We congratulate the authors on undertaking a prospective study with the clearly defined
aim of evaluating the haemodynamic profile in preeclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction
(FGR). Despite the robust methodology, we would like to highlight some important limitations
to their findings and interpretation of data.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM®) can predict the evolution of uteroplacental disease- results of the prospective HANDLE study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 216: 116-124
- Maternal cardiac output between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation in the prediction of preeclampsia and small for gestational age.Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 292-300
- Angiogenic markers and cardiovascular indices in the prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Hypertension. 2017; 69: 1192-1197
- Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 32-38
- Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 333-339
- Risk of post-pregnancy hypertension in women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: nationwide cohort study.BMJ. 2017; 358: j3078
Article info
Publication history
Published online: November 09, 2017
Received:
October 13,
2017
Identification
Copyright
© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
