Advertisement
Full length article| Volume 210, P102-107, March 2017

Download started.

Ok

Diagnostic accuracy of Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) for endometriosis in symptomatic women: A multi-center study

  • Martin Hirsch
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Women’s Health Research Unit, Bart’s and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AB, United Kingdom.
    Affiliations
    Women’s Health Research Unit, The Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AB, United Kingdom

    Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • James M.N. Duffy
    Affiliations
    Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2JD, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • Christine S. Deguara
    Affiliations
    Centre for Reproductive Medicine, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • Colin J. Davis
    Affiliations
    Women’s Health Research Unit, The Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AB, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • Khalid S. Khan
    Affiliations
    Women’s Health Research Unit, The Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AB, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 05, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.002

      Abstract

      Study objective

      To assess the diagnostic accuracy of serum Cancer Antigen 125 (CA 125) ≥ 30 units/milliliter (u/ml) for diagnosing endometriosis in symptomatic women.

      Study design

      Prospective observational cohort study including patients with symptoms of pelvic pain or subfertility undergoing elective diagnostic laparoscopy at two tertiary referral hospitals. We excluded patients suspected to have other gynecological pathology. We evaluated the accuracy of serum CA 125 (index test) with histologically confirmed endometriosis (reference standard).

      Main results

      Fifty-eight consecutive women recruited between October 2013 to March 2015. Women with endometriosis had a higher CA 125 level than those without endometriosis (mean 54.7 +/−71.6 vs 16.2 +/− 8.0). The specificity of CA 125 ≥ 30 u/ml was 96% (95% CI 81.7–99.9%) and sensitivity was 57% (95% CI 37.4–74.5%). The positive likelihood ratio for the histological presence of endometriosis with a CA 125 ≥ 30 u/ml was 15.8 (95% CI 2.3-112) providing a post-test probability of 94% (95% CI 71%–99%) in women with pelvic pain or subfertility. The area under the curve, 0.85 (95% CI 0.74–0.96) indicates high test accuracy.

      Conclusions

      CA 125 ≥ 30 u/ml is highly predictive of endometriosis in women with symptoms of pain and/or subfertility. CA 125 should be considered as a rule-in test for expediting the diagnosis and management of endometriosis, CA 125 <30 u/ml is, however, unable to rule out endometriosis.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Hirsch M.
        • Duffy M.N.J.
        • Davis C.J.
        • Plana M.N.
        • Khan K.
        The diagnostic accuracy of Cancer Antigen 125 for the diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BJOG. 2016; 123: 1761-1768
        • Fassbender A.
        • Vodolazkaia A.
        • Saunders P.
        • et al.
        Biomarkers of endometriosis.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 1135-1145
        • Fassbender A.
        • Burney R.O.
        • D’Hooghe T F.O.D.
        • Giudice L.
        Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis.
        Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 130854
        • Culley L.
        • Law C.
        • Hudson N.
        • et al.
        The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women's lives: a critical narrative review.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19: 625-639
        • Jacobs I.
        Screening for ovarian cancer by CA-125 measurement.
        Lancet. 1988; 16: 889
        • Barbieri R.L.
        • Niloff J.M.
        • Bast Jr., R.C.
        • Scaetzl E.
        • Kistner R.W.
        • Knapp R.C.
        Elevated serum concentrations of CA-125 in patients with advanced endometriosis.
        Fertil Steril. 1986; 45: 630-634
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Cohen J.F.
        • Gatsonis C.A.
        • Korevaar D.A.
        • STARD group
        STARD 2015: updated reporting guidelines for all diagnostic accuracy studies.
        Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4: 85
        • Saridogan E.
        • Byrne D.
        The British society for gynaecological endoscopy endometriosis centres project.
        Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013; 76: 10-13
        • Hirsch M.
        • Duffy J.M.
        • Kusznir J.O.
        • Davis C.J.
        • Plana M.N.
        • Khan K.S.
        Variation in outcome reporting in endometriosis trials: a systematic review.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214 (Epub 2016 Jan 15): 452-464https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.039
        • Zegers-Hochschild F.
        • Adamson G.D.
        • de Mouzon J.
        • et al
        The International Committee for Monitoring Sssisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009.
        Hum Reprod. 2009; 24: 2683-2687https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep343
        • Dunselman G.A.
        • Vermeulen N.
        • Becker C.
        • et al.
        European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis.
        Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 400-412
        • Wykes C.B.
        • Clark T.J.
        • Khan K.S.
        Accuracy of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic quantitative review.
        BJOG. 2004; 111: 1204-1212
        • Hajian-Tilaki K.
        Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.
        J Biomed Inform. 2014; 48: 193-204
        • Caraguel C.G.
        • Vanderstichel R.
        The two-step Fagan's nomogram: ad hoc interpretation of a diagnostic test result without calculation.
        Evid Based Med. 2013; 18: 125-128
        • Giudice LC1
        • Kao L.C.
        Endometriosis.
        Lancet. 2004; 364: 1789-1799
        • American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Revised american society for reproductive medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996.
        Fertil Steril. 1997; 67: 817-821
        • Hornstein M.D.
        • Thomas P.P.
        • Gleason R.E.
        • Barbieri R.L.
        Menstrual cyclicity of CA-125 in patients with endometriosis.
        Fertil Steril. 1992; 58: 279-283
        • Masahashi T.
        • Matsuzawa K.
        • Ohsawa M.
        • Narita O.
        • Asai T.
        • Ishihara M.
        Serum CA 125 levels in patients with endometriosis: changes in CA 125 levels during menstruation.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 72: 328-331
        • Khan K.N.
        • Fujishita A.
        • Kitajima M.
        • Hiraki K.
        • Nakashima M.
        • Masuzaki H.
        Occult microscopic endometriosis: undetectable by laparoscopy in normal peritoneum.
        Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 462-472
        • Hirsch M.
        • Davis C.J.
        Preoperative assessment and diagnosis of endometriosis: are we any closer?.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 27: 284-290
        • May K.E.
        • Conduit-Hulbert S.A.
        • Villar J.
        • Kirtley S.
        • Kennedy S.H.
        • Becker C.M.
        Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16: 651-674
        • Rogers P.A.
        • D’Hooghe T.M.
        • Fazleabas A.
        • et al.
        Priorities for endometriosis research: recommendations from an international consensus workshop.
        Reprod Sci. 2009; 16: 335-346
        • Mol B.W.
        • Bayram N.
        • Lijmer J.G.
        • et al.
        The performance of CA-125 measurement in the detection of endometriosis: a meta-analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: 1101-1108