Advertisement
Full length article| Volume 241, P1-5, October 2019

Decreased fetal movements: Perinatal and long-term neurological outcomes

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally.
    Omri Zamstein
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Soroka University Medical Center POB 151, Beer-Sheva, IL, Israel.
    Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally.
    Affiliations
    The Obstetrics and Gynecology Division, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally.
    Tamar Wainstock
    Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally.
    Affiliations
    The Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Eyal Sheiner
    Affiliations
    The Obstetrics and Gynecology Division, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally.

      Abstract

      Background

      While maternal perception of decreased fetal movements during advanced stages of pregnancy may be an indicator for adverse perinatal outcome, the long-term neurological outcome of offspring of affected pregnancies remains largely unknown.

      Objective

      To examine whether maternal complaint of decreased fetal movements is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, and to assess the implications of decreased fetal movements on long-term neurological morbidity of the offspring.

      Study design

      A single center cohort analysis including deliveries between the years 1991–2014 was conducted. The association between decreased fetal movements and adverse perinatal outcome was evaluated using a general estimation equation (GEE) multivariable analyses. Incidence of hospitalizations (up to age 18 years) due to various neurological conditions was compared between offspring of affected pregnancies, and those who were not, using a Kaplan-Meyer survival curve. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for confounders.

      Results

      439 (0.18%) of 242,342 deliveries included in this study were accompanied by maternal complaint of decreased fetal movements. Perinatal outcome was comparable between the groups, with no cases of perinatal mortality observed among the exposed group. Total neurological-related hospitalization rate of the offspring, as well as hospitalizations due to movement disorders, were higher among the exposed group (Kaplan-Meyer log-rank test P < 0.05). This association between decreased fetal movements and increased long-term neurological hospitalization proved to be independent of potential confounders with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.54 (95% CI 1.0–2.37).

      Conclusion

      Maternal complaint of decreased fetal movements does not predict adverse perinatal outcome but is associated with an elevated risk for long-term neurological morbidity of the offspring.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

      1. Fetal assessment.
        in: Cunningham F. Leveno K.J. Bloom S.L. Dashe J.S. Hoffman B.L. Casey B.M. Williams obstetrics, 25e. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY2018 (Accessed December 03)
        • de Vries J.I.
        • Fong B.F.
        Normal fetal motility: an overview.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 27: 701
        • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
        Reduced fetal movements. RCOG Green-top Guideline No 57.
        RCOG, 2011
        • Lai J.
        • Nowlan N.C.
        • Vaidyanathan R.
        • Shaw C.J.
        • Lees C.C.
        Fetal movements as a predictor of health.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95: 968-975https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12944
        • Binder J.
        • Monaghan C.
        • Thilaganathan B.
        • Morales-Roselló J.
        • Khalil A.
        Reduced fetal movements and cerebroplacental ratio: evidence for worsening fetal hypoxemia.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51: 375-380https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18830
        • Signore C.
        • Freeman R.K.
        • Spong C.Y.
        Antenatal testing: a reevaluation. Executive Summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 68
        • Unterscheider J.
        • Horgan R.
        • O’Donoghue K.
        • Greene R.
        Reduced fetal movements.
        J SOGC. 2009; 11: 245-251https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.11.4.245.27527
        • Hijazi Z.R.
        • East C.E.
        Factors affecting maternal perception of fetal movement.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009; 64: 489
        • Mangesi L.
        • Hofmeyr G.J.
        • Smith V.
        • Smyth R.M.
        Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;
      2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 145: antepartum fetal surveillance.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 182-192
        • Froen J.F.
        • Heazell A.E.P.
        • Holm Tveit J.P.
        • Saastad E.
        • Fretts R.C.
        • Flenady V.
        Fetal movement assessment.
        Semin Perinatol. 2008; 32: 243
        • Holm Tveit J.V.
        • Saastad E.
        • Stray-Pedersen B.
        • Børdahl P.E.
        • Frøen J.F.
        Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women presenting with decreased fetal movements in late pregnancy.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88: 1345-1351https://doi.org/10.3109/00016340903348375
        • Efkarpidis S.
        • Alexopoulos E.
        • Kean L.
        • Liu D.
        • Fay T.
        Case-control study of factors associated with intrauterine fetal deaths.
        MedGenMed. 2004; 6: 53
        • Saastad E.
        • Winje B.A.
        • Stray Penderson B.
        • Frøen J.F.
        Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes—a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial.
        PLoS One. 2011; 6e28482
        • O’Sullivan O.
        • Stephen G.
        • Martindale E.
        • Heazell A.E.
        Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 29: 705-710
        • Dutton P.J.
        • Warrander L.K.
        • Roberts S.A.
        • et al.
        Predictors of poor perinatal outcome following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements--a prospective cohort study.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7 (Epub 2012 7 11): e39784
        • Aviram A.
        • Shmueli A.
        • Hiersch L.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy outcome in women with decreased sensation of fetal movements at term according to parity.
        Birth. 2016; 43 (Epub 2015 Dec 8): 42-48https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12205
        • Warrander L.K.
        • Batra G.
        • Bernatavicius G.
        • et al.
        Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with altered placental structure and function.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7e34851
        • Harrington K.
        • Thompson O.
        • Jorden L.
        • Page J.
        • Carpenter R.G.
        • Campbell S.
        Obstetric outcomes in women who present with a reduction in fetal movements in the third trimester of pregnancy.
        J Perinat Med. 1998; 26: 77
      3. Central bureau of statistics. Israel in figures.
        2016 ([Accessed: December 1, 2018])
        • Clarfield A.M.
        • Manor O.
        • Nun G.B.
        • et al.
        Health and health care in Israel: an introduction.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 2503-2513https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30636-0
        • Gourounti K.
        Psychological stress and adjustment in pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: a systematic review.
        Women Health. 2016; 56: 98-118https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2015.1074642
        • Okby R.
        • Druyan Y.
        • Sonenklar M.
        • Aricha-Tamir B.
        • Sacks K.N.
        • Sheiner E.
        Fertility treatment as a risk factor for maternal request of cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 294 (Epub 2016 Jul 13): 1183-1187
        • Sheiner E.
        • Shoham-Vardi I.
        • Hershkovitz R.
        • Katz M.
        • Mazor M.
        Infertility treatment is an independent risk factor for cesarean section among nulliparous women aged 40 and above.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 888-892
        • Heazell A.E.
        • Bernatavicius G.
        • Roberts S.A.
        • et al.
        A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation--a feasibility study.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13: 95
        • Norman J.E.
        • Heazelll A.E.
        • Rodriguez A.
        • et al.
        Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2018;
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Rice M.M.
        • Reddy U.M.
        • et al.
        Eunice kennedy shriver national institute of child health and human development maternal–Fetal medicine units network. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 513-523
        • Scala C.
        • Bhide A.
        • Familiari A.
        • et al.
        Number of episodes of reduced fetal movement at term: association with adverse perinatal outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213 (e1): 678
        • Ravenscroft G.
        • Sollis E.
        • Charles A.K.
        • North K.N.
        • Baynam G.
        • Laing N.G.
        Fetal akinesia: review of the genetics of the neuromuscular causes.
        J Med Genet. 2011; 48 (Epub 2011 Oct 7): 793-801https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100211
        • de Vries J.I.
        • Fong B.F.
        Changes in fetal motility as a result of congenital disorders: an overview.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 29: 590-599
        • James D.K.
        • Telfer F.M.
        • Keating N.A.
        • Blair M.E.
        • Wilcox M.A.
        • Chilvers C.
        Reduced fetal movements and maternal medication - new pregnancy risk factors for neurodevelopmental disability in childhood.
        J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2000; 20: 226-234
        • Levine T.A.
        • Grunau R.E.
        • McAuliffe F.M.
        • Pinnamaneni R.
        • Foran A.
        • Alderdice F.A.
        Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review.
        Pediatrics. 2015; 135: 126
        • Heazell A.E.
        • Frøen J.F.
        Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise.
        J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2008; 28: 147-154https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610801912618