Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 282, P83-88, March 2023

Quality of information regarding abnormal uterine bleeding available online

Published:January 20, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.01.020
Quality of information regarding abnormal uterine bleeding available online
Previous ArticleGynaecological pathologies leading to emergency department admissions: A cross-sectional study
Next ArticleIs dienogest a convenient treatment option for cesarean scar endometriosis or should it be treated surgically?

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The Internet and electronic devices with Internet access allow for a greater fluidity of information and speed of communication, especially in the field of health. Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) affects approximately 3–30% of women and can negatively impact their health and quality of life. Information regarding AUB that is available on the Internet may not be clear or accurate, rendering it difficult to understand and likely to result in delayed medical evaluation, which subsequently leads to worsening of the AUB.

      Objective

      To evaluate the quality of the information regarding AUB currently available on the Internet, including information regarding treatments.

      Methods

      The Google Trends website was searched for the most widely used English terms related to AUB. The identified descriptors were searched individually on the Google, Yahoo!, and Bing search engines. The first 10 results of each search were pre-selected and evaluated for inclusion in this study. Selected websites were categorically divided into two groups (news/magazine and academic) and individually analyzed by three experts using the DISCERN quality criteria (reliability, general quality, and quality of information) and the presence or absence of the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode®) seal.

      Results

      Of the 168 websites included in this study, 60.1% were allocated to the news/magazine group and 39.9% were allocated to the academic group. Over half of the websites (54.2%) did not have the HONcode® quality seal. Websites in the academic group were more likely to include accurate information regarding AUB with greater reliability than websites in the news/magazine group. There were no statistical differences regarding the general quality of the websites. Most websites were rated as either moderate quality (70.8%) or low quality (28.6%). The HONcode® criterion was found to be a confounding factor of the analyses, as the grouping and quality results of websites without this seal were significantly associated. In addition, websites in the news/magazines group were 6.7 times more likely to provide low quality information than websites in the academic group (odds ratio: 6.7; 95% confidence interval: 2.1–21.4).

      Conclusion

      The information regarding AUB that is available on the Internet is of low to moderate quality. Academic websites present more reliable information of greater quality. The presence of the HONcode® seal is considered important to determine the quality of the content of a website, especially for news/magazine websites, and may help Internet users identify websites that contain more reliable information. Algorithms and applications that categorize the quality of information and the reliability of health content may be useful tools that can help patients clarify their symptoms for several conditions including AUB.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. UNION., I. T. Measuring the Information Society Report 2018. UNION., I. T. Geneva Switzerland. 1: 204 p. 2018.

        View in Article

      2. CLINE, R. J.; HAYNES, K. M. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res, v. 16, n. 6, p. 671-92, Dec 2001. ISSN 0268-1153. Disponível em: < https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11780707 >.

        View in Article
        • Spencer C.P.
        • Whitehead M.I.
        Endometrial assessment re-visited.
        BJOG:An international journal of O&G. 1999; 106: 623-632
        View in Article
        • Côté I.
        • Jacobs P.
        • Cumming D.
        Work Loss Associated With Increased Menstrual Loss in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100: 683-687
        View in Article
        • Santer M.
        • Wyke S.
        • Warner P.
        What aspects of periods are most bothersome for women reporting heavy menstrual bleeding? Community survey and qualitative study.
        BMC Womens Health. 2007; 7
        View in Article
        • Jensen J.T.
        • Lefebvre P.
        • Laliberté F.
        • Sarda S.P.
        • Law A.
        • Pocoski J.
        • et al.
        Cost Burden and Treatment Patterns Associated with Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.
        J Womens Health. 2012; 21: 539-547
        View in Article
        • Fraser I.S.
        • Mansour D.
        • Breymann C.
        • Hoffman C.
        • Mezzacasa A.
        • Petraglia F.
        Prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding and experiences of affected women in a European patient survey.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 128: 196-200
        View in Article
        • Henry C.
        • Ekeroma A.
        • Filoche S.
        Barriers to seeking consultation for abnormal uterine bleeding: systematic review of qualitative research.
        BMC Womens Health. 2020; 20
        View in Article

      9. TREND, G. Google Trends Lessons. https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/training/lessons?tool=Google%20Trendsℑ=trends, 2019.

        View in Article

      10. M. Al-Jefri R. Evans G. Uchyigit P. Ghezzi What Is Health Information Quality? Ethical Dimension and Perception by Users Front. Med. 5.

        View in Article

      11. CHARNOCK, D. The DISCERN Handbook: Quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices. University of Oxford and The British Library: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1998. 55 ISBN 1 85775 310 0.

        View in Article
        • Boyer C.
        • Selby M.
        • Scherrer J.-R.
        • Appel R.D.
        The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites.
        Comput Biol Med. 1998; 28: 603-610
        View in Article
        • International; telecommunication; union
        Measuring digital development: Facts and figures.
        ITUPublications, Switzerland Geneva2019
        View in Article

      14. CETIC.BR. Centro Regional de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento da Sociedade da Informação, atuando sob os auspícios da UNESCO. 2020. Disponível em: < https://www.cgi.br/>.

        View in Article

      15. VALLE, C., XIMENES,; A. A., D. C., G. H. B., ROCHA, A. R., & RABELO JR, A. Patient education through public access systems. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação. 1: 81-94. p. 1997.

        View in Article
        • Som R.
        • Gunawardana N.P.
        Internet chemotherapy information is of good quality: assessment with the DISCERN tool.
        Br J Cancer. 2012; 107
        View in Article
        • Chang D.T.S.
        • Abouassaly R.
        • Lawrentschuk N.
        Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Prostate Cancer.
        Advances in Urology. 2018; 2018: 1-6
        View in Article
        • Daraz L.
        • Morrow A.S.
        • Ponce O.J.
        • Beuschel B.
        • Farah M.H.
        • Katabi A.
        • et al.
        Can Patients Trust Online Health Information? A Meta-narrative Systematic Review Addressing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet.
        J GEN INTERN MED. 2019; 34: 1884-1891
        View in Article
        • Lawrentschuk N.
        • Abouassaly R.
        • Hackett N.
        • Groll R.
        • Fleshner N.E.
        Health Information Quality on the Internet in Urological Oncology: A Multilingual Longitudinal Evaluation.
        Urology. 2009; 74: 1058-1063
        View in Article
        • Connelly T.M.
        • Khan M.S.
        • Victory L.
        • Mehmood A.
        • Cooke F.
        An assessment of the quality and content of information on diverticulitis on the internet.
        Surgeon. 2018; 16: 359-364
        View in Article
        • Rofaiel R.
        • Chande N.
        Biologic agents in inflammatory bowel disease – quality of internet website information.
        Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018; 24: 336
        View in Article

      22. SEGURADO, R.; LIMA, C. S.; AMENI, C. S. [Regulating the internet: a comparative analysis of Brazil, Chile, Spain, the US, and France]. Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos, v. Suppl, p. 1551-71, Dec 2015. ISSN 1678-4758. Disponível em: < https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25119248 >.

        View in Article
        • Silva L.V.E.R.
        • de Mello J.F.
        • Mion O.
        Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis.
        Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 71: 590-597
        View in Article

      24. BASTOS, B. G., &; FERRARI, D. V. Internet and education for the patient.: Arquivos internacionais de otorrinolaringologia. 15 (4). 515-522. p. 2011.

        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: January 20, 2023
      Accepted: January 18, 2023
      Received in revised form: January 10, 2023
      Received: October 5, 2022

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.01.020

      Copyright

      © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX