Advertisement
Full length article| Volume 265, P113-118, October 2021

Vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries among parturients with congenital uterine anomalies; risk factors and outcomes

  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors equally contributed to this work.
    Reut Rotem
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Bayit Street, Jerusalem 91031, Israel.
    Footnotes
    1 These authors equally contributed to this work.
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors equally contributed to this work.
    Moshe Barg
    Footnotes
    1 These authors equally contributed to this work.
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hen Y. Sela
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Misgav Rottenstreich
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel

    Department of Nursing, Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors equally contributed to this work.

      Highlights

      • Data regarding instrumental deliveries in those with malformed uterus is scares.
      • In this study, maternal and neonatal outcomes in this population were examined.
      • Instrumental vaginal deliveries were associated with unfavorable maternal outcomes.
      • Aside from birth trauma, neonatal results did not differ between the groups.
      • These findings should be presented during consultations about modes of delivery.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) in a subset of parturients with congenital uterine anomalies.

      Study Design

      A retrospective database study was conducted at a single tertiary center between 2005 and 2019. Parturients with known congenital uterine anomalies who had vaginal deliveries were enrolled, whereas parturients with failed VAVD, didelphic uterus, and delivery after intrauterine fetal death were excluded. Various maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between parturients who achieved spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and those who delivered via VAVD. The maternal composite outcome was calculated for each group and included one or more of the following: post-partum hemorrhage, hemoglobin drop ≥ 4 gr/dL, blood transfusions, retained placental products, and obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Univariate analysis was performed followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for potential confounders. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

      Results

      After the application of the exclusion criteria, 332 parturients were found eligible. Of those, 289 (87%) had SVD and 43 (13%) had VAVD. VAVD was more common among primiparous parturients and epidural analgesia users. Parturients with VAVD had higher rates of third-degree perineal tear, postpartum hemorrhage, and blood transfusions. The maternal composite outcome was significantly more prevalent in the VAVD group (44.2% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.01). After controlling for potential confounders, the maternal composite outcome was found to be independently associated with VAVD (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.10–4.60). The neonatal results were overall comparable, except for scalp trauma and Erb’s palsy/clavicular fracture, which were more prevalent in the VAVD group.

      Conclusion

      In a special population of parturients with congenital uterine anomalies, VAVD was found to be associated with significantly higher rates of adverse maternal outcomes and perinatal birth trauma. These findings should be presented to parturients during consultations about modes of delivery.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

      1. K.L.P.T. Moore The Urogenital System. Before We Are Born: Essential of Embryology and Birth Defects 7th ed.; 2008

      2. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions Fertil Steril. 49 6 1988 944 955 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7

        • Grimbizis G.F.
        • Gordts S.
        • Di Spiezio Sardo A.
        • Brucker S.
        • De Angelis C.
        • Gergolet M.
        • et al.
        The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.
        Hum Reprod. 2013; 28: 2032-2044https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det098
        • Acién P.
        • Acién M.
        • Sánchez-Ferrer M.
        Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 2377-2384https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh423
        • Chan Y.Y.
        • Jayaprakasan K.
        • Zamora J.
        • Thornton J.G.
        • Raine-Fenning N.
        • Coomarasamy A.
        The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 761-771https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr028
        • Fox N.S.
        • Roman A.S.
        • Stern E.M.
        • Gerber R.S.
        • Saltzman D.H.
        • Rebarber A.
        Type of congenital uterine anomaly and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
        J Matern neonatal Med Off J Eur Assoc Perinat Med Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc Int Soc Perinat Obstet. 2014; 27: 949-953https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.847082
        • Erez O.
        • Dukler D.
        • Novack L.
        • Rozen A.
        • Zolotnik L.
        • Bashiri A.
        • et al.
        Trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section in patients with uterine Müllerian anomalies: a population-based study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 537.e1-537.e11https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.012
        • Chan Y.Y.
        • Jayaprakasan K.
        • Tan A.
        • Thornton J.G.
        • Coomarasamy A.
        • Raine-Fenning N.J.
        Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38: 371-382https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.10056
        • Baskett T.F.
        Operative vaginal delivery - An historical perspective.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 56: 3-10https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.08.002
        • Gurol-Urganci I.
        • Cromwell D.A.
        • Edozien L.C.
        • Mahmood T.A.
        • Adams E.J.
        • Richmond D.H.
        • et al.
        Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors.
        BJOG. 2013; 120: 1516-1525https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12363
        • Macleod M.
        • Goyder K.
        • Howarth L.
        • Bahl R.
        • Strachan B.
        • Murphy D.J.
        Morbidity experienced by women before and after operative vaginal delivery: prospective cohort study nested within a two-centre randomised controlled trial of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy.
        BJOG. 2013; 120: 1020-1026https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12184
        • Towner D.
        • Castro M.A.
        • Eby-Wilkens E.
        • Gilbert W.M.
        Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury.
        N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 1709-1714https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199912023412301
        • Walsh C.A.
        • Robson M.
        • McAuliffe F.M.
        Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 122-128https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3182749ac9
        • Ngan H.Y.S.
        • Miu P.
        • Ko L.
        • Ma H.K.
        Long-term neurological sequelae following vacuum extractor delivery.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990; 30: 111-114https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.1990.30.issue-210.1111/j.1479-828X.1990.tb03237.x
      3. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results | Human Reproduction Update | Oxford Academic. https://academic-oup-com.szmc-ez.medlcp.tau.ac.il/humupd/article/7/2/161/638048. Accessed July 16, 2020.

      4. RCOG. Operative Vaginal Delivery - Green-top Guideline No. 26. 2011;(26):19. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_26.pdf.

        • Practice Bulletin No
        165 Summary: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128: 226-227https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001521
        • Lund N.S.
        • Persson L.K.G.
        • Jangö H.
        • Gommesen D.
        • Westergaard H.B.
        Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 207: 193-199https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.013
        • Papile L.A.
        The Apgar score in the 21st century.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 519-520https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200102153440709
      5. GG N. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med. 1998;43(10):877-887. https://europepmc.org/article/med/9800671. Accessed August 15, 2021.

        • Grimbizis G.F.
        • Camus M.
        • Tarlatzis B.C.
        • Bontis J.N.
        • Devroey P.
        Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7: 161-174https://doi.org/10.1093/HUMUPD/7.2.161
        • Stein A.L.
        • March C.M.
        Pregnancy outcome in women with müllerian duct anomalies.
        J Reprod Med. 1990; 35: 411-414
      6. Ravasia DJ, Brain PH, Pollard JK. Incidence of uterine rupture among women with mullerian duct anomalies who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Vol 181. Mosby Inc.; 1999:877-881. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70318-2

        • Hiersch L.
        • Yeoshoua E.
        • Miremberg H.
        • Krissi H.
        • Aviram A.
        • Yogev Y.
        • et al.
        The association between Mullerian anomalies and short-term pregnancy outcome.
        J Matern Neonatal Med. 2016; : 1-6https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1098613
        • Cahen-Peretz A.
        • Sheiner E.
        • Friger M.
        • Walfisch A.
        The association between Müllerian anomalies and perinatal outcome.
        J Matern Neonatal Med. 2019; 32: 51-57https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1370703
        • Hiersch L.
        • Bergel-Bson R.
        • Asher D.
        • Aviram A.
        • Gabby-Benziv R.
        • Yogev Y.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for post-partum hemorrhage following vacuum assisted vaginal delivery.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 295: 75-80https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4208-5
        • Hemminki E.
        • Gissler M.
        Epidural analgesia as a risk factor for operative delivery.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996; 53: 125-132https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(95)02641-X
        • Hemminki E.
        • Gissler M.
        Epidural analgesia as a risk factor for operative delivery.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996; 53: 125-132https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(95)02641-X
        • Epplin K.
        • Tuuli M.
        • Odibo A.
        • Roehl K.
        • Macones G.
        • Cahill A.
        Effect of Growth Restriction on Fetal Heart Rate Patterns in the Second Stage of Labor.
        Am J Perinatol. 2015; 32: 873-878https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0000000910.1055/s-005-2983010.1055/s-0034-1543954
        • Ekéus C.
        • Wrangsell K.
        • Penttinen S.
        • Åberg K.
        Neonatal complications among 596 infants delivered by vacuum extraction (in relation to characteristics of the extraction).
        J Matern Neonatal Med. 2017; 31: 1-7https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1344631