Full length article| Volume 220, P74-78, January 2018

Sacrocolpopexy with polyvinylidene fluoride mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: Mid term comparative outcomes with polypropylene mesh

Published:November 21, 2017DOI:



      The aim of this study was to compare the surgical, anatomical, and functional outcomes of sacrocolpopexy (SCP) using polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh versus SCP using the standard polypropylene (PP) mesh.

      Study design

      This was a retrospective single centre case-control study including female patients who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal SCP for POP with either PP (Cousin Biotech®) or PVDF (DynaMesh®-PRS) mesh between March 2005 and May 2015. Anatomical outcomes were assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Functional outcomes included voiding and storage urinary symptoms (VS and SS, respectively), urgency and stress urinary incontinence (UUI and SUI) and sexual dysfunction (SD). Symptoms and their impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL) were assessed using validated questionnaires as Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Global patient perception of improvement (PGI-I questionnaire) and mesh erosion rates were also recorded.


      Of the 166 patients enrolled, 136 could be included in the analysis: 73 in the PP group and 63 in the PVDF group. The mean follow-up was 94± 17.31 months for the PP and 25.6± 13.8 months for the PVDF group. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics and preoperative clinical characteristics. Postoperative anatomical correction were not significantly different between the two groups. The PVDF group showed superior results in term of storage symptoms (PVDF = 0% versus PP = 8.2%; p = 0.02) and lower rate of sexual dysfunction (PVDF = 0% versus PP = 16,4%; p = 0.001). Only 1 patient in PP group and 2 in PVDF group (p = 0.47) presented a mesh exposure. There was no statistical difference in PGI-I scores (PP = 1.5 ± 1.0 vs PVDF = 1.8 ± 0.5; p = 0.40).


      Our findings suggest that both meshes can be safely and effectively used with good anatomical outcomes. Interestingly, PVDF use was associated with significantly less storage symptoms and sexual dysfunction.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


        • Haylen B.T.
        • de Ridder D.
        • Freeman R.M.
        • Swift S.E.
        • Berghmans B.
        • Lee J.
        • et al.
        An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.
        Int. Urogynecol. J. 2010; 21: 5-26
        • Shah A.D.
        • Kohli N.
        • Rajan S.S.
        • Hoyte L.
        The age, distribution, rate, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA.
        Int. Urogynecol. J. 2008; 19: 421-428
        • Illiano E.
        • Giannitsas K.
        • Zucchi A.
        • Di Biase M.
        • Del Zingaro M.
        • Bini V.
        Costantini E Sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up.
        Int. Urogynecol. J. 2016; 27: 1563-1569
        • Colaco M.
        • Mettu J.
        • Badlani G.
        The scientific basis for the use of biomaterials in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
        BJU Int. 2015; 115: 859-866
        • Macintyre I.M.
        Best practice in groin hernia repair.
        Br. J. Surg. 2003; 90: 131-132
        • Taylor S.G.
        • O’Dwyer P.J.
        Chronic groin sepsis following tension-free inguinal hernioplasty.
        Br. J. Surg. 1999; 86: 562-565
        • Leber G.E.
        • Garb J.L.
        • Alexander A.I.
        • et al.
        Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional her-nias.
        Arch. Surg. 1998; 133: 378-382
        • Deysine M.
        Pathophysiology, prevention, and management of prosthetic infections in hernia surgery.
        Surg. Clin. North Am. 1998; 78: 1105-11015
        • McLanahan D.
        • King L.T.
        • Weems C.
        • et al.
        Retrorectus pros- theticmesh repair ofmidline abdominal hernia.
        Am. J. Surg. 1997; 173: 445-449
        • Schneider R.
        • Herrington Jr., J.L.
        • Granda A.M.
        Marlex mesh in repair of a diaphragmatic defect later eroding into the distal esophagus and stomach.
        Am. Surg. 1979; 45: 337-339
        • Fitzgerald P.G.
        • Walton J.M.
        Intratracheal granuloma formation: a late complication of Marlex mesh splinting for tracheomalacia.
        J. Pediatr. Surg. 1996; 31: 1568-1569
        • Conze J.
        • Junge K.
        • Weiss C.
        • et al.
        New polymer for intra-abdominal meshes?PVDF copolymer.
        J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2008; 87: 321-328
        • Klinge U.
        • Klosterhalfen B.
        • Ottinger A.P.
        • et al.
        PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes.
        Biomaterials. 2002; 23: 3487-3493
      1. Heesakkers J. Chapple C. De Ridder D. Farag F. Practical Functional Urology. © Springer International Publishing, Switzerland2016
        • Bump R.C.
        • Mattiasson A.
        • Bø K.
        • Brubaker L.P.
        • DeLancey J.O.
        • Klarskov P.
        • et al.
        Smith AR The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 175: 10-17

        • Costantini E.
        • Mearini L.
        • Lazzeri et al M.
        Laparoscopic versus abdominal Sacrocolpopexy:A randomized.
        Controlled Trial J. Urol. 2016; 196: 159-165
        • Uebersax J.S.
        • Wyman J.F.
        • Shumaker S.A.
        • McClish D.K.
        • Fantl J.A.
        Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group.
        Neurourol. Urodyn. 1995; 14: 131-139
        • Artibani W.
        • Pesce F.
        • Prezioso D.
        • Scarpa R.M.
        • Zattoni F.
        • Tubaro A.
        • et al.
        Italian validation of the urogenital distress inventory and its application in LUTS patients.
        Eur. Urol. 2006; 50: 1323-1329
        • Filocamo M.T.
        • Serati M.
        • Li Marzi V.
        • Costantini E.
        • et al.
        The female sexual function index (FSFI): linguistic validation of the italian version.
        J. Sex Med. 2014 Feb; 11: 447-453
        • Srikrishna S.
        • Robinson D.
        • Cardozo L.
        Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse.
        Int. Urogynecol. J. 2010; 21: 523
        • Bernard Haylen T.
        • Robert Freeman M.
        • Steven Swift E.
        • et al.
        An International Urogynecological Association(IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) jointterminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants,tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery.
        Int. Urogynecol. J. 2011; 22: 3-15
        • Rajshekhar
        • et al.
        Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
        Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2016; 135: 182-186
        • Gerullis H.1
        • Klosterhalfen B.
        • Borós M.
        • Lammers B.
        • et al.
        IDEAL in meshes for prolapse, urinary incontinence, and hernia repair.
        Surg. Innov. 2013 Oct; 20: 502-508
        • Klink C.D.
        • Junge K.
        • Binnebösel M.
        • Alizai H.P.
        • Otto J.
        • Neumann U.P.
        U:Comparison of long-Term biocompatibility of PVDF and PP.
        Meshes J. Invest. Surg. 2016; 24: 292-299
        • Muhl T.
        • Binnebosel M.
        • Klinge U.
        • Goedderz T.
        New objective measurement to characterize the porosity of textile implants.
        J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2008; 84: 176-183
        • Feiner B.
        • Maher C.
        Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 325-330
        • Maher C.F.
        • Qatawneh A.
        • Dwyer P.L.
        • Carey M.P.
        • Cornish A.
        • Schluter P.
        Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized trial.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 190: 20-26
        • Ganj F.A.
        • Ibeanu O.A.
        • Bedestani A.
        • Nolan T.E.
        Chesson RR Complications of transvaginal monofilament polypropylene mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair.
        Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20: 919-925
        • Maher C.
        • Feiner B.
        • Baessler K.
        • Schmid C.
        Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;