Clinical observation of 2 patients and a literature review of pregnancy outcome after uterine-sparing apical suspension for pelvic organ prolapse

Published:November 09, 2022DOI:



      To observe pregnancy postoperatively and long-term follow-up after uterine-sparing apical suspension for pelvic organ prolapsed (POP).

      Study design

      We report 2 patients who delivered newborns after uterine-sparing apical suspension for pelvic organ prolapse at our center and a literature review on this topic.


      The patients’ ages were 26 and 32 years at their respective times of surgery. The follow-up times were 7 and 8 years. These patients became pregnant at 52 and 46 months after surgery, and delivered by cesarean section at term. There was no re-prolapse at follow-ups of 15 and 10 months postpartum. The results were consistent with those reported in the literature.


      Patients with POP who have reproductive requirements can benefit from surgical treatment, and this benefit is maintained after cesarean section.


      Observation of 2 patients who delivered newborns after uterine-sparing apical suspension for pelvic organ prolapsed at our center and a literature review.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


        • Adegoke T.M.
        • Vragovic O.
        • Yarrington C.D.
        • et al.
        Effect of pregnancy on uterine-sparing pelvic organ prolapse repair.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2020; 31: 657-662
        • Crafoord K.
        • Sydsjo A.
        • Nilsson K.
        • et al.
        Primary surgery of genital prolapse: a shift in treatment tradition.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85: 1104-1108
        • Olsen A.L.
        • Smith V.J.
        • Bergstrom J.O.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 501-506
        • Szymanowski P.
        • Szepieniec W.K.
        • Stuwczynski K.
        • et al.
        Cesarean section after laparoscopic hysterosacropexy with Richardson's lateral repair and Burch operation-Case report.
        Int J Surgery Case Reports. 2019; 59: 185-189
        • Price N.
        • Slack A.
        • Jackson S.R.
        Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
        BJOG. 2010; 117: 62-68
        • Maher C.F.
        • Carey M.P.
        • Murray C.J.
        Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97: 1010-1014
        • Tola E.N.
        • Erdemoglu E.
        • Erdemoglu E.
        Uterine sparing surgical methods in pelvic organ prolapse.
        Turkish J Obstetrics Gynecol. 2015; 12: 168-172
        • Chaudhuri S.K.
        The place of sling operations in treating genital prolapse in young women.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstetrics. 1978; 16: 314-320
        • Maher C.
        • Feiner B.
        • Baessler K.
        • et al.
        Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
        The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010; : CD004014
        • Dietz H.P.
        • Scoti F.
        • Subramaniam N.
        • et al.
        Impact of subsequent pregnancies on pelvic floor functional anatomy.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29: 1517-1522