Advertisement
Full length article| Volume 259, P26-31, April 2021

Download started.

Ok

Does pregnancy affect pelvic floor functional anatomy? A retrospective study

  • Ixora Kamisan Atan
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Present address at: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latiff, Cheras, 53000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    Affiliations
    Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62, Derby Street, Kingswood, 2747 NSW, Australia

    Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latiff, Cheras, 53000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Wenyu Zhang
    Affiliations
    Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62, Derby Street, Kingswood, 2747 NSW, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ka Lai Shek
    Affiliations
    Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62, Derby Street, Kingswood, 2747 NSW, Australia

    Liverpool Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, Western Sydney University, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hans Peter Dietz
    Affiliations
    Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62, Derby Street, Kingswood, 2747 NSW, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 27, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.047

      Highlights

      • Compared to nulliparas, women delivered exclusively by Caesarean Section (CS) show increased pelvic organ descent on Valsalva.
      • Greater tissue displacement on pelvic floor muscle contraction is observed in women who delivered exclusively by CS, compared to nulliparas.
      • Increased tissue elasticity/ compliance or reduced stiffness may be a result of permanent hormonal and/or mechanical effect of pregnancy.

      Abstract

      Objective

      Vaginal childbirth is an established main aetiological factor in the pathogenesis of female pelvic floor dysfunction. However, pregnancy itself is also likely to have an effect. This study investigated the effect of pregnancy on pelvic floor functional anatomy.

      Study design

      This was a retrospective observational study involving vaginally nulliparous women who presented to a tertiary urogynaecology unit with symptoms and signs of pelvic floor dysfunction between 2006 and 2014. Nulliparous women were compared with those who delivered exclusively by Caesarean Section (CS). All had undergone a standardised clinical interview, ICS POP-Q assessment and 3D/4D translabial pelvic floor ultrasound. Main outcome measures included sonographically determined pelvic organ position and hiatal dimensions on Valsalva and pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFMC).

      Results

      Of 2930 women seen during the study period, 242 had never given birth vaginally. One hundred and twenty-nine (53 %) were nulliparous, and 113 (47 %) were delivered by CS only. The CS group demonstrated significantly higher pelvic organ mobility in the anterior compartment (all P < 0.05) and a larger hiatal area on Valsalva (P = 0.004). All sonographic measures of pelvic floor muscle function demonstrated greater tissue displacement on PFMC in the CS group (all P < 0.05).

      Conclusions

      Compared to nulliparas, women who delivered exclusively by CS showed increased pelvic organ descent on Valsalva and tissue displacement on PFMC, implying increased tissue elasticity/ compliance or reduced stiffness, consistent with a small permanent hormonal and/or mechanical effect of pregnancy.

      Abbreviations:

      CS (Caesarean Section), LAM (Levator ani muscle), PFMC (pelvic floor muscle contraction), POP (pelvic organ prolapse), SP (symphysis pubis)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Olsen A.L.
        • Smith V.J.
        • Bergstrom J.O.
        • Colling J.C.
        • Clark A.L.
        Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic-organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 501-506
        • Dietz H.P.
        • Franco A.V.
        • Shek K.L.
        • Kirby A.
        Avulsion injury and levator hiatal ballooning: two independent risk factors for prolapse? An observational study.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91: 211-214
        • Durnea C.
        • Khashan A.
        • Kenny L.
        • Tabirca S.
        • O’Reilly B.
        An insight into pelvic floor status in nulliparous women.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25: 337-345
        • Diez-Itza I.
        • Arrue M.
        • Ibañez L.
        • Paredes J.
        • Murgiondo A.
        • Sarasqueta C.
        Influence of mode of delivery on pelvic organ support 6 months postpartum.
        Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011; 72: 123-129
        • Petersen L.K.
        • Vogel I.
        • Agger A.O.
        • Westergård J.
        • Nils M.
        • Uldbjerg N.
        Variations in serum relaxin (hRLX-2) concentrations during human pregnancy.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995; 74: 251-256
        • Marnach M.L.
        • Ramin K.D.
        • Ramsey P.S.
        • Song S.-W.
        • Stensland J.J.
        • An K.-N.
        Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity anK.-N. maternal hormones in pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101: 331-335
        • Charlton W.P.
        • Coslett-Charlton L.M.
        • Ciccotti M.G.
        Correlation of estradiol in pregnancy and anterior cruciate ligament laxity.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 387: 165-170
        • Van Geelen J.
        • Lemmens W.
        • Eskes T.
        • Martin Jr., C.B.
        The urethral pressure profile in pregnancy and after delivery in healthy nulliparous women.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 144: 636-649
        • Swift S.
        • Ostergard D.
        Effects of progesterone on the urinary tract.
        Int Urogynecol J. 1993; 4: 232-236
        • Kristiansson P.
        • Samuelsson E.
        • Schoultz B.V.
        • Svärdsudd K.
        Reproductive hormones and stress urinary incontinence in pregnancy.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80: 1125-1130
        • Keane D.P.
        • Sims T.J.
        • Abrams P.
        • Bailey A.J.
        Analysis of collagen status in premenopausal nulliparous women with genuine stress incontinence.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 994-998
        • Weppler C.H.
        • Magnusson S.P.
        Increasing muscle extensibility: a matter of increasing length or modifying sensation?.
        Phys Ther. 2010; 90: 438-449
        • Bump R.C.
        • Mattiasson A.
        • Bø K.
        • et al.
        The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 10-17
        • Dietz H.
        Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three‐dimensional or volume imaging.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23: 615-625
        • Orejuela F.J.
        • Shek K.L.
        • Dietz H.P.
        The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23: 175-178
        • Örnö A.-K.
        • Dietz H.
        Levator co‐activation is a significant confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva maneuver.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30: 346-350
        • Dietz H.
        Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two‐dimensional aspects.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23: 80-92
        • Dietz H.
        • Shek C.
        • Clarke B.
        Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three‐dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25: 580-585
        • Dietz H.P.
        Pelvic floor ultrasound in incontinence: what’s in it for the surgeon?.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22: 1085
        • Dietz H.
        • Haylen B.
        • Broome J.
        Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 18: 511-514
        • Dietz H.
        • Wong V.
        • Shek K.
        A simplified method for the determination of levator hiatal dimensions.
        Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011; 51: 540-543
        • Dietz H.
        • Mann K.
        What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25: 451-455
        • Dietz H.
        • Lekskulchai O.
        Ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 29: 688-691
        • Shek K.L.
        • Dietz H.P.
        What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound?.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26: 1783-1787
        • O’Boyle A.L.
        • Woodman P.J.
        • O’Boyle J.D.
        • Davis G.D.
        • Swift S.E.
        Pelvic organ support in nulliparous pregnant and nonpregnant women: a case control study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 99-102
        • Pirpiris A.
        • Shek K.
        • Dietz H.
        Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 36: 507-511
        • Dietz H.P.
        • Shek C.
        • De Leon J.
        • Steensma A.B.
        Ballooning of the levator hiatus.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31: 676-680
        • Rortveit G.
        • Daltveit A.K.
        • Hannestad Y.S.
        • Hunskaar S.
        Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 900-907
        • Stær-Jensen J.
        • Siafarikas F.
        • Hilde G.
        • Bø K.
        • Engh M.E.
        Ultrasonographic evaluation of pelvic organ support during pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 329-336
        • Chan S.
        • Cheung R.
        • Yiu K.
        • Lee L.
        • Chung T.
        Pelvic floor biometry in Chinese primiparous women 1 year after delivery: a prospective observational study.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 466-474
        • Dietz H.P.
        • Rojas R.G.
        • Shek K.L.
        Postprocessing of pelvic floor ultrasound data: how repeatable is it?.
        Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 54: 553-557
        • Majida M.
        • Brækken I.H.
        • Umek W.
        • Bø K.
        • Šaltytė Benth J.
        • Ellstrøm Engh M.
        Interobserver repeatability of three‐and four‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33: 567-573
        • Dietz H.P.
        Prolapse worsens with age, doesn’t it?.
        Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 48: 587-591
        • Cheung R.Y.K.
        • Shek K.L.
        • Chan S.S.C.
        • Chung T.K.H.
        • Dietz H.P.
        Pelvic floor biometry and pelvic organ mobility in East Asian and Caucasian nulliparae.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;
        • Hoyte L.
        • Thomas J.
        • Foster R.T.
        • Shott S.
        • Jakab M.
        • Weidner A.C.
        Racial differences in pelvic morphology among asymptomatic nulliparous women as seen on three-dimensional magnetic resonance images.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 2035-2040