Advertisement
Full length article| Volume 265, P74-79, October 2021

Download started.

Ok

Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): A retrospective study in a single center

      Abstract

      Objective

      Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with histological and biological diversity that cannot be defined as a benign leiomyoma or malignant leiomyosarcoma. The study aims to investigate the diagnostic methods, treatment management and prognosis of STUMP patients in a 13-year period.

      Study design

      We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathologic information of 31 STUMP patients in Peking University People’s Hospital. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the difference of clinical characteristics between the women in myomectomy group and those in hysterectomy group.

      Results

      The most common clinical presentation was menstrual disorder. The tumors were mainly manifested as hypoechoic, non-cystic nodules with low blood flow signal by pelvic doppler ultrasonography. Most tumors carried Ki-67 index ranging from 10% to 30%. Immunohistochemical markers such as ER, PR, p16 and Desmin was positively expressed in tumors. At the first operation, 21 cases underwent myomectomy and 10 cases underwent hysterectomy. The patients in myomectomy group were younger than those in hysterectomy group. In the follow-up period, two cases experienced a relapse in the form of STUMP within 36 months. One case died of cardiovascular accident while the other cases were alive. Six of 21 women in myomectomy group desired pregnancy and two healthy live births were recorded.

      Conclusion

      The diagnosis of STUMP primarily depends on histopathologic features. Fertility-sparing surgery may be a treatment selection for patients with fertility desire. Patients with STUMP, especially in the case of myomectomy, should be informed of recurrence risk and monitored closely.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Kho K.A.
        • Nezhat C.H.
        Evaluating the risks of electric uterine morcellation.
        JAMA. 2014; 311: 905-906https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.1093
        • Kurman R.J.
        • Carcangiu M.L.
        • Herrington C.S.
        • Young R.H.
        World Health Organisation classification of tumors of female reproductive organs.
        4th edn. Lyon Fr Int Agency Res Cancer Press, 2014
        • Bell S.W.
        • Kempson R.L.
        • Hendrickson M.R.
        Problematic uterine smooth neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 1994; 18: 535-558
        • Picerno T.M.
        • Wasson M.N.
        • Gonzalez Rios A.R.
        • et al.
        Morcellation and the incidence of occult uterine malignancy: a dual-institution review.
        Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016; 26: 149-155https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000558
        • Zheng Y.Y.
        • Liu X.B.
        • Mao Y.Y.
        • Lin M.H.
        Smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): a clinicopathologic analysis of 26 cases.
        Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2020; 13 (eCollection 2020): 818-826
        • Huo L.
        • Wang D.
        • Wang W.
        • Cao D.
        • Yang J.
        • Wu M.
        • et al.
        Oncologic and reproductive outcomes of uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a single center retrospective study of 67 cases.
        Front Oncol. 2020; 10: 647https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00647
        • Sahin H.
        • Karatas F.
        • Coban G.
        • et al.
        Uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: fertility and clinical outcomes.
        J Gynecol Oncol. 2019; 30: e54https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e54
        • Ng J.S.
        • Han A.
        • Chew S.H.
        • Low J.
        A clinicopathologic study of uterine smooth muscle tumours of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP).
        Ann Acad Med Singap. 2010; 39: 625-628
        • Bacanakgil B.H.
        • Deveci M.
        • Karabuk E.
        • Soyman Z.
        Uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: clinicopathologic-sonographic characteristics, follow-up and recurrence.
        World J Oncol. 2017; 8: 76-80https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1031w
        • Bonneau C.
        • Thomassin-Naggara I.
        • Dechoux S.
        • Cortez A.
        • Darai E.
        • Rouzier R.
        Value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the characterization of uterine mesenchymal tumors.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93: 261-268https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12325
        • Ha H.I.
        • Choi M.C.
        • Heo J.H.
        • Kim K.A.
        • Jung S.G.
        • Park H.
        • et al.
        A clinicopathologic review and obstetric outcome of uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) in a single institution.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rprod Biol. 2018; 228: 1-5https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.003
        • Gupta M.
        • Laury A.L.
        • Nucci M.R.
        • Quade B.J.
        Predictors of adverse outcome in uterine smooth muscle tumours of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): a clinicopathological analysis of 22 cases with a proposal for the inclusion of additional histological parameters.
        Histopathology. 2018; 73: 284-298https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13515
        • Chen L.W.
        • Bin Y.
        Immunohistochemical analysis of p16, p53, and Ki-67 expression in uterine smooth muscle tumors.
        Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008; 27: 326-332https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0b013e31815ea7f5
        • Petrović D.
        • Babić D.
        • Forko J.I.
        • Martinac I.
        Expression of Ki-67, P53 and progesterone receptors in uterine smooth muscle tumors. Diagnostic value.
        Coll Antropol. 2010; 34: 93-97
        • Ip P.P.
        • Lim D.
        • Cheung A.N.Y.
        • Oliva E.
        Immunoexpression of P16 in uterine leiomyomas with infarct-type necrosis: an analysis of 35 cases.
        Histopathology. 2017; 71: 743-750https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13282
        • Guntupalli S.R.
        • Ramirez P.T.
        • Anderson M.L.
        • Milan M.R.
        • Bodurka D.C.
        • Malpica A.
        Uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a retrospective analysis.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 113: 324-326https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.020
        • Mowers E.L.
        • Skinner B.
        • McLean K.
        • Reynolds R.K.
        Effects of morcellation of uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential and endometrial stromal sarcoma: case series and recommendations for clinical practice.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 601-606https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.007
        • Peeters N.
        • Hulsbosch S.
        • Ballaux F.
        • Baekelandt J.
        Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential: analysis of diagnoses and therapies illustrated by two case reports.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2016; 37: 367-373
        • Rizzo A.
        • Ricci A.D.
        • Saponara M.
        • et al.
        Recurrent uterine smooth-muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): state of the art.
        Anticancer Res. 2020; 40: 1229-1238https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14064
        • Ip P.P.
        • Cheung A.N.
        • Clement P.B.
        Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): a clinicopathologic analysis of 16 cases.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; 33: 992-1005https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181a02d1c
        • Croce S.
        • Ribeiro A.
        • Brulard C.
        • et al.
        Uterine smooth muscle tumor analysis by comparative genomic hybridization: a useful diagnostic tool in challenging lesions.
        Mod Pathol. 2015; 28: 1001-1010https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.3
        • Croce S.
        • Ducoulombier A.
        • Ribeiro A.
        • et al.
        Genome profiling is an efficient tool to avoid the STUMP classification of uterine smooth muscle lesions: a comprehensive array-genomic hybridization analysis of 77 tumors.
        Mod Pathol. 2018; 31: 816-828https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2017.185
        • Peters 3rd, W.A.
        • Howard D.R.
        • Andersen W.A.
        • Figge D.C.
        Uterine smoothmuscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 1015-1020https://doi.org/10.1097/0000625