Position for labor and birth: State of knowledge and biomechanical perspectives

Published:November 15, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.11.006

      Abstract

      This review aims to examine how childbirth position during labour affects maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. Epidemiological data suggest that vertical birthing positions have many benefits. But when we consider the players and mechanisms of delivery, including the forces generated to move the fetus and obstacles to its progression, many questions remain about the advantage of one position over another.
      Thus, childbirth could be considered in a way as an athletic feat that probably requires the choice of optimal positions. These should be individually suited to each woman at different stage of labour to improve its efficiency and effectiveness.
      Tweetable abstract: Beyond epidemiological data, biomechanical investigations is necessary to assess birth’s position.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Ducloy-Bouthors A.-S.
        • De Gasquet B.
        • Davette M.
        • Cuisse M.
        Postures maternelles pendant le travail: description et interférence avec l’analgésie péridurale.
        Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2006; 25: 605-608
        • Dunn P.M.
        Francois Mauriceau (1637–1709) and maternal posture for parturition.
        Arch Dis Child. 1991; 66: 78-79
        • Androutsos G.
        La lithiase urinaire et son traitement par Ambroise Paré (1509–1590)].
        Prog Urol. 2004; 14: 109-117
        • Naroll F.
        • Naroll R.
        • Howard F.H.
        Position of women in childbirth. A study in data quality control.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961; 82: 943-954
        • Engelmann G.J.
        Labor among primitive peoples.
        JH Chambers & Company, 1884
        • Jarcho J.
        Postures & practices during labor among primitive peoples: adaptations to modern obstetrics.
        PB Hoeber, 1934
        • Atwood R.J.
        Parturitional posture and related birth behavior.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1976; 55: 3-25
        • Gupta J.K.
        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        Position for women during second stage of labour.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; 1: CD002006
        • Gupta J.K.
        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        • Shehmar M.
        Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 5: CD002006
        • Gupta J.K.
        • Nikodem V.C.
        Woman’s position during second stage of labour.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; 2: CD002006
        • Lawrence A.
        • Lewis L.
        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        • Styles C.
        Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 10: CD003934
        • Gottvall K.
        • Allebeck P.
        • Ekeus C.
        Risk factors for anal sphincter tears: the importance of maternal position at birth.
        BJOG. 2007; 114: 1266-1272
        • Lien Y.-S.
        • Chen G.-D.
        • Ng S.-C.
        Prevalence of and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms among women in rural Nepal.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012; 119: 185-188
        • da Silva F.M.B.
        • de Oliveira S.M.J.V.
        • Bick D.
        • Osava R.H.
        • Tuesta E.F.
        • Riesco M.L.G.
        Risk factors for birth-related perineal trauma: a cross-sectional study in a birth centre.
        J Clin Nurs. 2012; 15–16: 2209-2218
        • Spiby H.
        • Slade P.
        • Escott D.
        • Henderson B.
        • Fraser R.B.
        Selected coping strategies in labor: an investigation of women’s experiences.
        Birth. 2003; 30: 189-194
        • Müller M.
        Risk and error management: can medicine benefit from lessons learned in aviation.
        Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015; 58: 95-99
        • Cyna A.M.
        • Andrew M.
        • Emmett R.S.
        • Middleton P.
        • Simmons S.W.
        Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 4: CD002251
        • Golara M.
        • Plaat F.
        • Shennan A.H.
        Upright versus recumbent position in the second stage of labour in women with combined spinal-epidural analgesia.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2002; 11: 19-22
        • de Jong P.R.
        • Johanson R.B.
        • Baxen P.
        • Adrians V.D.
        • van der Westhuisen S.
        • Jones P.W.
        Randomised trial comparing the upright and supine positions for the second stage of labour.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 567-571
        • Kemp E.
        • Kingswood C.J.
        • Kibuka M.
        • Thornton J.G.
        Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 1: CD008070
        • Samuelsson E.
        • Ladfors L.
        • Wennerholm U.B.
        • Gåreberg B.
        • Nyberg K.
        • Hagberg H.
        Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors.
        BJOG. 2000; 107: 926-931
        • Laine K.
        • Pirhonen T.
        • Rolland R.
        • Pirhonen J.
        Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1053-1057
        • Blondel B.
        • Lelong N.
        • Kermarrec M.
        • Goffinet F.
        • National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys
        Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys.
        J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012; 41: 1-15
        • Wong C.A.
        Advances in labor analgesia.
        Int J Womens Health. 2010; 1: 139-154
        • Bates R.G.
        • Helm C.W.
        • Duncan A.
        • Edmonds D.K.
        Uterine activity in the second stage of labour and the effect of epidural analgesia.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985; 92: 1246-1250
        • Bicknell R.J.
        • Leng G.
        • Russell J.A.
        • Dyer R.G.
        • Mansfield S.
        • Zhao B.G.
        Hypothalamic opioid mechanisms controlling oxytocin neurones during parturition.
        Brain Res Bull. 1988; 20: 743-749
        • Gardosi J.
        • Sylvester S.
        • B-Lynch C.
        Alternative positions in the second stage of labour: a randomized controlled trial.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989; 96: 1290-1296
        • Wong C.A.
        Nerve injuries after neuraxial anaesthesia and their medicolegal implications.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 24: 367-381
      1. F. Cunningham, K. Leveno, J. Hauth, Williams obstetrics, 24 ed., 2014.

        • Cheng Y.W.
        • Hubbard A.
        • Caughey A.B.
        • Tager I.B.
        The association between persistent fetal occiput posterior position and perinatal outcomes: an example of propensity score and covariate distance matching.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 171: 656-663
        • Cheng Y.W.
        • Shaffer B.L.
        • Caughey A.B.
        Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: a retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006; 19: 563-568
        • Hunter S.
        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        • Kulier R.
        Hands and knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior).
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 4: CD001063
        • Desbriere R.
        • Blanc J.
        • Le DÛ R.
        • Renner J.-P.
        • Carcopino X.
        • Loundou A.
        • et al.
        Is maternal posturing during labor efficient in preventing persistent occiput posterior position? A randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208: e1-e8
        • Malvasi A.
        • Giacci F.
        • Gustapane S.
        • Sparic R.
        • Barbera A.
        • Tinelli A.
        Intrapartum sonographic signs: new diagnostic tools in malposition and malrotation.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29: 2408-2413
        • Ramphul M.
        • Ooi P.V.
        • Burke G.
        • Kennelly M.M.
        • Said S a. T
        • Montgomery A.A.
        • et al.
        Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.
        BJOG. 2014; 121: 1029-1038
        • Farabeuf L.H.
        • Varnier H.
        • Pinard A.
        Principes Fondamentaux D’Obstétrique, Vérifiés, Rectifiés Ou Établis À L’Aide De L’éxpérimentation Sur Le Mannequin Naturel Et De L’Observation Sur La Parturiente. Introduction À L’étude Clinique Et À. La Pratique Des Accouchements.
        Paris: G. Steinheil, 1904
        • Russell J.G.
        Moulding of the pelvic outlet.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969; 76: 817-820
        • Michel S.C.A.
        • Rake A.
        • Treiber K.
        • Seifert B.
        • Chaoui R.
        • Huch R.
        • et al.
        MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic bony dimensions.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179: 1063-1067
        • Gherman R.B.
        • Tramont J.
        • Muffley P.
        • Goodwin T.M.
        Analysis of McRoberts’ maneuver by x-ray pelvimetry.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95: 43-47
        • Calguneri M.
        • Bird H.A.
        • Wright V.
        Changes in joint laxity occurring during pregnancy.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1982; 41: 126-128
        • Dumas G.A.
        • Reid J.G.
        Laxity of knee cruciate ligaments during pregnancy.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997; 26: 2-6
      2. Aetius Amidenus. In: lib XVI,25.

        • Rosa P.A.
        Pelvimetry, pelvigraphy and rational obstetrical mechanics.
        Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr. 1951; 3: 398-408
        • Hainaut J.
        • Rosa P.
        Example of rational mechanics applied to obstetrics.
        Bulletin De La Fédération Des Sociétés De Gynécologie Et D’obstétrique De Langue Française. 1952; 4: 659-663
        • Rosa P.
        A new example of rational mechanics: spondylolisthesis and childbirth by the natural route.
        Bull Soc R Belge Gynecol Obstet. 1960; 31: 581-584
        • Lazennec J.-Y.
        • Rousseau M.A.
        • Catonne Y.
        Biomécanique du complexe lombo-pelvi-fémoral Conséquences fonctionnelles des relations hanche-rachis.
        Réflexions autour du bassin. Springer, Paris2011: 1-16
        • Barber E.L.
        • Lundsberg L.S.
        • Belanger K.
        • Pettker C.M.
        • Funai E.F.
        • Illuzzi J.L.
        Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 29-38
        • Glass B.L.
        • Munger R.E.
        • Johnson W.L.
        Instrument to measure tissue softness of the uterine cervix in pregnancy.
        Med Res Eng. 1968; 7: 34-35
        • Moore D.F.
        • Geyer W.
        A review of hysteresis theories for elastomers.
        Wear. 1974; 30: 1-34
        • Ashton-Miller J.A.
        • Delancey J.O.L.
        On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae.
        Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009; 11: 163-176
        • Aran T.
        • Osmanagaoglu M.A.
        • Kart C.
        • Guven S.
        • Sahin M.
        • Unsal M.A.
        Failed labor induction in nulliparous women at term: the role of pelvic floor muscle strength.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23: 1105-1110
        • Bø K.
        • Fleten C.
        • Nystad W.
        Effect of antenatal pelvic floor muscle training on labor and birth.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 1279-1284
        • Agur W.
        • Steggles P.
        • Waterfield M.
        • Freeman R.
        Does antenatal pelvic floor muscle training affect the outcome of labour? A randomised controlled trial.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19: 85-88
        • Salvesen K.A.
        • Mørkved S.
        Randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy.
        BMJ. 2004; 329: 378-380
        • Parente M.P.
        • Natal Jorge R.M.
        • Mascarenhas T.
        • Silva-Filho A.L.
        The influence of pelvic muscle activation during vaginal delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 804-808
        • Chen S.Z.
        • Aisaka K.
        • Mori H.
        • Kigawa T.
        Effects of sitting position on uterine activity during labor.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 69: 67-73
        • Steer P.J.
        Standards in fetal monitoring–practical requirements for uterine activity measurement and recording.
        BJOG. 1993; 100: 32-36
        • Gizzo S.
        • Di Gangi S.
        • Noventa M.
        • Bacile V.
        • Zambon A.
        • Nardelli G.B.
        Women’s choice of positions during labour: return to the past or a modern way to give birth? A cohort study in Italy.
        Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 638093
      3. Desseauve D, Lacouture P, Pierre F. “Birth is like a marathon” revisiting childbirth by using sports biomechanics approaches. [Internet]. 33rd International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports; 2015; Poitiers. Disponible sur: http://isbs2015.sciencesconf.org/60518.