Advertisement

The Greek version of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation amongst women with urinary incontinence

Published:November 01, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.025

      Abstract

      Objectives

      As in Greek settings there is a need to develop validated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for pelvic floor dysfunction, this study’s aim was to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ) into Greek, a 42-item PRO for routine urogynaecological evaluation of four domains; bladder, bowel, prolapse and sexual function.

      Study design

      Cross-cultural translation was completed through official multistage forward and back-translation process. Validation involved administering the adapted APFQ (APFQ_GR) to women visiting Greek community-based healthcare settings. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) was also administered. Comparison between women with and without pelvic floor dysfunction (symptomatic versus control) was also undertaken for exploring discriminatory validity. Test-retest reliability was explored by re-administering APFQ_GR 10–15 days following initial testing and internal consistency was explored against each domain separately as well as total items’ score.

      Results

      Greek APFQ translation was successfully performed and piloted to a women sample with varying levels of education for comprehensibility, thus, satisfying the questionnaire’s face validity. 100 women (53.7 ± 13.1 years-old) participated in validation, 63 of which predominantly complained of urinary incontinence (UI) and 37 were asymptomatic. There were no ceiling effects. Floor effects were detected for women without symptoms. Moderate to very strong correlations were yielded between APFQ_GR total score and bladder domain, respectively, with ICIQ-UI SF single-item and total score (ρ = 0.403–0.758, p < 0.001), indicating satisfactory criterion-related validity. Moderate correlations were yielded for the sexual function domain with APFQ_GR total score and weaker correlations were found in the other two domains. Independent samples t-test yielded significant differences across the questionnaire’s scores (p < 0.001), indicating good discriminatory validity between symptomatic and asymptomatic women. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC3,1 = ≥0.998). Internal consistency was very good for each domain and total items’ score (Cronbach’s α = 0.714–0.924).

      Conclusions

      The Greek APFQ was proven appropriate, comprehensible, valid and reliable for women with urinary incontinence and can thus, be used across Greek healthcare settings. Prolapse and bowel domains merit further research.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Good M.M.
        • Solomon E.R.
        Pelvic floor disorders.
        Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019; 46: 527-540
        • Gyhagen M.
        • Åkervall S.
        • Milsom I.
        Clustering of pelvic floor disorders 20 years after one vaginal or one cesarean birth.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26: 1115-1121
        • Milsom I.
        • Altman D.
        • Cartwright R.
        • Lapitan M.C.
        • Nelson R.
        • Sillén U.
        Epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and anal (AI) incontinence.
        in: Abrams P. Cardozo L. Khoury S. Wein A. Incontinence. Health Publications, Paris2013
        • Wu J.M.
        • Vaughan C.P.
        • Goode P.S.
        • Redden D.T.
        • Burgio K.L.
        • Richter H.E.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 141-148
        • Hallock J.L.
        • Handa V.L.
        The epidemiology of pelvic floor disorders and childbirth: an update.
        Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016; 43: 1-13https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
        • Quaghebeur J.
        • Petros P.
        • Wyndaele J.J.
        • Wachter S.D.
        Pelvic-floor function, dysfunction, and treatment.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 265: 143-149
        • Coyne K.
        • Kelleher C.
        Patient reported outcomes: the ICIQ and the state of the art.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2010; 29: 645-651https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20911
        • Habashy E.
        • Mahdy A.E.
        Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pelvic floor disorders.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2019; 20: 22
        • Ralphsmith M.
        • Ahern S.
        • Dean J.
        • Ruseckaite R.
        Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2022;
        • Baessler K.
        • O’Neill S.M.
        • Maher C.F.
        • Battistutta D.
        An interviewer-administered validated female pelvic floor questionnaire for community-based research.
        Menopause. 2008; 15: 973-977
        • Baessler K.
        • O'Neill S.M.
        • Maher C.F.
        • Battistutta D.
        Australian pelvic floor questionnaire: a validated interviewer-administered pelvic floor questionnaire for routine clinic and research.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20: 149-158
        • Baessler K.
        • O'Neill S.M.
        • Maher C.F.
        • Battistutta D.
        A validated self-administered female pelvic floor questionnaire.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21: 163-172
        • Junginger B.
        • Vollhaber H.
        • Baessler K.
        Submaximal pelvic floor muscle contractions: similar bladder-neck elevation, longer duration, less intra-abdominal pressure.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29: 1681-1687
        • Baessler K.
        • Mowat A.
        • Maher C.F.
        The minimal important difference of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30: 115-122
        • Malaekah H.
        • Al Medbel H.S.
        • Al Mowallad S.
        • Al Asiri Z.
        • Albadrani A.
        • Abdullah H.
        Arabic translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire in a Saudi population.
        BMC Womens Health. 2021; 21: 6
        • Hou Y.
        • Hou D.
        Validation of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire in Chinese pregnant and postpartum women.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 245: 102-106
        • Sarıibrahim Astepe B.
        • Köleli I.
        Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of Australian pelvic floor questionnaire in a Turkish population.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 234: 71-74
        • Argirović A.
        • Tulić C.
        • Kadija S.
        • Soldatović I.
        • Babić U.
        • Nale D.
        Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Serbian version of the Australian pelvic floor questionnaire.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26: 131-138
        • Molina-Torres G.
        • Guallar-Bouloc M.
        • Galán-Mercant A.
        • Kasper-Jędrzejewska M.
        • Merchán-Baeza J.A.
        • Gonzalez-Sanchez M.
        Spanish cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire in running women.
        Sci Rep. 2022; 12: 8325
        • Hock M.
        • Tiringer I.
        • Ambrus E.
        • Németh Z.
        • Farkas B.
        Validation and translation of the Hungarian version of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ-H).
        Int Urogynecol J. 2022; ([Online ahead of print. PMID: 35972523 (not full)])https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05322-2
        • Lionis C.
        • Vlachonikolis L.
        • Bathianaki M.
        • Daskalopoulos G.
        • Anifantaki S.
        • Cranidis A.
        Urinary incontinence, the hidden health problem of Cretan women: report from a primary care survey in Greece.
        Women Health. 2000; 31: 59-66
        • Liapis A.
        • Bakas P.
        • Liapi S.
        • Sioutis D.
        • Creatsas G.
        Epidemiology of female urinary incontinence in the Greek population: EURIG study.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21: 217-222
        • Sousa V.D.
        • Rojjanasrirat W.
        Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17: 268-274
        • Athanasiou S.
        • Grigoriadis T.
        • Kyriakidou N.
        • Giannoulis G.
        • Antsaklis A.
        The validation of international consultation on incontinence questionnaires in the Greek language.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2012; 31: 1141-1144
        • Avery K.
        • Donovan J.
        • Peters T.J.
        • Shaw C.
        • Gotoh M.
        • Abrams P.
        ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2004; 23: 322-330
        • Terwee C.B.
        • Bot S.D.
        • de Boer M.R.
        • van der Windt D.A.
        • Knol D.L.
        • Dekker J.
        • et al.
        Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34-42
        • Pinheiro Sobreira Bezerra L.R.
        • Fernandes Britto D.
        • Ribeiro Frota I.P.
        • Lira do Nascimento S.
        • Morais Brilhante A.V.
        • Viana Lucena S.
        • et al.
        The impact of urinary incontinence on sexual function: a systematic review.
        Sex Med Rev. 2020; 8: 393-402