 2014; 34: 841-856
        • Garlantezec R.
        • Monfort C.
        • Rouget F.
        • Cordier S.
        Maternal occupational exposure to solvents and congenital malformations: a prospective study in the general population.
        Occup Environ Med. 2009; 66: 456-463
        • Whyatt Robin M.
        Residential pesticide use during pregnancy among a cohort of urban minority women.
        Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110: 507-514
        • Warren K.R.
        A review of the history of attitudes toward drinking in pregnancy.
        Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015; 39: 1110-1117
        • Stephenson J.
        • Patel D.
        • Barrett G.
        • et al.
        How do women prepare for pregnancy? Preconception experiences of women attending antenatal services and views of health professionals.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9 (Rosenfeld C.S., editor): e103085
        • Di Renzo G.C.
        • Conry J.A.
        • Blake J.
        • et al.
        International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics opinion on reproductive health impacts of exposure to toxic environmental chemicals.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 131: 219-225
        • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Exposure to toxic environmental agents.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 931-934
        • Woodruff T.J.
        • Zota A.R.
        • Schwartz J.M.
        Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004.
        Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119: 878-885
        • Stotland N.E.
        • Sutton P.
        • Trowbridge J.
        • et al.
        Counseling patients on preventing prenatal environmental exposures—a mixed-methods study of obstetricians.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9 (Chen A., editor): e98771
        • Tinney V.A.
        • Paulson J.A.
        • Bathgate S.L.
        • Larsen J.W.
        Medical education for obstetricians and gynecologists should incorporate environmental health.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212 (e1): 163-166
        • Forsetlund L.
        • Bjørndal A.
        • Rashidian A.
        • et al.
        Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
        in: The Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane database of systematic reviews [internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK2009https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2 ([cited 2016 Jun 23])
        • Giguère A.
        • Légaré F.
        • Grimshaw J.
        • et al.
        Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.
        in: The Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane database of systematic reviews [internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK2012https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub3 ([cited 2016 Jun 23])
        • Sutton P.
        • Woodruff T.J.
        • Perron J.
        • et al.
        Toxic environmental chemicals: the role of reproductive health professionals in preventing harmful exposures.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207: 164-173