Advertisement

Higher live birth rate with stimulated rather than artificial cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer

Published:October 30, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.040

      Abstract

      Objective

      To study which endometrial preparation allows a better ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and live birth rate (LBR) after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) between mild gonadotropin ovarian stimulation (OS) and artificial cycles (AC).

      Study design

      Retrospective follow-up study including all FET performed in one fertility center from 2013 to 2016. In the OS group, gonadotropins were followed by r-hCG triggering. Vaginal micronized progesterone (200 mg/day) was given systematically. In the AC group, estradiol (E2) was started on Day 1. Vaginal micronized progesterone (600 mg/d) was added to E2 for 12 weeks. Data were analyzed using a multiple regression model.

      Results

      Among 1021 FETs, 35% underwent OS preparation, 65% had an AC. As expected, patients in the AC group suffered more from endometriosis (18.5% vs. 12.9%; p = .021) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (21.7% vs. 10.9%; p < .0001) than patients in the OS group. There was no difference between groups with respect to endometrial thickness, number of embryos transferred, development stage at FET, cryopreservation technique. Despite a similar clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (24.4% vs. 20.8%; p = .189), the OPR was significantly higher in the OS than in the AC group (17.9% vs. 11%; p = .002), leading to an increased LBR (17.1% vs. 9.8%; p < .001). After adjusting for parameters usually linked to early pregnancy losses or potential bias (patient age at freezing, smoking status, PCOS, endometriosis, rank of transfer and previous miscarriages), the results remained significant.

      Conclusion

      Despite a similar CPR, LBR was significantly higher with mild OS than with the AC preparation, even after adjusting for potential confounders. In light of these results, the first-line endometrial preparation could be OS instead of an AC. In an AC, a potential defect of the luteal phase may exist, treatment could be optimized to avoid pregnancy losses. A randomized controlled trial should be undertaken to assess the role of OS and ACs in FET.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM)
        • European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)
        • Kupka M.S.
        • D’Hooghe T.
        • Ferraretti A.P.
        • de Mouzon J.
        • et al.
        Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
        Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2016; 31: 233-248
        • European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM)
        • European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)
        • Calhaz-Jorge C.
        • De Geyter C.
        • Kupka M.S.
        • de Mouzon J.
        • et al.
        Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
        Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2017; 32: 1957-1973
      1. LLacer J. Subcutaneous progesterone is evaluated better by patients performing embryo transfer in substitued cycles. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Oral Presentation O-200. ASRM San Antonio 2017.

        • Groenewoud E.R.
        • Cantineau A.E.P.
        • Kollen B.J.
        • Macklon N.S.
        • Cohlen B.J.
        What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19: 458-470
        • Ghobara T.
        • Vandekerckhove P.
        Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; CD003414
        • Glujovsky D.
        • Pesce R.
        • Fiszbajn G.
        • Sueldo C.
        • Hart R.J.
        • Ciapponi A.
        Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; CD006359
        • Groenewoud E.R.
        • Cohlen B.J.
        • Al-Oraiby A.
        • Brinkhuis E.A.
        • Broekmans F.J.M.
        • de Bruin J.P.
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer.
        Hum Reprod. 2016; 31: 1483-1492
        • Ortega I.
        • Velasco J.A.G.
        Progesterone supplementation in the frozen embryo transfer cycle.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 27: 253-257
        • Cerrillo M.
        • Herrero L.
        • Guillén A.
        • Mayoral M.
        • García-Velasco J.A.
        Impact of endometrial preparation protocols for frozen embryo transfer on live birth rates.
        Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017; ([cited 2017 Jun 8]; 8. Available from:)
        • Mounce G.
        • McVeigh E.
        • Turner K.
        • Child T.J.
        Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement in vitro fertilization.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 104 (e1): 915-920
        • Lathi R.B.
        • Chi Y.-Y.
        • Liu J.
        • Saravanabavanandhan B.
        • Hegde A.
        • Baker V.L.
        Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32: 1057-1062
        • Orvieto R.
        • Feldman N.
        • Lantsberg D.
        • Manela D.
        • Zilberberg E.
        • Haas J.
        Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer-can we improve cycle outcome?.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33: 611-615
        • Guan Y.
        • Fan H.
        • Styer A.K.
        • Xiao Z.
        • Li Z.
        • Zhang J.
        • et al.
        A modified natural cycle results in higher live birth rate in vitrified-thawed embryo transfer for women with regular menstruation.
        Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016; 62: 335-342
        • Zheng Y.
        • Dong X.
        • Huang B.
        • Zhang H.
        • Ai J.
        The artificial cycle method improves the pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.
        Gynecol Endocrinol Off J Int Soc Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015; 31: 70-74
        • Tomás C.
        • Alsbjerg B.
        • Martikainen H.
        • Humaidan P.
        Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer—a comparison of three protocols.
        Fertil Steril. 2012; 98: 1165-1169
        • Givens C.R.
        • Markun L.C.
        • Ryan I.P.
        • Chenette P.E.
        • Herbert C.M.
        • Schriock E.D.
        Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen-thawed embryo transfers.
        Reprod Biomed. 2009; : 380-384
        • Yarali H.
        • Polat M.
        • Mumusoglu S.
        • Yarali I.
        • Bozdag G.
        Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33: 1287-1304
        • Hatoum I.
        • Bellon L.
        • Swierkowski N.
        • Ouazana M.
        • Bouba S.
        • Fathallah K.
        • et al.
        Disparities in reproductive outcomes according to the endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; : 1-5
        • Dor J.
        • Rudak E.
        • Davidson A.
        • Levran D.
        • Ben-Rafael Z.
        • Mashiach S.
        Endocrine and biological factors influencing implantation of human embryos following cryopreservation.
        Gynecol Endocrinol Off J Int Soc Gynecol Endocrinol. 1991; 5: 203-211
        • Konc J.
        • Kanyo K.
        • Varga E.
        • Kriston R.
        • Cseh S.
        The effect of cycle regimen used for endometrium preparation on the outcome of day 3 frozen embryo transfer cycle.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 767-768
        • Yu J.
        • Ma Y.
        • Wu Z.
        • Li Y.
        • Tang L.
        • Li Y.
        • et al.
        Endometrial preparation protocol of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 291: 201-211
        • Groenewoud E.R.
        • Cantineau A.E.P.
        • Kollen B.J.
        • Macklon N.S.
        • Cohlen B.J.
        What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2017; 23: 255-261
        • Wright K.P.
        • Guibert J.
        • Weitzen S.
        • Davy C.
        • Fauque P.
        • Olivennes F.
        Artificial versus stimulated cycles for endometrial preparation prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
        Reprod Biomed. 2006; 13: 321-325
        • Wilcox A.J.
        • Baird D.D.
        • Weinberg C.R.
        Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy.
        N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 1796-1799
        • Yovich J.L.
        • Conceicao J.L.
        • Stanger J.D.
        • Hinchliffe P.M.
        • Keane K.N.
        Mid-luteal serum progesterone concentrations govern implantation rates for cryopreserved embryo transfers conducted under hormone replacement.
        Reprod Biomed. 2015; 31: 180-191
        • Kofinas J.D.
        • Blakemore J.
        • McCulloh D.H.
        • Grifo J.
        Serum progesterone levels greater than 20 ng/dl on day of embryo transfer are associated with lower live birth and higher pregnancy loss rates.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32: 1395-1399
        • van de Vijver A.
        • Polyzos N.P.
        • Van Landuyt L.
        • Mackens S.
        • Stoop D.
        • Camus M.
        • et al.
        What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2016; 31: 1097-1104
        • Merriam K.S.
        • Leake K.A.
        • Elliot M.
        • Matthews M.L.
        • Usadi R.S.
        • Hurst B.S.
        Sexual absorption of vaginal progesterone: a randomized control trial.
        Int J Endocrinol. 2015; 2015685281
        • Devine K.
        • Richter K.S.
        • Widra E.A.
        • McKeeby J.L.
        Vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles with the use of only vaginal progesterone replacement with Endometrin have inferior ongoing pregnancy rates: results from the planned interim analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
        Fertil Steril. 2018; 109: 266-275
        • Haddad G.
        • Saguan D.A.
        • Maxwell R.
        • Thomas M.A.
        Intramuscular route of progesterone administration increases pregnancy rates during non-downregulated frozen embryo transfer cycles.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007; 24: 467-470
        • Kaser D.J.
        • Ginsburg E.S.
        • Missmer S.A.
        • Correia K.F.
        • Racowsky C.
        Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support for day 3 cryopreserved embryo transfer.
        Fertil Steril. 2012; 98: 1464-1469
        • Shapiro D.B.
        • Pappadakis J.A.
        • Ellsworth N.M.
        • Hait H.I.
        • Nagy Z.P.
        Progesterone replacement with vaginal gel versus i.m. injection: cycle and pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastocysts.
        Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2014; 29: 1706-1711
        • Wang Y.
        • He Y.
        • Zhao X.
        • Ji X.
        • Hong Y.
        • Wang Y.
        • et al.
        Crinone gel for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized clinical trial in the Chinese population.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0133027
        • Leonard P.H.
        • Hokenstad A.N.
        • Khan Z.
        • Jensen J.R.
        • Stewart E.A.
        • Coddington C.C.
        Progesterone support for frozen embryo transfer: intramuscular versus vaginal suppository demonstrates no difference in a cohort.
        J Reprod Med. 2015; 60: 103-108
        • Mackens S.
        • Santos-Ribeiro S.
        • van de Vijver A.
        • Racca A.
        • Van Landuyt L.
        • Tournaye H.
        • et al.
        Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing.
        Hum Reprod. 2017; 32: 2234-2242
        • Zarei A.
        • Sohail P.
        • Parsanezhad M.E.
        • Alborzi S.
        • Samsami A.
        • Azizi M.
        Comparison of four protocols for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed Embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 295: 239-246
        • Toth T.L.
        • Vaughan D.A.
        Optimizing luteal support in frozen embryo transfer cycles.
        Fertil Steril. 2018; 109: 242-243
        • Alsbjerg B.
        • Polyzos N.P.
        • Elbaek H.O.
        • Povlsen B.B.
        • Andersen C.Y.
        • Humaidan P.
        Increasing vaginal progesterone gel supplementation after frozen-thawed embryo transfer significantly increases the delivery rate.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 26: 133-137
        • Casper R.F.
        • Yanushpolsky E.H.
        Optimal endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer cycles: window of implantation and progesterone support.
        Fertil Steril. 2016; 105: 867-872
        • Miles R.A.
        • Paulson R.J.
        • Lobo R.A.
        • Press M.F.
        • Dahmoush L.
        • Sauer M.V.
        Pharmacokinetics and endometrial tissue levels of progesterone after administration by intramuscular and vaginal routes: a comparative study.
        Fertil Steril. 1994; 62: 485-490